Diagnostic accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement for the detection of raised intracranial pressure: Meta-analysis: A systematic review

Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 680-687

  Yavin, Daniel ^a,b   Luu, Judy ^a,b   James, Matthew T ^a,b   Roberts, Derek J ^a,b   Sutherland, Garnette R ^a,c   Jette, Nathalie ^a,b,c   Wiebe, Samuel ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Diagnostic accuracy; Intracranial hypertension; Intracranial pressure; Intraocular pressure; Meta analysis; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COCHRANE LIBRARY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EMBASE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ED = EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT; ICP = INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; ICU = INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; IOP = INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LP = LUMBAR PUNCTURE; META-ANALYSIS; QUADAS = QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY STUDIES; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84907363141     PISSN: 00223085     EISSN: 19330693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.JNS13932     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Baurmann M: Über die Entstehung und klinische Bedeutung des Netzhautvenenpulses. Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 45:53-59, 1925
2. Blank W, Spring A: Brain death and intraocular pressure. Neurosurg Rev 11:19-23, 1988
3. Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Altman DG: sbe24: metan - an alternative meta-analysis command. Stata Tech Bull 44:4-15, 1998
4. Czarnik T, Gawda R, Kolodziej W, Latka D, Sznajd-Weron K, Weron R: Associations between intracranial pressure, intraocular pressure and mean arterial pressure in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic brain injuries. Injury 40:33-39, 2009
5. Czarnik T, Gawda R, Latka D, Kolodziej W, Sznajd-Weron K, Weron R: Noninvasive measurement of intracranial pressure: is it possible? J Trauma 62:207-211, 2007
6. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177-188, 1986
7. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629-634, 1997
8. Fagan TJ: Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 293:257, 1975 (Letter)
9. Firsching R, Schütze M, Motschmann M, Behrens-Baumann W: Venous opthalmodynamometry: a noninvasive method for assessment of intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 93:33-36, 2000
10. Fischer RA: On the "probable error" of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron 1:3-32, 1921
11. Han Y, McCulley TJ, Horton JC: No correlation between intraocular pressure and intracranial pressure. Ann Neurol 64:221-224, 2008
12. Hansen HC, Helmke K: The subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerves. An ultrasound study of the optic nerve sheath. Surg Radiol Anat 18:323-328, 1996
13. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG: Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557-560, 2003
14. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL: Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990
15. Kirk T, Jones K, Miller S, Corbett J: Measurement of intraocular and intracranial pressure: is there a relationship? Ann Neurol 70:323-326, 2011
16. Lashutka MK, Chandra A, Murray HN, Phillips GS, Hiestand BC: The relationship of intraocular pressure to intracranial pressure. Ann Emerg Med 43:585-591, 2004
17. Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PM: Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med 149:889-897, 2008
18. Lehman RA, Krupin T, Podos SM: Experimental effect of intracranial hypertension upon intraocular pressure. J Neurosurg 36:60-66, 1972
19. Li Z, Yang Y, Lu Y, Liu D, Xu E, Jia J, et al: Intraocular pressure vs intracranial pressure in disease conditions: a prospective cohort study (Beijing iCOP study). BMC Neurol 12:66, 2012
20. Lozier AP, Sciacca RR, Romagnoli MF, Connolly ES Jr: Ventriculostomy- related infections: a critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery 62 (Suppl 2):688-700, 2008
21. Maniker AH, Vaynman AY, Karimi RJ, Sabit AO, Holland B: Hemorrhagic complications of external ventricular drainage. Neurosurgery 59 (4 Suppl 2):ONS419-ONS425, 2006
22. Minckler DS, Baerveldt G, Heuer DK, Quillen-Thomas B, Walonker AF, Weiner J: Clinical evaluation of the Oculab Tono-Pen. Am J Ophthalmol 104:168-173, 1987
23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264-269, 2009
24. Morgan WH, Lind CR, Kain S, Fatehee N, Bala A, Yu DY: Retinal vein pulsation is in phase with intracranial pressure and not intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:4676-4681, 2012
25. Muchnok T, Deitch K, Giraldo P: Can intraocular pressure measurements be used to screen for elevated intracranial pressure in emergency department patients? J Emerg Med 43:532-537, 2012
26. 2α on canine carotid arterial blood flow, cerebrospinal fluid pressure, and intraocular pressure. J Neurosurg 38:32-39, 1973
27. Narayan RK, Kishore PR, Becker DP, Ward JD, Enas GG, Greenberg RP, et al: Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 56:650-659, 1982
28. Pickard JD, Czosnyka M: Management of raised intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 56:845-858, 1993
29. Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR: Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 299: 926-930, 1978
30. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH: Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 58:982-990, 2005
31. Ren R, Zhang X, Wang N, Li B, Tian G, Jonas JB: Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in ocular hypertension. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 89:e142-e148, 2011
32. Sajjadi SA, Harirchian MH, Sheikhbahaei N, Mohebbi MR, Malekmadani MH, Saberi H: The relation between intracranial and intraocular pressures: study of 50 patients. Ann Neurol 59:867-870, 2006
33. Salman MS: Can intracranial pressure be measured non-invasively? Lancet 350:1367, 1997
34. Saul TG, Ducker TB: Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive treatment on mortality in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 56:498-503, 1982
35. Sheeran P, Bland JM, Hall GM: Intraocular pressure changes and alterations in intracranial pressure. Lancet 355:899, 2000
36. Spentzas T, Henricksen J, Patters AB, Chaum E: Correlation of intraocular pressure with intracranial pressure in children with severe head injuries. Pediatr Crit Care Med 11:593-598, 2010
37. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J: The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25, 2003