|
Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 559-561
|
Inappropriate use of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) as a guide for reimbursement
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
APPROPRIATE USE CRITERIA;
ARTICLE;
CARDIOLOGIST;
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE;
CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY;
CLINICAL DECISION MAKING;
COMORBIDITY;
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE;
CORONARY STENT;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DEVELOPED COUNTRY;
FRUSTRATION;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION;
HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION;
HIP ARTHROPLASTY;
HUMAN;
MEDICAID;
MEDICAL SOCIETY;
MEDICARE;
ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY;
PATIENT EDUCATION;
PATIENT PREFERENCE;
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
REIMBURSEMENT;
ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION;
STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;
CORONARY DISEASE;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM;
ECONOMICS;
HEALTH SERVICE;
PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE;
REGISTER;
UNITED STATES;
CORONARY DISEASE;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES;
GUIDELINE ADHERENCE;
HEALTH SERVICES MISUSE;
HUMANS;
MEDICAID;
MEDICARE;
MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION;
REGISTRIES;
REIMBURSEMENT MECHANISMS;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 84907630472
PISSN: 10423931
EISSN: 15572501
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (5)
|