The relation between maternal phenotype and offspring size, explained by overhead material costs of reproduction

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 364, Issue , 2015, Pages 168-178

  Filin, Ido ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Allometry; Energy budget; Foraging; Starvation risk; Stochastic

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; ENERGY BUDGET; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; LIFE HISTORY THEORY; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; STARVATION; STOCHASTICITY;

ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; LIFE CYCLE; LIFE HISTORY; LITTER SIZE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MORTALITY; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PROGENY; REPRODUCTION; STARVATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY SIZE; FEMALE; LIFE CYCLE STAGE; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SURVIVAL;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; LIFE CYCLE STAGES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84907652268     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Beck C.W., Beck R.E. The effect of packing constraints on optimal investment in offspring. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2005, 7:1077-1088.
2. Begon M., Parker G.A. Should egg size and clutch size decrease with age?. Oikos 1986, 47:293-302.
3. Bernardo J. The particular maternal effect of propagule size, especially egg size. patterns, models, quality of evidence and interpretations. Am. Zool. 1996, 36:216-236.
4. Bonner J.T. On Development 1974, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Bonsall M.B., Klug H. The evolution of parental care in stochastic environments. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:645-655.
6. Brose U. Body-mass constraints on foraging behaviour determine population and food-web dynamics. Funct. Ecol. 2010, 24:28-34.
7. Calder W.A. Size, Function and Life History 1996, Dover Publications Inc., Mineola, NY.
8. Caley M.J., Schwarzkopf L., Shine R. Does total reproductive effort evolve independently of offspring size?. Evolution 2001, 55:1245-1248.
9. Caraco T., Uetz G., Gillespie R.G., Giraldeau L.A. Resource consumption variance within and among individuals. on coloniality in spiders. Ecology 1995, 76:196-205.
10. Carlquist S. Island Biology 1974, Columbia University Press, New York.
11. Charnov E.L. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1976, 9:129-136.
12. Filin I. A diffusion-based approach to stochastic individual growth and energy budget, with consequences to life-history optimization and population dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:1252-1267.
13. Filin I. Target size and optimal life history when individual growth and energy budget are stochastic. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 264:510-516.
14. Filin I., Ovadia O. Individual size variation and population stability. a discrete time model and its calibration using grasshoppers. Am. Nat. 2007, 170:719-733.
15. Ford N.B., Seigel R.A. An experimental test of the fractional egg size hypothesis. Herpetologica 2010, 66:451-455.
16. Fox C.W., Czesak M.E. Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2000, 45:341-369.
17. Goulden C.E., Henry L., Berrigan D. Egg size, postembryonic yolk, and survival ability. Oecologia 1987, 72:28-31.
18. Grimm V., Uchmanski J. Individual variability and population regulation. a model of the significance of within-generation density dependence. Oecologia 2002, 131:196-202.
19. Gross M.R. Salmon breeding behavior and life history evolution in changing environments. Ecology 1991, 72:1180-1186.
20. Guinnee M.A., West S.A., Little T.J. Testing small clutch size models with Daphnia. Am. Nat. 2004, 163:880-887.
21. Haig D. Brood reduction and optimal parental investment when offspring differ in quality. Am. Nat. 1990, 136:550-556.
22. Harshman L.G., Zera A.J. The cost of reproduction. the devil in the details. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:80-86.
23. Hendry A.P., Day T. Revisiting the positive correlation between female size and egg size. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2003, 5:421-429.
24. Hendry A.P., Day T., Cooper A.B. Optimal size and number of propagules. allowance for discrete stages and effects of maternal size on reproductive output and offspring fitness. Am. Nat. 2001, 157:387-407.
25. Huss M., Persson L., Bystrom P. The origin and development of individual size variation in early pelagic stages of fish. Oecologia 2007, 153:57-67.
26. ItÔ Y., Iwasa Y. Evolution of litter size. I. Conceptual reexamination. Res. Popul. Ecol. 1981, 23:344-359.
27. Jann P., Ward P.I. Maternal effects and their consequences for offspring fitness in the yellow dung fly. Funct. Ecol. 1999, 13:51-58.
28. Jørgensen C., Auer S.K., Reznick D.N. A model for optimal offspring size in fish, including live-bearing and parental effects. Am. Nat. 2011, 177:E119-E135.
29. Kalbfleisch J.D., Prentice R.L. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data 2002, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
30. Kamler E. Parent-egg-progeny relationships in teleost fishes. an energetics perspective. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2005, 15:399-421.
31. Kaplan R.H., Cooper W.S. The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics. an application of the "adaptive coin-flipping" principle. Am. Nat. 1984, 123:393-410.
32. Kaplan R.H., Cooper W.S. On the evolution of coin-flipping plasticity. a response to mcginley, temme, and geber. Am. Nat. 1988, 132:735-755.
33. Kawano S., Hara T. Optimal balance between propagule output, propagule size, and cost of propagule production in plants with special reference to its evolutionary-ecological implications. Plant Species Biol. 1995, 10:119-125.
34. Kiflawi M. On optimal propagule size and developmental time. Oikos 2006, 113:168-173.
35. Kindsvater H.K., Bonsall M.B., Alonzo S.H. Survival costs of reproduction predict age-dependent variation in maternal investment. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:2230-2240.
36. Kindsvater H.K., Alonzo S.H., Mangel M., Bonsall M.B. Effects of age- and state-dependent allocation on offspring size and number. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2010, 12:327-346.
37. Kindsvater H.K., Rosenthal G.G., Alonzo S.H. Maternal size and age shape offspring size in a live-bearing fish. Xiphophorus birchmanni. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(11):e48473.
38. Kindsvater H.K., Simpson S.E., Rosenthal G.G., Alonzo S.H. Male diet, female experience, and female size influence maternal investment in swordtails. Behav. Ecol. 2013, 24:691-697.
39. Kooijman S.A.L.M. Dynamic Energy Budget Theory for Metabolic Organisation 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
40. Kooijman S., Kooi B., Hallam T. The application of mass and energy conservation laws in physiologically structured population models of heterotrophic organisms. J. Theor. Biol. 1999, 197:371-392.
41. Kozlowski J. Optimal initial size and adult size of animals. consequences for macroevolution and community structure. Am. Nat. 1996, 147:101-114.
42. Lack D. The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers 1954, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
43. Landa K. Adaptive seasonal variation in grasshopper offspring size. Evolution 1992, 46:1992.
44. Lloyd D.G. Selection of offspring size at independence and other size-versus-number strategies. Am. Nat. 1987, 129:800-817.
45. Ludwig D., Rowe L. Life-history strategies for energy gain and predator avoidance under time constraints. Am. Nat. 1990, 135:686-707.
46. Marshall D.J., Keough M.J. The evolutionary ecology of offspring size in marine invertebrates. Adv. Mar. Biol. 2008, 53:1-60.
47. Marshall D.J., Heppell S.S., Munch S.B., Warner R.R. The relationship between maternal phenotype and offspring quality. do older mothers really produce the best offspring?. Ecology 2010, 91:2862-2873.
48. McGinley M.A., Temme D.H., Geber M.A. Parental investment in offspring in variable environments. theoretical and empirical considerations. Am. Nat. 1987, 130:370-398.
49. McGinley M.A., Charnov E.L. Multiple resources and the optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Evol. Ecol. 1988, 2:77-84.
50. Messina F.J., Fox C.W. Offspring size and number. Evolutionary Ecology: Concepts and Case Studies 2001, 113-127. Oxford University Press, New York. C.W. Fox, D.A. Roff, D.J. Fairbairn (Eds.).
51. Moczek A.P. Horn polyphenism in the beetle Onthophagus taurus. larval diet quality and plasticity in parental investment determine adult body size and male horn morphology. Behav. Ecol. 1998, 9:636-641.
52. Morris D.W. Optimal allocation of parental investment. Oikos 1987, 49:332-339.
53. Morris D.W. State-dependent optimization of litter size. Oikos 1998, 83:518-528.
54. Müller E.B., Nisbet R.M. Survival and production in variable resource environments. Bull. Math. Biol. 2000, 62:1163-1189.
55. Nasution S., Roberts D., Farnsworth K., Parker G.A., Elwood R.W. Maternal effects on offspring size and packaging constraints in the whelk. J. Zool. 2010, 281:112-117.
56. Parker G.A., Begon M. Optimal egg size and clutch size. effects of environment and maternal phenotype. Am. Nat. 1986, 128:573-592.
57. Petchey O.L., Beckerman A.P., Riede J.O., Warren P.H. Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:4191-4196.
58. R Core Team, 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. http://www. R-project.org/.
59. Reiss M.J. The Allometry of Growth and Reproduction 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
60. Reznick D., Yang A.P. The influence of fluctuating resources on life history. patterns of allocation and plasticity in female guppies. Ecology 1993, 74:2011-2019.
61. RoffD.A. Life History Evolution 2002, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
62. Rollinson N., Hutchings J.A. Why does egg size increase with maternal size? effects of egg size and egg density on offspring phenotypes in atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Evol. Ecol. Res. 2010, 12:949-960.
63. Rotkopf R., Ovadia O. Examining growth rate and starvation endurance in pit-building antlions from mediterranean and desert regions. Ecol. Entomol. 2014, 39:94-100.
64. Rowe L., Ludwig D. Size and timing of metamorphosis in complex life cycles. time constraints and variation. Ecology 1991, 72:413-427.
65. Sakai S., Kikuzawa K., Umeki K. Evolutionary stable resource allocation for production of wind-dispersed seeds. Evol. Ecol. 1998, 12:447-485.
66. Sakai S., Harada Y. Why do large mothers produce large offspring? Theory and a test. Am. Nat. 2001, 157:348-359.
67. Sakai S., Harada Y. Size-number trade-offand optimal offspring size for offspring produced sequentially using a fixed amount of reserves. J. Theor. Biol. 2004, 226:253-264.
68. Sakai S., Harada Y. Production of offspring using current income and reserves. size-number trade-offand optimal offspring size. J. Theor. Biol. 2005, 233:65-73.
69. Sakai S., Sakai A. Nature of size number trade off. test of the terminal-stream-limitation model for seed production of Cardiocrium cordatum. Oikos 2005, 108:105-114.
70. Sargent R.C., Taylor P., Gross M. Parental care and the evolution of egg size in fishes. Am. Nat. 1987, 129:32-46.
71. Scharf I., Filin I., Golan M., Buchshtav M., Subach A., Ovadia O. A comparison between desert and mediterranean antlion populations. differences in life history and morphology. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:162-172.
72. Schultz D.L. Parental investment in temporally varying environments. Evol. Ecol. 1991, 5:415-427.
73. Segers F.H.I.D., Taborsky B. Egg size and food abundance interactively affect juvenile growth and behaviour. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 35:166-176.
74. Shine R. Alternative models for the evolution of offspring size. Am. Nat. 1989, 134:311-317.
75. Sinervo B. Mechanistic analysis of natural selection and a refinement of Lack[U+05F3]s and Williams[U+05F3]s principles. Am. Nat. 1999, 154:S26-S42.
76. Smith C.C., Fretwell S.D. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 1974, 108:499-506.
77. Stephens D.W., Charnov E.L. Optimal foraging. some simple stochastic models. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1982, 10:251-263.
78. Temme D.H. Seed size variability. a consequence of variable genetic quality among offspring. Evolution 1986, 40:414-417.
79. Thierry A., Petchey O.L., Beckerman A.P., Warren P.H., Williams R.J. The consequences of size dependent foraging for food web topology. Oikos 2011, 120:493-502.
80. Uller T., While G.M., Wapstra E., Warner D.A., Goodman B.A., Schwarzkopf L., Langkilde T., Doughty P., Radder R.S., Rohr D.H., Bull C.M., Shine R., Olsson M. Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:143-151.
81. van der Sman J., Phillips N.E., Pfister C.A. Relative effects of maternal and juvenile food availability for a marine snail. Ecology 2009, 90:3119-3125.
82. Wall R., Begon M. Population density, phenotype and reproductive output in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus. Ecol. Entomol. 1987, 12:331-339.
83. Werner E.E., Gilliam J.F. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1984, 15:393-425.
84. West-Eberhard M.J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
85. Winkler D.W., Wallin K. Size and number. a life history model linking effort per offspring and total effort. Am. Nat. 1987, 129:708-720.