A randomized controlled trial of comparison on time and rate of cecal and termianl ileal intubation according to adult-colonoscope length: Intermediate versus long

Journal of Korean Medical Science

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 98-105

  Kim, Kwang Min ^a   Lee, Seung Hwa ^a   Lee, Duck Joo ^a   Kim, Kyu Nam ^a   Seo, Sang Wook ^a   Lee, Hyung Suk ^a   Lee, Dong Ryul ^b  

^a Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Wonkwang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Colonoscope length; Colonoscopy; Intubation rate; Intubation time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CECUM; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPE LENGTH; COLONOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEUM; INTUBATION RATE; INTUBATION TIME; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME;

COLONOSCOPE LENGTH; COLONOSCOPY; INTUBATION RATE; INTUBATION TIME;

ADULT; CECUM; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEUM; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84907424648     PISSN: 10118934     EISSN: 15986357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.1.98     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013; 63: 11-30.
2. Sung JJ, Lau JY, Goh KL, Leung WK; Asia Pacific Working Group on Col-orectal Cancer. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: impli-cations for screening. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 871-6.
3. Jung KW, Park S, Kong HJ, Won YJ, Boo YK, Shin HR, Park EC, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality and survival in 2006-2007. J Korean Med Sci 2010; 25: 1113-21.
4. Kim YJ. What is a reasonable screening test for colorectal cancer. J Kore-an Soc Coloproctol 2010; 26: 375.
5. Bertelson NL, Kalkbrenner KA, Merchea A, Dozois EJ, Landmann RG, De Petris G, Young-Fadok TM, Etzioni DA. Colectomy for endoscopical-ly unresectable polyps: how often is it cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 1111-6.
6. Baik SH, Lee KS, Jeong SY, Park YK, Kim HS, Lee DH, Oh HJ, Kim BC; Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. Development of a rating system for digestive system impairments: Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline. J Korean Med Sci 2009; 24: S271-6.
7. Choi YS, Lee JB, Lee EJ, Lee SH, Suh JP, Lee DH, Kim do S, Youk EG. Can endoscopic submucosal dissection technique be an alternative treatment option for a difficult giant (≥ 30 mm) pedunculated colorectal polyp? Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 660-6.
8. Zuber-Jerger I, Endlicher E, Gelbmann CM. Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy. Med Klin (Munich) 2008; 103: 477-81.
9. Kim WH, Cho YJ, Park JY, Min PK, Kang JK, Park IS. Factors affecting in-sertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 600-5.
10. Hsu CM, Lin WP, Su MY, Chiu CT, Ho YP, Chen PC. Factors that influ-ence cecal intubation rate during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 76-80.
11. Bernstein C, Thorn M, Monsees K, Spell R, O'Connor JB. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gas-trointest Endosc 2005; 61: 72-5.
12. Arcovedo R, Larsen C, Reyes HS. Patient factors associated with a faster insertion of the colonoscope. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 885-8.
13. Krishnan P, Sofi AA, Dempsey R, Alaradi O, Nawras A. Body mass index predicts cecal insertion time: the higher, the better. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 439-42.
14. Hsieh YH, Kuo CS, Tseng KC, Lin HJ. Factors that predict cecal insertion time during sedated colonoscopy: the role of waist circumference. J Gas-troenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 215-7.
15. Rex DK. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 60-4.
16. Sola-Vera J, Uceda F, Brotons A, Sáez J, Girona E, Pérez E, Picó MD, Grau C, Sillero C. Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advan-tages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? results of a randomized trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23: 593-7.
17. Barthel J, Hinojosa T, Shah N. Colonoscope length and procedure effi-ciency. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995; 21: 30-2.
18. Dickey W, Garrett D. Colonoscope length and procedure efficiency. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 79-82.
19. Hsieh YH, Zhou AL, Lin HJ. Long pediatric colonoscope versus interme-diate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: e7-10.
20. Shumaker DA, Zaman A, Katon RM. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 172-9.
21. Marshall JB. Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 675-8.
22. Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King PD, Madsen R, Marshall JB. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 314-7.
23. De Silva AP, Kumarasena RS, Perera Keragala SD, Kalubowila U, Niriella M, Dassanayake AS, Pathmeswaran A, de Silva HJ. The prone 12 o'clock position reduces ileal intubation time during colonoscopy compared to the left lateral 6 o'clock (standard) position. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11: 89.
24. Powell N, Hayee BH, Yeoh DP, Rowbotham DS, Saxena V, McNair A. Terminal ileal photography or biopsy to verify total colonoscopy: does the endoscope agree with the microscope? Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 320-5.
25. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Ja-cobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, et al. Quality indicators for colo-noscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 873-85.
26. Lee HL, Eun CS, Lee OY, Jeon YC, Han DS, Sohn JH, Yoon BC, Choi HS, Hahm JS, Lee MH, et al. Significance of colonoscope length in cecal in-sertion time. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 503-8.
27. Lohsiriwat V, Sujarittanakarn S, Akaraviputh T, Lertakyamanee N, Loh-siriwat D, Kachinthorn U. What are the risk factors of colonoscopic per-foration? BMC Gastroenterol 2009; 9: 71.
28. Kim JH, Jeon EJ, Song JH, Lee SH, Jung JH, Cheung DY, Kim JI, Park SH, Kim JK. Colonoscopic perforation during a diagnostic colonoscopy. Ko-rean J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 42: 289-92.
29. Shida T, Katsuura Y, Teramoto O, Kaiho M, Takano S, Yoshidome H, Miyazaki M. Transparent hood attached to the colonoscope: does it real-ly work for all types of colonoscopes? Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2654-8.
30. Cheon YK, Jung IS, Cho YD, Kim JO, Lee MS, Shim CS. A comparative study for usefulness of a variable-stiffness colonoscope to a conventional colonoscope. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 25: 132-6.
31. Westwood DA, Alexakis N, Connor SJ. Transparent cap-assisted colo-noscopy versus standard adult colonoscopy: a systematic review and me-ta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 218-25.
32. Kennedy G, Larson D, Wolff B, Winter D, Petersen B, Larson M. Routine ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy: a useful maneuver? Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2606-8.
33. Jeong SH, Lee KJ, Kim YB, Kwon HC, Sin SJ, Chung JY. Diagnostic value of terminal ileum intubation during colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepa-tol 2008; 23: 51-5.
34. Rey JF, Lambert R; ESGE Quality Assurance Committee. ESGE recom-mendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 901-3.
35. Marshall JB, Brown DN. Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? do reviewers agree? Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 243-8.