'The Hare and the Tortoise': Lessons from Baltic Sea and Mediterranean Sea governance

Marine Policy

Volumn 50, Issue , 2014, Pages 331-338

  Jouanneau, Charlène ^a   Raakjær, Jesper ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Baltic; Governance; Mediterranean; Participation; Regionalisation; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; REGIONALIZATION; STAKEHOLDER;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA; FRANCE; MEDITERRANEAN SEA;

EID: 84907595883     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Van Deveer S. Protecting Europe's seas: lessons from the last 25 years. Environment 2000, 42(6):10-26.
2. Long R. Legal aspects of ecosystem-based marine management in Europe. Ocean yearbook 2012, vol. 26:417-484. University of Chicago Press, Boston, Leiden.
3. Van Leeuwen J., Van Hoof L., Van Tatenhove J. Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar Policy 2012, 36(3):636-643.
4. Liefferink D., Andersen M.S. Strategies of the 'Green' member states in EU environmental policy-making. J Eur Public Policy 1998, 5(2):254-270.
5. Börzel T. Pace-setting, foot-dragging, and fence-sitting: member state responses to Europeanisation. J Common Mark Stud 2002, 40(2):193-214.
6. Kern K, Löffelsend T. Governance beyond the nation-state: transnationalization and europeanisation of the Baltic Sea Region. In: Joas M, Jahn D, Kern K, editors. Governing a Common Sea: Environmental Policies in the Baltic Sea Region, London: Earthscan; 2004 .
7. Bengtsson R. An EU. Strategy for the Baltic sea region: good intentions meet complex challenges. European policy analysis, vol. 9, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (SIEPS); 2009.
8. Tourret JC,Wallaert V. Three scenarios for a Mediterranean macro-regional approach. Medgovernance Project. Institut de la Méditerranée; 2010.
9. Joas M., Kern K., Sandberg S. Actors and arenas in hybrid networks: implication for environmental policy-making in the Baltic Sea Region. Ambio 2007, 36(2-3):237-242.
10. Pridham G. Environmental policies and problems of legislation in Southern Europe. South Eur Soc Polit 1996, 1(1):47-73.
11. Chevalier C. Governance of the Mediterranean Sea, Outlook for the legal regime. IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation; 2005.
12. La Spina A, Sciortino G. Common agenda, southern rules: European integration and environmental change in the Mediterranean states. In: Liefferink JD, Lowe PD, Mol APJ, editors. European Integration and Environmental Policy; 1993.
13. Izci R. EU integration and the environment in the Mediterranean: a learning process for opportunities and for co-operation. In: Euro-Mediterranean integration, The Mediterranean's Europe challenge, European documentation and research centre 2005; vol. 3: p. 128-41.
14. Börzel T. Why there is no southern problem. On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union. J Eur Public Policy 2000, 7(1):141-162.
15. Van Hoof L., Van Leeuwen J., Van Tatenhove J. All at sea, regionalisation and integration of marine policy in Europe. Marite Stud 2012, 11(9):1-14.
16. Van Tatenhove J. How to turn the tide: developing legitimate marine governance arrangements at the level of regional seas. Ocean Coast Manag 2013, 71:296-304.
17. Raakjær J, Van Leeuwen J, Van Tatenhove J, Hadjimichael M Ecosystem-based marine management in European regional seas calls for nested governance structures and coordination - a policy brief. Mar policy 2014, 50:373-381.
18. Chhotray V., Stoker G. Governance theory and practice. A cross-disciplinary approach. Public Adm 2009, 87(4):982-983.
19. Van Tatenhove J., Mak J., Liefferink D. The inter-play between formal and informal practices. Perspect Eur Politics Soc 2006, 7:8-24.
20. Symes D. Regionalising the Common Fisheries Policy: context, content and controversy. Marit Stud 2012, 11(6):1-21.
21. Hegland T.J., Ounanian K., Raakjaer J. Why and how to regionalise the Common Fisheries Policy. Marit Stud 2012, 11:7.
22. Ounanian K., Delaney A., Raakjaer J., Ramirez-Monsalve P. On unequal footing: Stakeholders' perspectives on the Marine Strategy Framework Directive as a mechanism of the ecosystem-based approach to marine management. Mar Policy 2012, 36(3):658-666.
23. Babbie E. The practice of social research 2001, Wadsworth Thomson, Belmont, CA. 9th ed.
24. Kasekamp A. Baltic states and the EU: a rocky road from «outside» towards «the core». The Baltic states in the EU: yesterday, today and tomorrow, studies and reports N98 2013, Jacques Delors Institute, Notre Europe. A. Grigas, A. Kasekamp, L. Zorgenfreija (Eds.).
25. Balcytiene A. Culture as a guide in theoretical exploration of Baltic Media. Comparing media systems beyond the western world 2011, 51. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. D.C. Hallin, P. Mancini (Eds.).
26. Schmid D. Du processus de Barcelone à l'Union pour la Méditerranée: changement de nom ou de fond?. Quest Int 2009, 36:46-53.
27. Leveau R. La Méditerranée dans la politique française. Etudes du CERI. Paris; 1987.
28. Ministère de l'écologie, du développement durable et de l'énergie. Compte rendu de la réunion du groupe miroir de concertation sur la mise en œuvre de la «directive-cadre stratégie pour le milieu marin» (DCSMM) du 27 juin 2012. http://wwz.ifremer.fr/dcsmm/content/download/66899/891582/file/CR_GROMICO_27.06.12.pdf.
29. Salomon M. The European commission proposal for a marine strategy: lacking substance. Mar Pollut Bull 2006, 52:1328-1329.
30. Scott J. Cross-border governance in the Baltic Sea region. Reg Fed Stud 2002, 12(4):135-153.
31. Pierson P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 2000, 94(2):251-267.
32. Mahoney J. Path dependance in historical sociology. Theory Soc 2000, 29(4):507-548.