Multi-objective optimization of water distribution systems based on a real options approach

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 63, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-13

  Marques, João ^a   Cunha, Maria ^a   Savić, Dragan A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Carbon emissions; Multi objective optimization; Real options; Simulated annealing; Uncertainty; Water networks

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LIFE CYCLE; SIMULATED ANNEALING; WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS;

CARBON EMISSIONS; MULTI OBJECTIVE DECISION MODELS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION MODELS; REAL OPTIONS; SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHMS; UNCERTAINTY; WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; WATER NETWORKS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

ALGORITHM; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; DECISION ANALYSIS; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATED ANNEALING; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84907495047     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahmadi M., Arabi M., Ascough J.C., Fontane D.G., Engel B.A. Toward improved calibration of watershed models: multisite multiobjective measures of information. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 59:135-145.
2. Bandyopadhyay S., Saha S., Maulik U., Deb K. A simulated annealing-based multiobjective optimization algorithm: AMOSA. Evol. Comput. IEEE Trans. 2008, 12(3):269-283.
3. Basupi I., Kapelan Z. Flexible water distribution system design under future demand uncertainty. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2013, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000416.
4. Creaco E., Franchini M. Fast network multi-objective design algorithm combined with an a posteriori procedure for reliability evaluation under various operational scenarios. Urban Water J. 2012, 9(6):385-399.
5. Creaco E., Franchini M., Walski T. Accounting for phasing of construction within the design of water distribution networks. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2014, 140(5):598-606.
6. Cunha M., Sousa J. Hydraulic infrastructures design using simulated annealing. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2001, 7(1):32-39.
7. Dandy G., Roberts A., Hewitson C., Chrystie P. Sustainability objectives for the optimization of water distribution networks. Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symposium 2006 2006, 1-11. American Society of Civil Engineers. W. D. S. A. S (Ed.).
8. De Neufville R., Scholtes S., Wang T. Real options by spreadsheet: parking garage case example. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2006, 12(2):107-111.
9. Dennison F.J., Azapagic A., Clift R., Colbourne J.S. Life cycle assessment: comparing strategic options for the mains infrastructure - part I. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39(10-11):315-319.
10. Di Pierro F., Khu S.-T., Savić D., Berardi L. Efficient multi-objective optimal design of water distribution networks on a budget of simulations using hybrid algorithms. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24(2):202-213.
11. ERSE Comércio Europeu de Licenças de Emissão de Gases com Efeito de estufa 2012, 30.
12. Farmani R., Savic D., Walters G. The simultaneous multi-objective optimization of anytown pipe rehabilitation, tank sizing, tank siting, and pump operation schedules. Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management 2004, 1-10. American Society of Civil Engineers.
13. Fonseca C.M., Fleming P.J. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation discussion and generalization. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms 1993, 416-423. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA.
14. Gersonius B., Ashley R., Pathirana A., Zevenbergen C. Managing the flooding system's resiliency to climate change. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Sustain. 2010, 163(1):15-22.
15. Giuliani M., Galelli S., Soncini-Sessa R. A dimensionality reduction approach for many-objective Markov Decision Processes: application to a water reservoir operation problem. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 57:101-114.
16. Haimes Y.Y. Sustainable operation of threatened infrastructures. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1998, 4(1):1-4.
17. Hakanen J., Sahlstedt K., Miettinen K. Wastewater treatment plant design and operation under multiple conflicting objective functions. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 46:240-249.
18. Hartigan J.A., Wong M.A. Algorithm AS 136: a k-means clustering algorithm. Appl. Stat. 1979, 28(1):100-108.
19. Herstein L., Filion Y., Hall K. Evaluating the environmental impacts of water distribution systems by using EIO-LCA-based multiobjective optimization. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2011, 137(2):162-172.
20. Huang D., Vairavamoorthy K., Tsegaye S. Flexible design of urban water distribution networks. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010, 4225-4236.
21. Kirkpatrick S., G C.D., Vecchi M.P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220(4598):671-680.
22. Marques J.C.R., Cunha M.C., Savic D. Using real options for an eco-friendly design of water distribution systems. J. Hydroinform. 2014, (in press), IWA Publishing 2014. 10.2166/hydro.2014.122.
23. Marques J.C.R., Cunha M.C., Savic D. Using real options in the optimal design of water distribution networks. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2014, (1274). 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000448.
24. Myers S.C. Determinants of corporate borrowing. J. Financ. Econ. 1977, 5(2):147-175.
25. Nembhard H.B., Aktan M. Real options in engineering design, operations, and management. Prod. Plan. Control 2010, 21(7):718-719.
26. Pareto V. Cours d'Economie Politique 1896, Droz, Genève.
27. Prasad T.D., Hong S.-H., Park N. Reliability based design of water distribution networks using multi-objective genetic algorithms. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2003, 7(3):351-361.
28. Rossman, L. A., 2000. Epanet 2 Users Manual. (U. S. E. P. Agency, Ed.) Cincinnati US Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 38(September), 200.
29. Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., Wynn H.P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat. Sci. 1989, 4(4):409-423.
30. Savic D. Single-objective vs. multiobjective optimisation for integrated decision support. Integrated Assessment and Decision 2002, 7-12.
31. Suttinon P., Nasu S. Real options for increasing value in industrial water infrastructure. Water Resour. Manag. 2010, 24(12):2881-2892.
32. Todini E. Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach. Urban Water 2000, 2(2):115-122.
33. Wagner J.M., Shamir U., Marks D.H. Water distribution reliability: simulation methods. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 1988, 114(3):276-294.
34. Walski T.M., Gessler J., Sjostrom J.W. Water distribution systems: simulation and sizing. Environmental Progress 1990, 321. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea. M. Wentzel (Ed.).
35. Woodward M., Gouldby B., Kapelan Z., Khu S.-T., Townend I. Real options in flood risk management decision making. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2011, 4(4):339-349.
36. Wu W., Simpson A.R., Maier H.R. Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions in multiobjective genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution systems. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2010, 136(5):146-155.
37. Zhang S.X., Babovic V. A real options approach to the design and architecture of water supply systems using innovative water technologies under uncertainty. J. Hydroinform. 2012, 14(1):13-29.
38. Zheng F., Zecchin A. An efficient decomposition and dual-stage multi-objective optimization method for water distribution systems with multiple supply sources. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 55:143-155.