Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 312, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 1323-1329

  Chiang, Yuting P ^a   Chikwe, Joanna ^a   Moskowitz, Alan J ^a   Itagaki, Shinobu ^a   Adams, David H ^a   Egorova, Natalia N ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART TAMPONADE; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMATURIA; HEMOPERICARDIUM; HEMOPTYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL HEART VALVE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; AORTA VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; INCIDENCE; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTHESIS; SURVIVAL;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STROKE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84907424624     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.12679     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, e t al; ACC/AHA Task Force Members. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014; 1 29(23):e521-e643.
2. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al; Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Th oracic Surgery (EACTS). Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(19):2451-2496.
3. Buie VC, OwingsMF, DeFrances CJ, Golosinskiy A. National Hospital Discharg e Survey: 2006 Annual Summary. Vital Health Stat 13. 2010;13(168): 1-70. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr-13/sr13-168.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2014.
4. Chikwe J, Filsoufi F, Carpentier AF. Prosthetic valve selection for middle-Aged patients with aortic stenosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7(12):711-719.
5. Kaneko T, Cohn LH, Aranki SF. Tissue valve is the preferred option for patients aged 60 and older. Circulation. 2013;128(12):1365-1371.
6. Suri RM, Schaff HV. Selection of aortic valve prostheses: contemporary reappraisal of mechanical versus biologic valve substitutes. Circulation. 2013;128(12):1372-1380.
7. Grunkemeier GL, Li HH, Naftel DC, Starr A, Rahimtoola SH. Long-term performance of heart valve prostheses. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2000;25(2): 73-154.
8. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, HendersonWG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized tr ial. J AmColl Cardiol. 2000;36(4):1152-1158.
9. Oxenham H, Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, et al. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Heart. 2003;89(7):715-721.
10. Stassano P, Di Tommaso L, Monaco M, et al. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years. J AmColl Cardiol. 2009;54(20):1862-1868.
11. Brown ML, Schaff HV, Lahr BD, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical vers us biologic prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(4): 878-884.
12. Ruel M,Masters RG,Rubens FD,et al. Late incidence and determinants of stroke after aortic and mitral valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 78(1 77-84.
13. McClure RS,McGurk S, Cevasco M, et al. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aor tic position: a propensity-matched analysis [published online January 15, 2014]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. doi:10.1016/jtcvs.2013.12.042.
14. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41-55.
15. Davierwala PM, Borger MA, David TE, Rao V, MagantiM, Yau TM. Reoperation is not an independent predict or of mortality during aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131 (2):329-335.
16. Potter DD, Sundt TM III, Zehr KJ, et al. Operative risk of reoperative aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129 (1):94-103.
17. Breglio A, Anyanwu A, Itagaki S, Polanco A, Adams DH, Chikwe J. Does prior coronary bypass surgery present a unique risk for re operative valve surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(5):1603-1608.
18. Dvir D,Webb J, Brecker S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: results from th e global valve-in-valve registry. Circulation. 2012;126 (19):2335-2344.
19. Koertke H, Zittermann A,Wagner O, et al. Efficacy and safety of very low-dose self-management of oral anticoagulation in p atients with mechanical heart valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(5):1487-1493.
20. Hering D, Piper C, Bergemann R, et al. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications following St. Jude Medical valve replacement: results of the German Experience With Low-Intensity Anticoagulation study. Chest. 2005; 127(1):53-59.
21. Ruel M, Kulik A, Lam BK, et al. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(3):425-433.
22. Brown JM, O'Brien SM,Wu C, Sikora JA, Griffith BP, Gammie JS. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the S ociety of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(1): 82-90.
23. Kulik A, Bé dard P, Lam BK, et al. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-Aged patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(3):485-491.