Discourses of transdisciplinarity: Looking back to the future

Futures

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 68-74

  Klein, Julie Thompson ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Complexity; Contextualization; Problem solving; Transcendence; Transdisciplinarity; Transgression

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CULTURE; FUTURE PROSPECT; HUMAN RIGHTS; KNOWLEDGE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; STAKEHOLDER; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY;

GREECE;

EID: 84907396343     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 35(2S:A1-A8):S77-S252. (Special supplement on science of team science).
2. Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., & Michaud, G. (Eds.). (1972). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Jantsch, E. Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation (pp. 97-121)
3. Lichnerowicz. Mathematic and transdisciplinarity (pp 121-127)
4. Piaget, J. The epistemology ofinterdisciplinary relationships (pp. 127-139).
5. Augsburg T. Becoming transdisciplinary: The emergence of the transdisciplinary individual. World Futures 2014, 70:1-14.
6. Bammer G. Disciplining interdisciplinarity: Integration and implementation sciences for researching complex real-world problems 2013, ANU E-PR, Canberra.
7. Baxi U. Transdisciplinarity and transformative praxis. Transdisciplinarity: Recreating integrated knowledge 2000, 77-85. EOLSS, Oxford, UK. M. Somerville, D. Rapport (Eds.).
8. Bergmann M., Jahn T., Knobloch T., Krohn W., Pohl C., Schramm E. Methoden transdisziplinarer forschung: Ein uberblick mit anwendungsbeispielen 2012, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, New York.
9. Bhaskar R. Contexts of interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinarity and climate change. Interdisciplinarity and climate change: Transforming knowledge and practice for our global futures 2010, 1-24. Routledge, London/NY. R. Bhaskar, C. Frank, K.G. Hoyer, P. Naess, J. Parker (Eds.).
10. Camic C., Joas H. The dialogical turn. The dialogical turn: New roles for sociology in the postdisciplinary age 2004, 1-19. Bowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD. C. Camic, H. Joas (Eds.).
11. Center for Educational Research Innovation The University and the community: The problems of changing relationships 1982, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
12. Centre International de Recherches et Études Transdisciplinaries. Available from Accessed 30.03.14. http://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/index.php.
13. Committee on Convergence.National Research Council of the National Academies Convergence: Transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond 2014, The National Academies Pr, Washington, DC.
14. A vision of transdiscipinarity: Laying foundations for a world knowledge dialogue 2008, CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL. F. Darbellay, M. Cockell, J. Billotte, F. Waldvogel (Eds.).
15. Dölling I., Hark S. She who speaks shadow speaks truth: Transdisciplinarity in women's and gender studies. Signs 2000, 25(4):1195-1198.
16. Doucet I., Janssens N. Editorial: Transdisciplinarity, the hybridization of knowledge production and space-related research. Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: Towards hybrid modes of inquiry 2011, 1-14. Springer, Dordrecht. I. Doucet, N. Janssens (Eds.).
17. Du Plessis H., Sehume J., Martin L. The concept and application of transdisciplinarity in intellectual discourse and research 2001, Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflections (MISTRA), Johannesburg.
18. Fisher D. Fundamental development of the social sciences: Rockefeller philanthropy and the United States Social Science Research Council 1993, University of Michigan Pr, Ann Arbor.
19. Frodeman R. Sustainable knowledge: A theory of interdisciplinarity 2014, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.
20. Funtowicz S.O., Ravetz J.R. The emergence of post-normal science. Science, politics, and morality: Scientific uncertainty and decision making 1993, 85-123. Kluwer, Dordrecht. R. von Schomberg (Ed.).
21. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies 1994, Sage, Newbury Park, CA/London.
22. Transdisciplinary sustainability studies: A heuristic approach 2014, Routledge, Milton Park and New York. K. Huutoniemi, P. Tapio (Eds.).
23. Institute for interdisciplinary research and journal of interdisciplinary studies. Available from Accessed 30.03.14. http://www.jis3.org/aboutiir.htm.
24. Integral Review: A transdisciplinary and transcultural journal for new thought, research, and praxis. Available from Accessed 30.03.14. http://integral-review.org/.
25. Kellner D. Postmodernism as social theory: Some challenges and problems. Theory, Culture, and Society 1988, 5(2-3):239-246.
26. Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society 2001, Birkhauser, Basel. J.T. Klein (Ed.).
27. Kockelmans J. Why interdisciplinarity?. Interdisciplinarity and higher education 1979, 123-160. Pennsylvania State University Pr, University Park. J. Kockelmans (Ed.).
28. Krohn W. Interdisciplinary cases and disciplinary knowledge. The oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity 2010, 31-49. Oxford University Pr, New York. R. Frodeman, J.T. Klein, C. Mitcham (Eds.).
29. McDonald D., Bammer G., Deane P. Research integration using dialogue methods 2009, Australian National University, Canberra, Available from http://epress.anu.edu.au/dialogue_methods_citation.html Accessed 30.03.14.
30. Miller R. Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences. Issues in Integrative Studies 1982, 1:l-l37.
31. National Cancer Institute Team Science Toolkit. Available from Accessed 30.03.14. https://www.teamsciencetoolkit.cancer.gov/public/home.aspx%3Fjs=1.
32. Network for Transdisciplinary Research (td-net). Available from Accessed 30.03.14. http://www.transdisciplinarity.ch/e/index.php.
33. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty 2001, Polity Pr, Cambridge.
34. Rittel H.W.J., Webber M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 1972, l41(4):155-169.
35. Sardar Z. The namesake: Futures; futures studies; futurology; futuristic: Foresight - What's in a name?. Futures 2010, 42:177-184.
36. Schleifer R. A new kind of work: Publishing, theory, and cultural studies. Disciplining English: Alternative histories, critical perspectives 2002, 179-194. State University of New York Pr, Albany. E. Shumway, C. Dionne (Eds.).
37. The ATLAS. Academy of transdisciplinary learning and advanced study. Available from Accessed 30.03.14. http://www.theatlasnet.org/.
38. The Third Revolution The convergence of the life sciences, physical sciences, and engineering 2011, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Washington, DC, Available from web.mit.edu/dc/Policy/MIT%20White%20Paper%20on%20Convergence.pdf Accessed 30.03.14.
39. Vickers J. [U]framed in open, unmapped fields: Teaching and the practice of interdisciplinarity. Arachne: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Humanities 1997, 4(2):11-42.
40. Weingart P. Interdisciplinarity: The paradoxical discourse. Practicing interdisciplinarity 2000, 25-41. University of Toronto Pr, Toronto. P. Weingart, N. Stehr (Eds.).