The impact of hazardous industrial facilities on housing prices: A comparison of parametric and semiparametric hedonic price models

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 49, Issue , 2014, Pages 93-107

  Grislain Letrémy, Céline ^a,b,c   Katossky, Arthur ^d,e  

^a INSEE   (France)

^b CREST   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^e Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Conditionally parametric regression; Hedonic analysis; Industrial risk; Urban housing markets

Indexed keywords

HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HAZARDOUS WASTE; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; HOUSING MARKET; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MODEL TEST; URBAN HOUSING; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

FRANCE;

EID: 84907527425     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anglin P.M., Gencay R. Semiparametric estimation of a hedonic price function. J. Appl. Econ. 1996, 11(6):633-648.
2. Bartik T.J. The estimation of demand parameters in hedonic price models. J. Polit. Econ. 1987, 95(1):81-88.
3. Bin O., Kruse J.B., Landry C.E. Flood hazards, insurance rates, and amenities: evidence from the coastal housing market. J. Risk Insur. 2008, 75(1):63-82.
4. Bontemps C., Simioni M., Surry Y. Semiparametric hedonic price models: assessing the effects of agricultural nonpoint source pollution. J. Appl. Econ. 2008, 23(6):825-842.
5. Boxall P.C., Chan W.H., McMillan M.L. The impact of oil and natural gas facilities on rural residential property values: a spatial hedonic analysis. Resour. Energy Econ. 2005, 27:248-269.
6. Carroll T.M., Clauretie T.M., Jensen J., Waddoups M. The economic impact of a transient hazard on property values: the 1988 PEPCON explosion in Henderson, Nevada. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 1996, 13(2):143-167.
7. Chay K.Y., Greenstone M. Does air quality matter? Evidence from the housing market. J. Polit. Econ. 2005, 113(2):376-424.
8. Clark D.E., Nieves L.A. An interregional hedonic analysis of noxious facility impacts on local wages and property values. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1994, 27(3):235-253.
9. Currie J., Davis L.W., Greenstone M., Walker R. Do housing prices reflect environmental health risks? Evidence from more than 1600 toxic plant openings and closings. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 18700 2013.
10. Davis L.W. The effect of power plants on local housing values and rents. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2011, 93(4):1391-1402.
11. Ekeland I., Heckman J.J., Nesheim L. Identification and estimation of hedonic models. J. Polit. Econ. 2004, 112(1):60-109.
12. Farber S. SURVEY undesirable facilities and property values: a summary of empirical studies. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 24:1-14.
13. Flower P.C., Ragas W.R. The effects of refineries on neighborhood property values. J. Real Estate Res. 1994, 9(3):319-338.
14. Freeman A.M. Property value models. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Resource for the Future 2003.
15. Gamper-Rabindran S., Timmins C. Does cleanup of hazardous waste sites raise housing values? Evidence of spatially localized benefits. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2013, 65(3):354-360.
16. Gayer T., Hamilton J.T., Viscusi W.K. Private values of risk tradeoffs at superfund sites: housing market evidence on learning about risk. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2000, 82(3):439-451.
17. Greenstone M., Gallagher J. Does hazardous waste matter? Evidence from the housing market and the superfund program. Q. J. Econ. 2008, 123(3):951-1003.
18. Greenstone M., Hornbeck R., Moretti E. Identifying agglomeration spillovers: evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. J. Polit. Econ. 2010, 118(3):536-598.
19. Grislain-Letrémy C., Katossky A. L'Impact de l'Industrie à Hauts Risques sur le Prix des Logements. Econ. Stat. 2013, 460-461:79-106.
20. Harrison D.M., Smersh G.T., Schwartz A.L. Environmental determinants of housing prices: the impact of flood zone status. J. Real Estate Res. 2001, 21(1/2):3-20.
21. Kiel K.A., Williams M. The impact of superfund sites on local property values: are all sites the same?. J. Urban Econ. 2007, 61(1):170-192.
22. Kohlhase J.E. The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values. J. Urban Econ. 1991, 30:1-26.
23. Kuminoff N.V., Parmeter C.F., Pope J.C. Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2010, 60(3):145-160.
24. MacDonald D.N., White H.L., Taube P.M., Huth W.L. Flood hazard pricing and insurance premium differentials: evidence from the housing market. J. Risk Insur. 1990, 57(4):654-663.
25. Maslianskaïa-Pautrel M. La Valorisation de la Qualité de l'Air Par l'Approche Hédonique. Une Revue de la Littérature 2008.
26. McMillen D.P. Issues in spatial data analysis. J. Reg. Sci. 2010, 50(1):119-141.
27. McMillen D.P., Redfearn C.L. Estimation and hypothesis testing for nonparametric hedonic house price functions. J. Reg. Sci. 2010, 50(3):712-733.
28. McMillen D.P., Thorsnes P. The aroma of Tacoma: time-varying average derivatives and the effect of a superfund site on house Prices. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 2003, 21(2):237-246.
29. Morgan A. The impact of hurricane ivan on expected flood losses, perceived flood risk, and property values. J. Hous. Res. 2007, 16(1):47-60.
30. Redfearn C.L. How informative are average effects? Hedonic regression and amenity capitalization in complex urban housing markets. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2009, 39(3):297-306.
31. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 1974, 82(1):34-55.
32. Sauvage L. L'Impact du Risque Industriel sur l'Immobilier 1997, Association des Etudes Foncières.
33. Sunding D.L., Swoboda A.M. Hedonic analysis with locally weighted regression: an application to the shadow cost of housing regulation in Southern California. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2010, 40(6):550-573.
34. Travers M., Bonnet E., Chevé M., Appéré G. Risques Industriels et Zone Naturelle Estuarienne : Une Analyse Hédoniste Spatiale. Econ. Prévision 2009, 190-191(4-5):135-158.