A component map tuning method for performance prediction and diagnostics of gas turbine compressors

Applied Energy

Volumn 135, Issue , 2014, Pages 572-585

  Tsoutsanis, Elias ^a   Meskin, Nader ^a   Benammar, Mohieddine ^a   Khorasani, Khashayar ^b  

^a Qatar University   (Qatar)

^b Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

Component map; Condition monitoring; Gas turbine; Model adaptation; Performance prediction

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT PROPULSION; COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES; CONDITION MONITORING; CURVE FITTING; ENGINES; FORECASTING; GAS COMPRESSORS; GAS PLANTS; GAS TURBINES; GASES; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; TURBINE COMPONENTS;

COMPONENT MAP; ENGINE PERFORMANCE MODELS; GAS TURBINE DIAGNOSTICS; MODEL ADAPTATION; MONITORING AND DIAGNOSTICS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION SCHEME; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; STEADY STATE AND TRANSIENTS;

GAS TURBINE POWER PLANTS;

MAP; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POWER PLANT; PREDICTION; SOFTWARE; TURBINE;

EID: 84907690680     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.115     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Templalexis I, Pilidis P, Pachidis V, Kotsiopoulos P. Development of a 2-D compressor streamline curvature code. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2006. p. 1005-14.
2. Yu Y., Chen L., Sun F., Wu C. Neural-network based analysis and prediction of a compressor's characteristic performance map. J Appl Energy 2007, 81(1):48-55.
3. Kong C., Kho S., Ki J. Component map generation of a gas turbine using genetic algorithms. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2004, 128(1):92-96.
4. Li Y.G., Ghafir M.F.A., Huang K., Feng X., Wang L., Singh R., et al. Improved multiple point nonlinear genetic algorithm based performance adaptation using least square method. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2012, 134(3):031701.
5. Kurzke J. How to get component maps for aircraft gas turbine performance calculations. In: Proc ASME Turbo Expo; 1996.
6. Jones G, Pilidis P, Curnock B. Extrapolation of compressor characteristics to the low-speed region for sub-idle performance modelling. In: Proc ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 2, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2002. p. 861-7.
7. Sethi V., Doulgeris G., Pilidis P., Nind A., Doussinault M., Cobas P. The map fitting tool methodology: gas turbine compressor off-design performance modeling. J Turbomach 2013, 135(6):061010.
8. Drummond C, Davison C. Capturing the shape variance in gas turbine compressor maps. In: Proc ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 1, Orlando, USA; 2009.
9. Ghorbanian K., Gholamrezaei M. An artificial neural network approach to compressor performance prediction. J Appl Energy 2009, 86(7):1210-1221.
10. Kong C., Ki J., Kang M. A new scaling method for component maps of gas turbine using system identification. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2003, 125(4):979-985.
11. Li Y.G., Pilidis P. GA-based design-point performance adaptation and its comparison with icm-based approach. J Appl Energy 2010, 87(1):340-348.
12. Ganguli R. Gas turbine diagnostics: signal processing and fault isolation 2012, CRC Press.
13. Tsoutsanis E, Li YG, Pilidis P, Newby M. Part-load performance of gas turbines: Part 1 A novel compressor map generation approach suitable for adaptive simulation. In: Proc ASME gas turbine India, vol. 1, Mumbai, India; 2012. p. 733-42.
14. PROOSIS, Propulsion Object-Oriented Simulation Software. <> 2014. http://www.proosis.com/.
15. Tsoutsanis E, Meskin N, Benammar M, Khorasani K. Dynamic performance simulation of an aeroderivative gas turbine using the Matlab Simulink environment. In: Proc ASME IMECE, vol. 4, San Diego, USA; 2013. p. V04AT04A050.
16. Tsoutsanis E, Li YG, Pilidis P, Newby M. Part-load performance of gas turbines: Part 2 multi-point adaptation with compressor map generation and GA optimization. In: Proc ASME gas turbine India, vol. 1, Mumbai, India; 2012. p. 743-51.
17. Aretakis N., Doumouras G., Roumeliotis I., Mathioudakis K. Compressor washing economic analysis and optimization for power generation. J Appl Energy 2012, 95:77-86.
18. Klapproth J, Miller M, Parker D. Aerodynamic development and performance of the CF6-6/LM2500 compressor. In: Proc 4th international symposium on air breathing engines, Orlando, USA; 1979. p. 243-9.
19. Zachos P.K., Aslanidou I., Pachidis V., Singh R. A sub-idle compressor characteristic generation method with enhanced physical background. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2011, 133(8):081702.
20. MATLAB, version 8.3 (R2014a). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.; 2014.
21. Fawke AJ, Saravanamuttoo HIH. Digital computer methods for prediction of gas turbine dynamic response. Tech rep, SAE Technical Paper; 1971.
22. Lagarias J., Reeds J., Wright M., Wright P. Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J Optim 1998, 9(1):112-147.
23. Li Y.G., Nilkitsaranont P. Gas turbine performance prognostic for condition-based maintenance. J Appl Energy 2009, 86(10):2152-2161.