Human performance model validation: One size does not fit all

Simulation Series

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 732-736

  Young, Michael J ^a  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human Performance; Model validation

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

HUMAN BEHAVIORS; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODEL; INFLUENCE MODEL; INPUT OUTPUT MODEL; MODEL VALIDATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84907440867     PISSN: 07359276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Pew, R. W. and Baron. S. 1982. "Perspectives on Human Performance Modeling". Proceedings on the Conference on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, Baden-Baden, Germany, Sept.
2. Baron, S., Kruser, D. S., and Messick, B. 1990. Quantitative Modeling of Human Pe ifo rtnance in Complex, Dynamic Systems. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
3. Laughery, K. R. and Corker, K. 1997. "Computer Modeling and Simulation". In Ed. U. Salvendy, Handbook of Human Factors. John Wiley, New York, NY.
4. Gluck, K. A., & Pew, R. W. 2002. "The AMBR Model Comparison Project: Round III -Modeling Category Learning". In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2 1-22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum 1982.
5. Gluck, K. A., & Pew, R. W. (2001a). "Lessons learned and future directions for the AMBR model comparison project". Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavior Representation, 113-121. Orlando, FL: Division of Continuing Education, University of Central Florida. www.sisostds.or/cgf-br/10thlview-papers.htm
6. Gluck, K. A., & Pew, R. W. (2001b). "Overview of the agent-based modeling and behavior representation (AMBR) model comparison project". Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavior Representation, -3 6. Orlando, FL: Division of Continuing Education, University of Central Florida. www sisostds.org/cgf-hr/10thlviewpapers.htm
7. Schunn, C. D., & Wallach, D. (2001). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit in Comparison of Models to Data. Unpublished manuscript.
8. Estes, W. K. 2002. "Traps in the route to models of memory and decision". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2002, 9(1), 3-25.