Graph-based local coherence modeling

ACL 2013 - 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 93-103

  Guinaudeau, Camille ^a   Strube, Michael ^a  

^a HEIDELBERG INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL STUDIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

COHERENCE MODELS; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; FACE DATA; GRAPH-BASED; GRID-BASED APPROACH; SENTENCE ORDERING; TRAINING PHASE;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 84907352674     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Regina Barzilay and Noemie Elhadad. 2003. Sentence alignment for monolingual comparable corpora. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sapporo, Japan, 11-12 July 2003, pages 25-32.
2. Regina Barzilay and Mirella Lapata. 2005. Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, Mich., 25-30 June 2005, pages 141-148.
3. Regina Barzilay and Mirella Lapata. 2008. Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Computational Linguistics, 34(1):1-34.
4. Susan E. Brennan, Marilyn W. Friedman, and Carl J. Pollard. 1987. A centering approach to pronouns. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford, Cal., 6-9 July 1987, pages 155-162.
5. Jill Burstein, Joel Tetreault, and Slava Andreyev. 2010. Using entity-based features to model coherence in student essays. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies 2010: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles, Cal., 2-4 June 2010, pages 681-684.
6. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Genoa, Italy, 22-28 May 2006, pages 449-454.
7. Micha Elsner and Eugene Charniak. 2008. Coreference-inspired coherence modeling. In Proceedings ACL-HLT 2008 Conference Short Papers, Columbus, Ohio, 15-20 June 2008, pages 41-44.
8. Micha Elsner and Eugene Charniak. 2011. Extending the entity grid with entity-specific features. In Proceedings of the ACL 2011 Conference Short Papers, Portland, Oreg., 19-24 June 2011, pages 125-129.
9. Micha Elsner, Joseph Austerweil, and Eugene Charniak. 2007. A unified local and global model for discourse coherence. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Rochester, N. Y., 22-27 April 2007, pages 436-443. Read this version: http://www.cs.brown.edu/melsner/order.pdf.
10. Katja Filippova and Michael Strube. 2007. Extending the entity-grid coherence model to semantically related entities. In Proceedings of the 11th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, 17-20 June 2007, pages 139-142.
11. Barbara J. Grosz, Aravind K. Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203-225.
12. Thorsten Joachims. 2002. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 23-26 July 2002, pages 133-142.
13. Nikiforos Karamanis, Chris Mellish, Massimo Poesio, and Jon Oberlander. 2009. Evaluating centering for information ordering using corpora. Computational Linguistics, 35(1):29-46.
14. Rodger Kibble and Richard Power. 2004. Optimizing referential coherence in text generation. Computational Linguistics, 30(4):401-416.
15. Ziheng Lin, Hwee Tou Ng, and Min-Yen Kan. 2011. Automatically evaluating text coherence using discourse relations. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oreg., 19-24 June 2011, pages 997-1006.
16. Sebastian Martschat, Jie Cai, Samuel Broscheit, Éva Mújdricza-Maydt, and Michael Strube. 2012. A multigraph model for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the Shared Task of the 16th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Jeju Island, Korea, 12-14 July 2012, pages 100-106.
17. Neil McIntyre and Mirella Lapata. 2010. Plot induction and evolutionary search for story generation. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden, 11-16 July 2010, pages 1562-1572.
18. Rada Mihalcea and Dragomir Radev. 2011. Graphbased Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
19. Eleni Miltsakaki and Karen Kukich. 2004. Evaluation of text coherence for electronic essay scoring systems. Natural Language Engineering, 10(1):25-55.
20. Roberto Navigli and Mirella Lapata. 2010. An experimental study of graph connectivity for unsupervised word sense disambiguation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(4):678-692.
21. Mark E. J. Newman. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York, N. Y.
22. Massimo Poesio, Rosemary Stevenson, Barbara Di Eugenio, and Janet Hitzeman. 2004. Centering: A parametric theory and its instantiations. Computational Linguistics, 30 (3). 309-363.
23. Sameer Pradhan, Alessandro Moschitti, and Nianwen Xue. 2012. CoNLL-2012 Shared Task: Modeling multilingual unrestricted coreference in OntoNotes. In Proceedings of the Shared Task of the 16th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Jeju Island, Korea, 12-14 July 2012, pages 1-40.
24. Sarah E. Schwarm and Mari Ostendorf. 2005. Reading level assessment using support vector machines and statistical language models. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, Mich., 25-30 June 2005, pages 523-530.
25. Radu Soricut and Daniel Marcu. 2006. Discourse generation using utility-trained coherence models. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia, 17-21 July 2006, pages 1105-1112.