A multichannel gray level co-occurrence matrix for multi/hyperspectral image texture representation

Remote Sensing

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 8424-8445

  Huang, Xin ^a   Liu, Xiaobo ^a   Zhang, Liangpei ^a  

^a Mapping and Remote Sensing   (China)

Author keywords

Classification; Clustering; Gray level co occurrence matrix; Hyperspectral; Multispectral; Sparse representation; Texture

Indexed keywords

TEXTURES;

CLUSTERING; GRAY LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCE MATRIX; HYPERSPECTRAL; MULTI-SPECTRAL; SPARSE REPRESENTATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84907457074     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs6098424     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kitada, K.; Fukuyama, K. Land-use and Land-cover mapping using a gradable classification method. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 1544-1558.
2. Racoviteanu, A.; Williams, M.W. Decision tree and texture analysis for mapping debris-covered glaciers in the Kangchenjunga area, eastern Himalaya. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 3078-3109.
3. Myint, S.W.; Lam, N.S.N.; Tyler, J.M. Wavelets for urban spatial feature discrimination: Comparisons with fractal, spatial autocorrelation, and spatial co-occurrence approaches. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004, 70, 803-812.
4. Dell'Acqua, F.; Gamba, P.; Ferrari, A.; Palmason, J.A.; Benediktsson, J.A.; Arnason, K.A.A.K. Exploiting spectral and spatial information in hyperspectral urban data with high resolution. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2004, 1, 322-326.
5. Haralick, R.M.; Shanmugam, K.; Dinstein, I.H. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1973, 6, 610-621.
6. Zhang, Y. Optimisation of building detection in satellite images by combining multispectral classification and texture filtering. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 1999, 54, 50-60.
7. Franklin, S.E.; Peddle, D.R. Classification of SPOT HRV imagery and texture features. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1990, 11, 551-556.
8. Gong, P.; Marceau, D.J.; Howarth, P.J. A comparison of spatial feature extraction algorithms for land-use classification with SPOT HRV data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1992, 40, 137-151.
9. Puissant, A.; Hirsch, J.; Weber, C. The utility of texture analysis to improve per-pixel classification for high to very high spatial resolution imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26, 733-745.
10. Zhang, L.; Huang, X.; Huang, B.; Li, P. A pixel shape index coupled with spectral information for classification of high spatial resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 2950-2961.
11. Huang, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, P. Classification and extraction of spatial features in urban areas using high-resolution multispectral imagery. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2007, 4, 260-264.
12. Pacifici, F.; Chini, M.; Emery, W.J. A neural network approach using multi-scale textural metrics from very high-resolution panchromatic imagery for urban land-use classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 1276-1292.
13. Lucieer, A.; Stein, A.; Fisher, P. Multivariate texture-based segmentation of remotely sensed imagery for extraction of objects and their uncertainty. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26, 2917-2936.
14. Palm, C. Color texture classification by integrative co-occurrence matrices. Pattern Recognit. 2004, 37, 965-976.
15. Palm, C.; Lehmann, T.M. Classification of color textures by gabor filtering. Mach. Graph. Vis. 2002, 11, 195-219.
16. Rao, C.N.; Sastry, S.S.; Mallika, K.; Tiong, H.S.; Mahalakshmi, K.B. Co-occurrence matrix and its statistical features as an approach for identification of phase transitions of mesogens. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2013, 2, 4531-4538.
17. Clausi, D.A. Comparison and fusion of co-occurrence, Gabor and MRF texture features for classification of SAR sea-ice imagery. Atmos. Ocean 2001, 39, 183-194.
18. Celebi, M.E.; Kingravi, H.A.; Vela, P.A. A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 200-210.
19. Kaur, P.; Soni, A.K.; Gosain, A. A robust kernelized intuitionistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm in segmentation of noisy medical images. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2013, 34, 163-175.
20. Lee, H.; Battle, A.; Raina, R.; Ng, A.Y. Efficient sparse coding algorithms. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2007, 19, 801.
21. Aharon, M.; Elad, M.; Bruckstein, A. The K-SVD: An algorithm for designing of overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representations. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2006, 54, 4311-4322.
22. Mairal, J.; Bach, F.; Ponce, J.; Sapiro, G. Online learning for matrix factorization and sparse coding. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010, 11, 19-60.
23. Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Method) 1996, 58, 267-288.
24. Chang, C.-C.; Lin, C.-J. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Int. Syst. Technol. 2011, 2, 1-27.
25. Foody, G. Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of difference in classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004, 70, 627-633.