A state of the art review on High Water Mark (HWM) determination

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 102, Issue PA, 2014, Pages 178-190

  Liu, Xin ^a   Xia, Jianhong ^a   Wright, Graeme ^a   Arnold, Lesley ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Coastal boundary; Coastal management; High Water Mark; Mean high water; Shoreline capture; Tide

Indexed keywords

MORPHOLOGY; SEA LEVEL; SPRINGS (WATER); TIDES;

COASTAL BOUNDARY; COASTAL MANAGEMENT; HIGH WATER; MEAN HIGH WATERS; SHORELINE CAPTURE;

REMOTE SENSING;

BEACH MORPHOLOGY; COASTAL PROTECTION; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; FIELD SURVEY; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; REMOTE SENSING; STORM SURGE;

EID: 84907681366     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.09.027     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Anders F.J., Byrnes M.R. Accuracy of shoreline change rates as determined from maps and aerial photographs. Shore Beach 1991, 59(1):17-26.
2. Anthony E.J., Orford J.D. Between wave-and tide-dominated coasts: the middle ground revisited. J.Coast. Res. 2002, 36(Special Issue):8-15.
3. Antunes A.F.B., Lingnau C., Da Silva J.C. Object oriented analysis and semantic network for high resolution image classification. Bol. Ciências Geodésicas 2003, 9(2):233-242.
4. Armaroli C., Ciavola P., Balouin Y., Gatti M. An integrated study of shoreline variability using GIS and ARGUS techniques. J.Coast. Res. 2004, 39(Special Issue):34-52.
5. Australian Hydrographic Service The Factors Contributing to the Level of Confidence in the Tidal Predictions Accuracy of Tidal Predictions 2010, Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping (ICSM), Wollongong.
6. Bater C.W., Coops N.C. Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation. Comput. Geosciences 2009, 35(2):289-300.
7. Bauer B.O., Allen J.R. Beach steps: an evolutionary perspective. Mar. Geol. 1995, 123(3):143-166.
8. Bellomo D., Pajak M.J., Sparks J. Coastal flood hazards and the national flood Insurance Program. J.Coast. Res. 1999, (28):21-26.
9. Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 2010, 65(1):2-16.
10. Blaschke T., Lang S., Hay G. Object-based Image Analysis: Spatial Concepts for Knowledge-driven Remote Sensing Applications 2008, Springer, Berlin.
11. Boak E.H., Turner I.L. Shoreline definition and detection: a review. J.Coast. Res. 2005, 21(4):688-703.
12. Briscoe J. The use of tidal datums in the law. Surv. Mapp. 1983, 43(2):115-121.
13. Burrough P.A., Frank A.U. Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries 1996, Taylor and Francis, London.
14. Cartwright D.E., Edden A.C. Corrected tables of tidal harmonics. Geophys. J. R. Astronom. Soc. 1973, 33(3):253-264.
15. Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services Computational Techniques for Tidal Datums Handbook 2003, NOAA Special Publication NOS CO-OPS 2, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring.
16. Clerke A. Determination of Mean High Water Mark within New South Wales 2004, 105. Bachelor's thesis Thesis, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba.
17. Cliff A.D., Ord K. Spatial autocorrelation: a review of existing and new measures with applications. Econ. Geogr. 1970, 46:269-292.
18. Cole G.M. Water Boundaries 1997, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York.
19. Cole G.M. Delineation of coastal boundaries using tidal data coastal areas and land administration. Building the Capacity 6th FIG Regional Conference 2007, International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), San José.
20. Collier P., Quadros N.D. Resolving spatial uncertainty in the tidal interface. Adm. Mar. Spaces 2006, 36(International Issues):36-50.
21. Coutts B.J. Mean high water as a cadastral boundary. Ocean Shorel. Manag. 1989, 12(4):309-330.
22. Crowell M., Leatherman S.P., Buckley M.K. Historical shoreline change: error analysis and mapping accuracy. J.Coast. Res. 1991, 7(3):839-852.
23. Darwin G.H. The Harmonic Analysis of Tidal Observations 1883, Scientific Papers, Cambridge University Press.
24. Department of Defence Australian National Tide Table 2008, Bureau of Meteorology, Kent Town.
25. Department of Oceanography Basic Concepts in Physical Oceanography: Tides 2007, University of Delaware, Newark.
26. Dietrich G., Kalle K. General Oceanography 1963, Inter Science, New York.
27. Dolan R., Hayden B.P., May P., May S. The reliability of shoreline change measurements from aerial photographs. Shore Beach 1980, 48(4):22-29.
28. Doodson A.T. The harmonic development of the tide-generating potential. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Cont. Papers Math. Phys. Char. 1921, 100(704):305-329.
29. Dragut L., Blaschke T. Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis. Geomorphology 2006, 81(3-4):330-344.
30. Dunphy B. Redefining Land/water Boundaries in Queensland: the New Rules from May 2010. (Natural Resources and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010) 2010, Monday Business Briefing. High Beam Research.
31. Fenner J. ATypical Coastline Profile with Normal Beach (Foreshore) Coastal Features where the Vertical and Horizontal Tidal Range Vary with Latitude, HWM Determination in WA 2010, Landgate, Perth.
32. Foreman M.G.G. Manual for Tidal Heights Analysis and Prediction 1977, (Pacific Marine Science Report, Sydney).
33. Fowler C., Treml E. Building a marine cadastral information system for the United States - a case study. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2001, 25(4-5):493-507.
34. Gay N. High water mark: boundary between public and private lands. Fla. Law Rev. 1965, 18:553.
35. Gill S.K., Schultz J.R. Tidal Datums and their Applications 2001, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington.
36. Greenfeld J. Analytical solution for the amplitude ratio method for determining mean high water in tidal regions. J.Surv. Eng. 2002, 128(2):61-75.
37. Guariglia A., Buonamassa A., Losurdo A., Saladino R., Trivigno M.L., Zaccagnino A., Colangelo A. Amultisource approach for coastline mapping and identification of shoreline changes. Ann. Geophys. 2006, 49(1):295-304.
38. Guy D.E. Erosion hazard area mapping, Lake County, Ohio. J.Coast. Res. 1999, 81(28):185-196.
39. Hamann R., Wade J. Ordinary high water line determination: legal issues. Fla. Law Rev. 1990, 42:323.
40. Hapke C., Richmond B. Monitoring beach morphology changes using small-format aerial photography and digital softcopy photogrammetry. Environ. Geosci. 2000, 7(1):32-37.
41. Hicks S.D. Tidal datums and their uses-a summary. Shore Beach 1985, 53(1):27-32.
42. Hicks S.D., Sillcox R.L., Nichols C.R., Via B., McCray E.C. Tide and Current Glossary 1989, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring.
43. Hirst B., Todd P. Defining boundaries within the tidal Interface. Coastal GIS Conference 2003, 7-8. University of Wollongong, Wollongong.
44. Hodgson M.E., Bresnahan P. Accuracy of airborne lidar-derived elevation: empirical assessment and error budget. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004, 70(3):331-340.
45. Hodgson M.E., Jensen J., Raber G., Tullis J., Davis B.A., Thompson G., Schuckman K. An evaluation of lidar-derived elevation and terrain slope in leaf-off conditions. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sens. 2005, 71(7):817.
46. Horlin E. Water Boundaries and Legal Definitions of High Water Mark 1994, 110. Bachelor's thesis Thesis, Curtin University, Perth.
47. Hsu J.R.C., Silvester R., Xia Y.M. Generalities on static equilibrium bays. Coast. Eng. 1989, 12(4):353-369.
48. Hubbert G.D., McLnnes K.L. Astorm surge inundation model for coastal planning and impact studies. J.Coast. Res. 1999, 15(1):168-185.
49. Humbach J.A., Gale J.A. Tidal title and the boundaries of the bay: the case of the submerged high water mark. Fordham Urban Law J. 1975, 4:91.
50. Jian X., Olea R.A., Yu Y. Semivariogram modeling by weighted least squares. Comput. Geosciences 1996, 22(4):387-397.
51. Kalra R., Deo M. Genetic programming for retrieving missing information in wave records along the west coast of India. Appl. Ocean Res. 2007, 29(3):99-111.
52. Kearns F.J. Water boundaries. New Zealand Surveyor 1980, XXXIX(5):470-476.
53. Kingston K.S., Ruessink B.G., Van Enckevort I.M.J., Davidson M.A. Artificial neural network correction of remotely sensed sandbar location. Mar. Geol. 2000, 169(1):137-160.
54. Korner T.W. Fourier Analysis 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
55. Land Services Nature Boundaries. Cadastral Survey Guidelines 2008, 18. Adelaide.
56. Landgate Survey & Plan Practice Manual 2009, Landgate, Perth.
57. Leon J., Correa C.T. Quantification of shoreline change in Salaverry, Peru. J.Coast. Res. 2006, (Special Issue 39):1013-1016.
58. List J.H., Farris A.S. Large-scale shoreline response to storms and fair weather. Fourth International Symposium on Coastal Engineering and Science of Coastal Sediment Processes 1999, 1324-1338. the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), New York.
59. Liu X., Xia J., Blenkinsopp C., Arnold L., Wright G. High water mark determination based on the principle of spatial continuity of the swash probability. J.Coast. Res. 2012, 30(3):13-16. 10.2112/jcoastres-d-12-00061.1.
60. Liu X., Xia J., Kuhn M., Wright G., Arnold L. Assessment of spatial and temporal variations of high water mark indicators. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 85(A):77-89.
61. Mahoney R. Permanent Committee on Tides & Mean Sea Level 2007, Department for Planning and Infrastructure, Perth.
62. Mahoney R. Coastal Demarcation Lines for Administrative and Engineering Purposes 2009, Department of Transport, Perth.
63. Mahoney R. Personal Communication 5th Dec 2009, Perth. X. Liu (Ed.).
64. Maiti S., Bhattacharya A.K. Shoreline change analysis and its application to prediction: a remote sensing and statistics based approach. Mar. Geol. 2009, 257(1):11-23.
65. Maloney F.E. The ordinary high water mark: attempts at settling an unsettled boundary line. Land Water Law Rev. 1977, 13:465.
66. Maloney F.E., Ausness R.C. The use and legal significance of the mean high water line in coastal boundary mapping. N.C. Law Rev. 1974, 53:185.
67. Maloney F.E., Ausness R.C. Use and legal significance of the mean high water line in coastal boundary mapping. N.C. Law Rev. 1974, 53:185.
68. Marpu P.R. Geographic Object-based Image Analysis 2009, Doctoral Dissertation Thesis, Technische Universitat Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg.
69. McBeth F.H. Amethod of shoreline delineation. Photogramm. Eng. 1956, 22(2):400-405.
70. Mitasova H., Drake T., Harmon R., Hofierka J., McNinch J. Spatio-temporal monitoring of evolving topography using LIDAR, real time kinematic GPS and sonar data. Open Source Free Software GIS-GRASS Users Conference 2002, University of Trento, Trento.
71. Moore L.J. Shoreline mapping techniques. J.Coast. Res. 2000, 16(1):111-124.
72. Moore L.J., Ruggiero P., List J.H. Comparing mean high water and high water line shorelines: should proxy-datum offsets be incorporated into shoreline change analysis?. J.Coast. Res. 2006, 22(4):894-905.
73. Morton R.A. Shoreline changes on Galveston Island (Bolivar Roads to San Luis Pass). Geol. Circ. 1974, 2:33.
74. Morton R.A. Accurate shoreline mapping: past, present, and future. Conference on Quantitative Approaches to Coastal Sediment Processes 1991, 997-1010. American Society of Civil Engineers, Seattle.
75. Morton R.A., Leach M.P., Paine J.G., Cardoza M.A. Monitoring beach changes using GPS surveying techniques. J.Coast. Res. 1993, 9(3):702-720.
76. Morton R.A., Miller T.L., Moore L.J. National Assessment of Shoreline Change: Part 1: Historical Shoreline Changes and Associated Coastal Land Loss along the US Gulf of Mexico 2004, 44. US Geological Survey Open File Report, 1043, DIANE Publishing, Collingdale.
77. Morton R.A., Speed F.M. Evaluation of shorelines and legal boundaries controlled by water levels on sandy beaches. J.Coast. Res. 1998, 14(4):1373-1384.
78. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Maritime Zones and Boundaries 2012, (Washington, DC).
79. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) History of Tidal Analysis and Prediction 2010, Silver Spring.
80. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Tidal Constituent, also Known as a Constituent Tide 2010, Silver Spring.
81. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Tide-predicting Machine 2010, Silver Spring.
82. Nunley J.C. Potential for Remote Sensing to Locate the Ordinary High Water Line in Florida: a Case Study of Lakes Hatchineha and Kissimmee 2002, (Master's Thesis), University of Florida, Gainesville.
83. Office of the State Engineer Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Guidelines 2007, North Dakota State Engineer.
84. Oliver M.A., Webster R. Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems. Int. J. Geogr. Information Syst. 1990, 4(3):313-332.
85. Overton M., Petrina C., Fisher J. Determining shoreline position using historical photography and digital softcopy photogrammetry. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing/American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ASPRS/ACSM) Annual Convention and Expo 1996, 512-513. ASPRS/ACSM, Bethesda.
86. Pajak M.J., Leatherman S. The high water line as shoreline indicator. J.Coast. Res. 2002, 18(2):329-337.
87. Papathoma M., Dominey-Howes D. Tsunami vulnerability assessment and its implications for coastal hazard analysis and disaster management planning, Gulf of Corinth, Greece. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2003, 3(6):733-747.
88. Parker B.B. The difficulties in measuring a consistently defined shoreline - the problem of vertical referencing. J.Coast. Res. 2003, (Special Issue 38):44-56.
89. Pattiaratchi C., Sarath Wijeratne E. Tide gauge observations of 2004-2007 indian ocean tsunamis from Sri Lanka and western Australia. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2009, 166(1):233-258.
90. Pawlowicz R., Beardsley B., Lentz S. Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using T_TIDE. Comput. Geosciences 2002, 28(8):929-937.
91. Phillips T. Harmonic Analysis and Prediction of Tides 1999, (New York).
92. Priest G.R. Coastal shoreline change study northern and central Lincoln County, Oregon. J.Coast. Res. 1999, 81(28):140-157.
93. Pugh D.T. Tides, Surges and Mean Sea-level (Reprinted with Corrections) 1996, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester.
94. Quadros N.D., Collier P.A. Anew approach to delineating the Littoral zone for an australian Marine cadastre. J.Coast. Res. 2008, 24(3):780-789.
95. Rooney J.J.B., Fletcher C.H. Ahigh resolution, digital, aerial photogrammetric analysis of historical shoreline change and net sediment transport along the Kihei coast of Maui, Hawaii. Thirteenth Annual National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology 2000, Florida Shore & Beach Preservation Association, Melbourne, Florida.
96. Ruggiero P., Kaminsky G.M., Gelfenbaum G. Linking proxy-based and Datum-based shorelines on a high-energy coastline: implications for shoreline change analyses. J.Coast. Res. 2003, 81(38):57-82.
97. Ruggiero P., List J.H. Improving accuracy and statistical reliability of shoreline position and change rate estimates. J.Coast. Res. 2009, 25(5):1069-1081.
98. Shalowitz A.L. Shore and Sea Boundaries: with Special Reference to the Interpretation and Use of Coast and Geodetic Survey Data 1964, Coast and Geodetic Survey, Washington.
99. Short A.D., Hogan C.L. Rip Currents and Beach hazards: their impact on public Safety and implications for coastal management. J.Coast. Res. 1994, (Special Issue12):197-209.
100. Shoshany M., Degani A. Shoreline detection by digital image processing of aerial photography. J.Coast. Res. 1992, 8(1):29-34.
101. Simon D. Ordinary High-water Mark(OHWM). Waterway and Wetland Handbook 1993, (Wisconsin).
102. Songberg G. Accurate mean high water mark determination fact or Fiction. New South Wales Staff Surveyors Association Incorporated Annual Conference 2004, 49-65. Association of Public Authority Surveyors NSW, Sydney.
103. Stockdon H.F., Sallenger A.H., List J.H., Holman R.A. Estimation of shoreline position and change using airborne topographic lidar data. J.Coast. Res. 2002, 18(3):502-513.
104. The Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping (ICSM) Australian Tides Manual, Special Publications 9 Handbook, Wollongong 2009, 43.
105. The Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping (ICSM) Tides, Sea Level and Water Currents 2010, (Canberra).
106. The Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping (ICSM) Tidal Interface Compendium of Terms 2012, (Canberra).
107. The Virginia Institute of Marine Science TIDE ANALYSIS 2010.
108. Thieler E., Himmelstoss E.A., Zichichi J.L., Ergul A. The Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) Version 4. 0 - An ArcGIS Extension for Calculating Shoreline Change 2009, U.S. Geological Survey.
109. URS Group Inc High Water Mark Collection for Hurricane Katrina in Alabama 2006, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Gaithersburg.
110. Uunk L., Wijnberg K.M., Morelissen R. Automated mapping of the intertidal beach bathymetry from video images. Coast. Eng. 2010, 57(4):461-469.
111. Walter V. Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. J.Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 2004, 58(3):225-238.
112. Whittal J. The Integrated Coastal Management Act No 24 of 2008 (ICMA) - a professional land surveyor's interpretation. The Jubilee Congress of the Commission on Legal Pluralism 2011, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.
113. Whittal J., Fisher F. Implications of the Integrated Coastal Management Act No 24 of 2008 on the South African coastal cadastre and its survey and management. AfricaGEO Conference 2011, AfricaGEO, Cape Town.
114. Williams-Wynn C. Practical examples of the legal position of the High Water Mark at a specific point in time. AfricaGEO Conference 2011, AfricaGEO, Cape Town.
115. Wood S. Determination of High Water Mark: the Don Wallace Method 2005, 318. Bachelor (Hons)'s Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth.