Urban green and blue: Who values what and where?

Land Use Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2015, Pages 194-209

  Sander, Heather A ^a   Zhao, Chang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic valuation; Urban environmental amenities; Urban planning; Urban sustainability

Indexed keywords

AMENITY; GREENSPACE; METROPOLITAN AREA; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING; VALUATION; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; PROTECTED AREA; WETLAND;

MINNESOTA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84907379941     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.021     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19:716-723.
2. Anderson S.T., West S.E. Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2006, 36:773-789.
3. Anselin L., Bera A.K. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics 1998, 237-289. Michael Dekker, New York. A. Ullah, D.E.A. Giles (Eds.).
4. Asaber P.K., Huffman F.E. The relative impacts of trails and greenbelts on home price. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 2009, 38:408-419.
5. Barthel S., Folke C., Colding J. Social-ecological memory in gardening: retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 2010, 20:255-265.
6. Barthel S., Sorlin S., Ljungqvist J. Innovative memory and resilient cities: echoes from ancient Constantinople. The Urban Mind 2010, 391-405. Uppsala University Press, Uppsala. P. Sinclair, F. Herschend, C. Isendahl, G. Nordquist (Eds.).
7. Bishop I.D., Lange E., Mahbubul A.M. Estimation of the influence of view components on high-rise apartment pricing using a public survey and GIS modeling. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2004, 31:439-452.
8. Bourassa S.C., Hoesli M., Sun J. What's in a view?. Environ. Plan. A 2004, 36:1427-1450.
9. Bowler D.E., Buyung-Ali L., Knight T.M., Pullin A.S. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 97:147-155.
10. Cavailhès J., Brossard T., Foltête J.-C., Hilal M., Joly D., Tourneux F.-P., Tritz C., Wavresky P. GIS-based hedonic pricing of landscape. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2009, 44:571-590.
11. Cho S.-H., Bowker J.M., Park W.M. Measuring the contribution of water and green space amenities to housing values: an application and comparison of spatially weighted hedonic models. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2006, 31:485-507.
12. Cho S-H., Clark C.D., Park W.M., Kim S.G. Spatial and temporal variation in the housing market values of lot size and open space. Land Econ. 2009, 85:51-73.
13. Cho S-H., Jung S., Kim S.G. Valuation of spatial configurations and forest types in the Southern Appalachian Highlands. Environ. Manage. 2009, 43:628-644.
14. Cho S.-H., Kim S.G., Roberts R.K., Jung S. Amenity values of spatial configurations of forest landscapes over space and time in the Southern Appalachian Highlands. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2646-2657.
15. Cho S.-H., Lambert D.M., Roberts R.K., Kim S.G. Moderating urban sprawl: is there a balance between shared open space and housing parcel size?. J. Econ. Geogr. 2010, 10:763-783.
16. Cho S-H., Poudyal N.C., Roberts R.K. Spatial analysis of the amenity value of green open space. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 6:403-416.
17. Colding J., Barthel S. The potential of 'Urban Green Commons' in the resilience building of cities. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86:156-166.
18. Conway D., Li C.Q., Wolch J., Kahle C., Jerrett M. A spatial autocorrelation approach for examining the effects of urban greenspace on residential property values. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 2010, 41:150-169.
19. Cressie N.A.C. Statistics for Spatial Data 1993, 928. Wiley, New York.
20. Depietri Y., Renaud F.G., Kallis G. Heat waves and floods in urban areas: a policy-oriented review of ecosystem services. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7:95-107.
21. Des Rosiers F., Thériault M., Kestens Y., Villeneuve P. Landscaping and house values: an empirical investigation. J. Real Estate Res. 2002, 23:139-161.
22. Dombrow J., Rodriguez M., Sirmans C.F. The market value of mature trees in single-family housing markets. Apprais. J. 2000, 68:39-43.
23. Earnhart D. Using contingent-pricing analysis to value open space and its duration at residential locations. Land Econ. 2006, 82:17-35.
24. Fortin M.J., Dale M.R.T. Spatial Analysis - A Guide for Ecologists 2005, 377. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., Charlton M.E. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships 2002, 284. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex, England.
26. Freeman A.M. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values, Theory and Methods 2003, 513. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. 2nd ed.
27. Geoghegan J. The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy 2002, 19:91-98.
28. Geoghegan J., Wainger L.A., Bockstael N.E. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecol. Econ. 1997, 23:251-264.
29. Haining R. Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice 2003, 454. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Holmes T.P., Murphy E.A., Bell K.P. Exotic forest insects and residential property values. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2006, 35:155-166.
31. Homer C., Huang C., Yang L., Wylie B., Coan M. Development of a 2001 National Landcover Database for the United States. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004, 70:829-840.
32. Huang C., Homer C., Yang L. Regional forest land cover characterization using Landsat type data. Methods and Applications for Remote Sensing of Forests: Concepts and Case Studies 2003, 398-410. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. M. Wulder, S. Franklin (Eds.).
33. Irwin E.G. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Econ. 2002, 78:465-480.
34. Jim C.Y., Chen W.Y. Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China). Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 78:422-434.
35. Jim C.Y., Chen W.Y. Value of scenic views: hedonic assessment of private housing in Hong Kong. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 91:226-234.
36. Jim C.Y., Chen W.Y. External effects of neighbourhood parks and landscape elements on high-rise residential value. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:662-670.
37. Kestens Y., Thériault M., Des Rosiers F. The impact of surrounding land use and vegetation on single-family house prices. Environ. Plan. B 2004, 31:539-567.
38. Kovacs K., Václavík T., Haight R.G., Pang A., Cunniffe N.J., Gilligan C.A., Meentemeyer R.K. Predicting the economic costs and property values losses attributed to sudden oak death damage in California (2010-2020). J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92:1292-1302.
39. Krasny M. Children jump into community gardens: what springs out?. The Case for a Community Greening Research Agenda 2009, 49-60. American Community Gardening Association, Columbus, OH. K.G. Tidball, M. Krasny, K. Faurest (Eds.).
40. Lake I.R., Lovett A.A., Bateman I.J., Day B. Using GIS and large-scale digital data to implement hedonic pricing studies. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2000, 14:521-541.
41. Lake I.R., Lovett A.A., Bateman I.J., Day B. Improving land compensation procedures via GIS and hedonic pricing. Environ. Plan. C-Gov. Policy 2000, 18:681-696.
42. Larson E.K., Perrings C. The value of water-related amenities in an arid city: the case of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109:45L 55.
43. Levkoe C. Learning democracy through food justice movements. Agric. Hum. Values 2006, 23:89-98.
44. Li W., Saphores J-D. A spatial hedonic analysis of the value of urban land cover in the multifamily housing market in Los Angeles, CA. Urban Stud. 2012, 29:2597-2615.
45. Luttik J. The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2000, 48:161-167.
46. Lutzenhiser M., Netusil N.R. The effect of open spaces on a home's sale price. Contemp. Econ. Policy 2001, 19:291-298.
47. Manes F., Incerti G., Salvatori E., Vitale M., Ricotta C., Constanza R. Urban ecosystem services: tree diversity and stability of tropospheric ozone removal. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22:349-369.
48. Mansfield C., Pattanayak S.K., McDow W., McDonald R., Halpin P. Shades of green: measuring the value of urban forests in the housing market. J. For. Econ. 2005, 11:177-199.
49. Morales D.J. The contribution of trees to residential property value. J. Arboricult. 1980, 6:305-308.
50. Morales D.J., Micha F.R., Weber R.L. The contribution of trees to residential property value: Manchester, Connecticut. Valuation 1976, 23:26-43.
51. Munroe D.K. Exploring the determinants of spatial pattern in residential land markets: amenities and disamenities in Charlotte, NC, USA. Environ. Plan. B 2007, 34:336-354.
52. Netusil N.R., Chattopadhyay S., Kovacs K.F. Estimating the demand for tree canopy: a second-stage hedonic price analysis in Portland, Oregon. Land Econ. 2010, 86:281-293.
53. Price J.I., McCollum D.W., Berrens R.P. Insect infestation and residential property values a hedonic analysis of the mountain pine beetle epidemic. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12:415-422.
54. Sadler J., Bates A., Hale J., James P. Bringing cities alive: the importance of urban green spaces for people and biodiversity. Urban Ecology 2010, 230-260. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. K. Gaston (Ed.).
55. Saldivar-Tanaka L., Krasny M. Culturing community development, neighborhood open space, and civic agriculture: the case of Latino community gardens in New York City. Agric. Hum. Values 2004, 21:399-412.
56. Sander H.A., Haight R.G. Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urban area using hedonic pricing. J. Environ. Manage. 2012, 113:194-205.
57. Sander H.A., Manson S.M. Heights and location of artificial structures in viewshed calculation: how close is close enough?. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 82:257-270.
58. Sander H.A., Polasky S. The value of views and open space: estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:837-845.
59. Sander H.A., Polasky S., Haight R.G. The value of urban tree cover: a hedonic property price model in Ramsey and Dakota County, Minnesota, USA. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1646-1656.
60. Saphores J-D., Li W. Estimating the value of urban green areas: a hedonic pricing analysis of the single family housing market in Los Angeles, CA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 103:373-387.
61. Tajima K. New estimates of the demand for urban green space: implications for valuing the environmental benefits of Boston's big dig project. J. Urban Aff. 2003, 25:641-655.
62. Thompson R., Hanna R., Noel J., Piirto D. Valuation of tree aesthetics on small urban-interface properties. J. Arboricult. 1999, 25:225-234.
63. Tyrväinen L., Miettinen A. Property prices and urban forest amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2000, 39:205-223.
64. Tzoulas K., Korpela K., Venn S., Yli-Pelkonen V., Kaźmierczak A., Niemela J., James P. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 81:167-178.
65. Waltert F., Schläpfer F. Landscape amenities and local development; a review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 70:141-152.
66. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance-matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980, 48:817-838.
67. White M.P., Alcock I., Wheeler B.W., Depledge M.H. Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 24:920-928.
68. White M.P., Pahl S., Ashbullby K., Herbert S., Depledge M.H. Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 35:40-51.
69. Wu J.J., Adams R.M., Plantinga A.J. Amenities in an urban equilibrium model: residential development in Portland, Oregon. Land Econ. 2004, 80:19-32.
70. Yu D., Wei Y.D., Wu C. Modeling spatial dimensions of housing prices in Milwaukee, WI. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 2007, 34:1085-1102.