Sub-organizations of institutions in computer science journals at the turn of the century

Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 53-68

  Fiala, Dalibor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Citations; Collaboration; Computer science; Institutions; Research productivity; Sub organizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907571042     PISSN: 13946234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arakaki, M. and Willett, P. 2009. Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science: A follow-up study. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 35, no. 2: 143-152.
2. Arencibia-Jorge, R., Barrios-Almaguer, I., Fernández-Hernández, S. and Carvajal-Espino, R. 2008. Applying successive H indices in the institutional evaluation: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59, no. 1: 155-157.
3. Ben-David, D. 2010. Ranking Israel's economists. Scientometrics, Vol. 82, no. 2: 351-364.
4. Colliander, C. and Ahlgren, P. 2011. The effects and their stability of field normalization baseline on relative performance with respect to citation impact: A case study of 20 natural science departments. Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 5, no. 1: 101-113.
5. Colman, A.M., Debra, D. and Coulthard, B. 1995. A bibliometric evaluation of the research performance of British university politics departments: Publications in leading journals. Scientometrics, Vol. 32, no. 1: 49-66.
6. Fiala, D. 2012. Time-aware PageRank for bibliographic networks. Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 6, no. 3, 370-388.
7. Fiala, D., Ježek, K. and Rousselot, F. 2006. Finding Authoritative Researchers on Academic Web Sites. Proceedings of World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology, Vol. 17: 74-79.
8. Fiala, D., Rousselot, F. and Ježek, K. 2007. Ranking algorithms for Web sites: Finding Authoritative Academic Web Sites and Researchers. In J. Filipe, J. Cordeiro, B. Encarnaçao and V. Pedrosa (eds.). Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies. Barcelona: INSTICC: 372-375.
9. García, J.A., Rodriguez-Sánchez, R. and Fdez-Valdivia, J. 2012. A comparison of top economics departments in the US and EU on the basis of the multidimensional prestige of influential articles in 2010. Scientometrics, Vol. 93, no. 3: 681-698.
10. Hirsch, J.E. 2005. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 102, no. 46: 16569-16572.
11. Lazaridis, T. 2010. Ranking university departments using the mean h-index. Scientometrics, Vol. 82, no. 2: 211-216.
12. Lee, G.J. 2010. Assessing publication performance of research units: Extensions through operational research and economic techniques. Scientometrics, Vol. 84, no. 3: 717- 734.
13. Li, X., Thelwall, M., Musgrove, P. and Wilkinson, D. 2003. The relationship between the WIFs or inlinks of computer science departments in UK and their RAE ratings or research productivities in 2001. Scientometrics, Vol. 57, no. 2: 239-255.
14. Li, X., Thelwall, M., Wilkinson, D. and Musgrove, P. 2005. National and international university departmental web site interlinking. Part 1: Validation of departmental link analysis. Scientometrics, Vol. 64, no. 2: 151-185.
15. Nederhof, A.J., Meijer, R.F., Moed, H.F. and Van Raan, A.F.J. 1993. Research performance indicators for university departments: A study of an agricultural university. Scientometrics, Vol. 27, no. 2: 157-178.
16. Nederhof, A.J. and Noyons, E.C.M. 1992. Assessment of the international standing of university departments' research: A comparison of bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, Vol. 24, no. 3: 393-404.
17. Oppenheim, C. 1995. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 51, no. 1: 18-27.
18. Oppenheim, C. 1997. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 53, no. 5: 477-487.
19. Seng, L.B. and Willett, P. 1995. The citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 21, no. 1: 68-71.
20. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga N.S., Wang, J.T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B. and Ideker, T. 2003. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research, Vol. 13, no. 11: 2498-2504.
21. Tang, R. and Thelwall, M. 2004. Patterns of national and international Web inlinks to US academic departments: An analysis of disciplinary variations. Scientometrics, Vol. 60, no. 3: 475-485.
22. Thomas, O. and Willett, P. 2000. Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 26, no. 6: 421-428.
23. Torres-Salinas, D., Lopez-Cózar, E.D. and Jiménez-Contreras, E. 2009. Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus. Scientometrics, Vol. 80, no. 3: 761-774.
24. Zhou, P. and Leydesdorff, L. 2011. Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing. Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 5, no. 3, 360-368.