How women's sexual orientation guides accuracy of interpersonal judgements of other women

Cognition and Emotion

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1512-1521

  Ruben, Mollie A ^a   Hill, Krista M ^a   Hall, Judith A ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Emotion recognition; Empathic accuracy; Interpersonal accuracy; Personality judgement; Sexual orientation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FEMALE; HOMOSEXUAL FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LESBIANISM; NORMAL HUMAN; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; THINKING; ADOLESCENT; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMAN RELATION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HOMOSEXUALITY, FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; JUDGMENT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907389196     PISSN: 02699931     EISSN: 14640600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.890093     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. (1999). Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 538–547. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.538
2. Barrett, L. F., & Swim, J. K. (1998). Appraisals of prejudice and discrimination. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 11–36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275–278 doi:10.1037//0096-3445.121.3.275
4. Gates, G. J., & Newport, F. (2013, February 15). LGBT percentage highest in D.C., lowest in North Dakota. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/160517/lgbt-percentage-highest-lowest-north-dakota.aspx
5. Gaudio, R. P. (1994). Sounding gay: Pitch properties in speech of gay and straight men. American Speech, 69(1), 30–57. doi:10.2307/455948
6. Gesn, P. R., & Ickes, W. (1999). The development of meaning contexts for empathic accuracy: channel and sequence effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 746–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.746
7. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
8. Hall, J. A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2007). Sources of accuracy in the empathic accuracy paradigm. Emotion, 7, 438–446. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.438
9. Ickes, W., Bissonnette, V., Garcia, S., & Stinson, L. L. (1990). Implementing and using the dyadic interaction paradigm. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 11. Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 16–44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Isaacowitz, D. M., Lockenhoff, C. E., Lane, R. D., Wright, R., Sechrest, L., Riedel, R., & Costa, P. T. (2007). Age differences in recognition of emotion in lexical stimuli and facial expressions. Psychology and Aging, 22, 147–159. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.147
11. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
12. Johnson, K. L., Gill, S., Reichman, V., & Tassinary, L. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 321–334. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.321
13. Linville, S. E. (1998). Acoustic correlates of perceived versus actual sexual orientation in men's speech. Pholia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 50(1), 35–48. doi:10.1159/000021447
14. Maccoby, E. E. (2002). Gender and group process: A developmental perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(2), 54–58. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00167
15. Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–330). San Diego: Academic Press.
16. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
17. Rae, G. (1976). Table of A'. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 98.
18. Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., Jr., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019–1028. doi:10.1037/a0013194
19. Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., & Hallett, K. C. (2009). Female sexual orientation is perceived accurately, rapidly, and automatically from the face and its features. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1245–1251. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.010
20. See, J. E., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Howe, S. R. (1997). Vigilance and signal detection theory: An empirical evaluation of five measures of response bias. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(1), 14–29. doi:10.1518/001872097778940704
21. Shelp, S. G. (2002). Gaydar: Visual detection of sexual orientation among gay and straight men. Journal of Homosexuality, 44, 1–14. doi:10.1300/J082v44n01_01
22. Smyth, R., Jacobs, G., & Rogers, H. (2003). Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society, 32, 329–350. doi:10.1017/S0047404503323024
23. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). New York, NY: Academic Press.
24. Tabak, J. A., & Zayas, V. (2012). The roles of featural and configural face processing in snap judgments of sexual orientation. PLoSONE, 7(5), 1–7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036671
25. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14(1), 59.