Comparison of latent heat flux using aerodynamic methods and using the penman-monteith method with satellite-based surface energy balance

Remote Sensing

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 8844-8877

  Dhungel, Ramesh ^a   Allen, Richard G ^b   Trezza, Ricardo ^b   Robison, Clarence W ^b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Evapotranspiration; Penman Monteith; Surface energy balance; Surface resistance; Surface temperature

Indexed keywords

INTERFACIAL ENERGY; SURFACE RESISTANCE;

AERODYNAMIC METHODS; PENMAN-MONTEITH; PENMAN-MONTEITH METHOD; SURFACE TEMPERATURES;

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION;

EID: 84907473248     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs6098844     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Penman, H.L. Natural evaporation from open, water, bare soil and grass. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1948, 193, 120-145.
2. Mallick, K.; Jarvis, A.J.; Boegh, E.; Fisher, J.B.; Drewry, D.T.; Tu, K.P.; Hook, S.J.; Hulley, G.; Ardö, J.; Beringer, J.; et al. A Surface Temperature Initiated Closure (STIC) for surface energy balance fluxes. Remote Sens. Environm. 2014, 141, 243-261.
3. Tanner, C.B.; Pelton W.L. Potential evapotranspiration estimates by the approximate energy balance method of Penman. J. Geophys. Res. 1960, 65, 3391-3413.
4. Wallace, J.S.; Roberts, J.M.; Sivakumar, M.V.K. The estimation of transpiration from sparse dryland millet using stomatal conductance and vegetation area indices. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1990, 51, 35-49.
5. Stannard, D.I. Comparison of Penman-Monteith, Shuttleworth-Wallace, and Modified Priestley-Taylor evapotranspiration models for wildland vegetation in semiarid rangeland. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29, 1379-1392.
6. Moran, M.S.; Rahman, A.F.; Washburne, J.C.; Goodrich, D.C.; Weltz, M.A.; Kustas, W.P. Combining the Penman-Monteith equation with measurements of surface temperature and reflectance to estimate evaporation rates of semiarid grassland. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1996, 80, 87-109.
7. Thom, A.S.; Oliver, H.R. On Penman's equation for estimating regional evaporation. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 1977, 103, 345-357.
8. De Bruin H.; Holtslag A. A simple parameterization of the surface fluxes of sensible and latent heat during daytime compared with the Penman-Monteith concept. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1982, 21, 1610-1621.
9. Shuttleworth, J.W.; Wallace, J.S. Evaporation of sparse crops-An energy combination theory. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1985, 469, 839-885.
10. Allen, R.G. A Penman for all seasons. J. Lrrig. Drain. Eng. 1987, 112, 348-368.
11. Kustas, W.P.; Stannard, D.I.; Allwine, K.J. Variability in surface energy flux partitioning during Washita '92: Resulting effects on Penman-Monteith and Priestley-Taylor parameters. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1996, 82, 171-193.
12. Alves, I.; Pereira, L.S. Modeling surface resistance from climatic variables? Agric. Water Manag. 2000, 42, 371-385.
13. Gavin, H.; Agnew, C.T. Estimating evaporation and surface resistance from a wet grassland. Phys. Chem. Earth 2003, 25, 599-603.
14. Nandagiri, L.; Kovoor, G.M. Sensitivity of the food and agriculture organization Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration estimates to alternative procedures for estimation of parameters. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2005, 131, 238-248.
15. Allen, R.G.; Pruitt, W.O.; Wright, J.L.; Howell, T.A.; Ventura, F.; Snyder, R.; Itenfisu, D.; Steduto, P.; Berengena, J.; Yrisarry, J.B.; et al. A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method. Agric. Water Manag. 2005, 81, 1-22.
16. Gong, L.; Xu, C.-Y.; Chen, D.; Halldin, S.; Chen, Y.D. Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin. J. Hydrol. 2006, 329, 620-629.
17. Zhao, W.Z.; Ji, X.B.; Kang, E.S.; Zhang, Z.H.; Jin, B.W. Evaluation of Penman-Monteith model applied to a maize field in the arid area of northwest China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14, 1353-1364.
18. Otles, Z.; Gutowski, W.J. Atmospheric stability effects on Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration estimates. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2005, 162, 2239-2254.
19. Mukammal, F.I.; King, K.M.; Cork, H.F. Comparison of aerodynamic and energy budget techniques in estimating evapotranspiration from a cornfield. Archiv für Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Serie B 1966, 14, 384-395.
20. Mahrt, L; Ek, M. The influence of atmospheric stability on potential evaporation. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 1984, 23, 222-234.
21. Lhomme, J.-P; Chehbouni, A.; Monteny, B. Effective parameters of surface energy balance in heterogeneous landscape. Bound.-Lay. Meteorol. 1994, 71, 297-309.
22. Dhungel, R; Allen R.G.; Trezza R; Robison C.W. A simple backward averaged accelerated numerical solution for the simulation of the surface energy balance flux parameters using NARR reanalysis weather data and satellite based METRIC data. University of Idaho, Kimberly, ID, USA. Personal communication, 2014.
23. Allen, R.G.; Tasumi, M.; Trezza, R. Satellite-based energy balance for Mapping Evapotranspiration with Internalized Calibration (METRIC)-Model. ASCE 2007, 133, 380-394.
24. Mesinger, F.; DiMego, G.; Kalnay, E.; Mitchell, K.; Shafran, P.C.; Ebisuzaki, W.; Jovic, D.; Woollen, J.; Rogers, E.; Berbery, E.H.; et al. North american regional reanalysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2006, 87, 343-360.
25. Van de Griend, A.A.; Owe, M. Bare soil surface resistance to evaporation by vapor diffusion under semiarid conditions. Water Resour. Res. 1994, 30, 181-188.
26. Tetens, V.O. Uber einige meteorologische. Begriffe Zeitschrift fur Geophysik 1930, 6, 297-309.
27. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M.; Menentia, M.; Feddesb R.A.; Holtslagc A.A.M. A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 1. Formulation. J. Hydrol. 1998, 212-213, 198-212.
28. Su, Z. The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2002, 6, 85-99.
29. Monteith, J.L. Evaporation and environment. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1965, 19, 205-234.
30. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998.
31. Valiantzas, J.D. Simplified versions for the Penman evaporation equation using routine weather data. J. Hydrol. 2006, 331, 690-702.
32. Walter, I.A.; Allen, R.G.; Elliott, R.; Itenfisu, D.; Brown, P.; Jensen, M.E. Mecham, B.; Howell, T.A.; Snyder, R.; Eching, S.; et al. The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation. Available online: http://www.kimberly.uidaho.edu/water/asceewri/ascestzdetmain2005.pdf (accessed on 18 September 2014).
33. Xu, C.Y.; Singh, V.P. Cross comparison of empirical equations for calculating potential evapotranspiration with data from Switzerland. Water Resour. Manag. 2002, 16, 197-219.
34. Donatelli, M.; Bellocchi, G.; Carlini, L. Sharing knowledge via software components: Models on reference evapotranspiration. Eur. J. Agro. 2006, 24, 186-192.
35. Murray, F.W. On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1967, 6, 203-204.
36. Thom, A.S. Momentum, mass and heat exchange. In Vegetation and the Atmosphere; Monteith, J.L., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1975; Volume 1, pp. 57-109.
37. Monteith, J.L.; Unsworth, M.H. Principles of Environmental Physics; Edward Arnold: London, UK, 1990.
38. Allen, R.; Irmak, A.; Trezza, R.; Hendrickx, J.M.; Bastiaanssen, W.; Kjaersgaard, J. Satellite based ET estimation in agriculture using SEBAL and METRIC. Hydrol. Process. 2011, 25, 4011-4027.
39. Perrier, A. Land surface processes: Vegetation. In Land Surface Processes in Atmospheric General Circulation Models; Eagleson, P., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982; pp. 395-448.
40. Allen, R.G.; Tasumi, M.; Trezza, R.; Kjaersgaard, J. Satellite-Based Energy Balance for Mapping Evapotranspiration with Internalized Calibration (METRIC)-Application Manual; University of Idaho: Kimberly, ID, USA 2007.
41. Dhungel, R.; Allen, R. Time Integration of Evapotranspiration Using a Two Source Surface Energy Balance Model Using NARR Reanalysis Weather and Satellite Based METRIC Data. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Idaho, Kimberly, ID, USA, 2014.
42. Allen, R.G. Ref-ET: Reference Evapotranspiration Calculation Software for FAO and ASCE Standardized Equations; University of Idaho: Kimberly, ID, USA, 2010.
43. Beljaars, A.C.M.; Viterbo, P. The sensitivity of winter evaporation to the formulation of aerodynamic resistance in the ECMWF model. Bound. Lay. Meteorol. 1994, 71, 135-149.
44. Mascart, P.; Noilhan, J.; Giordani, H. A modified parameterization of flux-profile relationships in the surface layer using different roughness length values for heat and momentum. Bound.-Lay. Meteorol. 1995, 72, 331-344.
45. Paw, U. A discussion of the Penman form equations and comparisons of some equations to estimate latent energy flux density. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1992, 57, 297-304.
46. Lankreijer, H.J.M.; Hendriks, M.J.; Klaassen, W. A comparison of models simulating rainfall interception of forests. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1993, 64, 187-199.
47. Brutsaert, W. Evaporation into the Atmosphere, Theory, History and Applications; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1982.
48. Paulson, C.A. The mathematical representation of wind speed and temperature profiles in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. Appl. Meteorol. 1970, 9, 857-861.
49. Webb, E.K. Profile relationships: The log-linear range, and extension to strong stability. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1970, 96, 67-90.
50. Allen, R.G. Penman-Monteith Equation. Available online: http://extension.uidaho.edu/kimberly/ files/2014/06/Penman_Monteith_Encyclopedia_Soils_00399.pdf (accessed on 18 September 2014).