Impact of tamsulosin on urinary retention following early catheter removal after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 164-168

  Jeong, In Gab ^a   You, Dalsan ^a   Yoon, Jong Hyun ^a   Hong, Sungwoo ^a   Lim, Ju Hyun ^a   Hong, Jun Hyuk ^a   Choo, Myung Soo ^a   Ahn, Hanjong ^a   Kim, Choung Soo ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Tamsulosin; Urinary retention

Indexed keywords

TAMSULOSIN; SULFONAMIDE; URINARY TRACT AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CANCER SURGERY; CATHETER REMOVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY INTERVENTION; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CONTINENCE SOCIETY MALE QUESTIONNAIRE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETHRAL CATHETER; URINE RETENTION; UROFLOWMETRY; UROGENITAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ACUTE DISEASE; AGED; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICE REMOVAL; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE TUMOR; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TAMSULOSIN; URINARY RETENTION;

ACUTE DISEASE; AGED; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROBOTICS; SULFONAMIDES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY CATHETERIZATION; URINARY RETENTION; UROLOGICAL AGENTS;

EID: 84907678061     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/iju.12225     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Moore KN, Estey A. The early post-operative concerns of men after radical prostatectomy. J. Adv. Nurs. 1999; 29: 1121-1129.
2. Koch MO, Nayee AH, Sloan J etal. Early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy: long-term followup. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 2170-2172.
3. Patel R, Lepor H. Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61: 156-160.
4. Harpster LE, Brien J. Initial results using a running vesicourethral anastomosis following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2007; 177: 118-122; discussion 122.
5. Nadu A, Salomon L, Hoznek A etal. Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2001; 166: 1662-1664.
6. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W etal. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. 2009; 55: 1037-1063.
7. Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur. Urol. 2009; 55: 1358-1366.
8. Tewari A, Rao S, Mandhani A. Catheter-less robotic radical prostatectomy using a custom-made synchronous anastomotic splint and vesical urinary diversion device: report of the initial series and perioperative outcomes. BJU Int. 2008; 102: 1000-1004.
9. Sammon JD, Trinh QD, Sukumar S etal. Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int. 2012; 110: 580-585.
10. Krane LS, Bhandari M, Peabody JO, Menon M. Impact of percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage on patient discomfort after radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2009; 56: 325-330.
11. Patel R, Fiske J, Lepor H. Tamsulosin reduces the incidence of acute urinary retention following early removal of the urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 62: 287-291.
12. Ishizaka K, Machida T, Tanaka M, Kawamura N, Nakamura K, Kihara K. Clinical efficacy of naftopidil on lower urinary tract symptoms after radical prostatectomy. Int. J. Urol. 2009; 16: 299-302.
13. Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Novara G, Ficarra V. Robotic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of the impact on cancer control. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2011; 21: 179-184.
14. Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P etal. Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur. Urol. 2007; 52: 376-383.
15. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M etal. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2002; 21: 167-178.
16. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA etal. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2011; 59: 72-80.
17. Agarwal PK, Sammon J, Bhandari A etal. Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur. Urol. 2011; 59: 684-698.
18. Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X etal. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve. Urology 2009; 73: 127-133.
19. Joshi N, de Blok W, van Muilekom E, van der Poel H. Impact of posterior musculofascial reconstruction on early continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective parallel group trial. Eur. Urol. 2010; 58: 84-89.
20. Nasu K, Moriyama N, Fukasawa R etal. Quantification and distribution of alpha1-adrenoceptor subtype mRNAs in human proximal urethra. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1998; 123: 1289-1293.
21. Levin RM, Ruggieri MR, Wein AJ. Identification of receptor subtypes in the rabbit and human urinary bladder by selective radio-ligand binding. J. Urol. 1988; 139: 844-848.
22. Walden PD, Durkin MM, Lepor H, Wetzel JM, Gluchowski C, Gustafson EL. Localization of mRNA and receptor binding sites for the alpha 1a-adrenoceptor subtype in the rat, monkey and human urinary bladder and prostate. J. Urol. 1997; 157: 1032-1038.
23. Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2010; 57: 363-370.
24. Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B etal. Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur. Urol. 2010; 57: 945-952.
25. Freire MP, Weinberg AC, Lei Y etal. Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur. Urol. 2009; 56: 972-980.
26. Budaus L, Abdollah F, Sun M etal. Annual surgical caseload and open radical prostatectomy outcomes: improving temporal trends. J. Urol. 2010; 184: 2285-2290.
27. Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM etal. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J. Urol. 2010; 183: 1366-1372.
28. Cooperberg MR, Odisho AY, Carroll PR. Outcomes for radical prostatectomy: is it the singer, the song, or both? J. Clin. Oncol. 2012; 30: 476-478.