What Role can Rational Argument Play in ADR and Online Dispute Resolution?

Proceedings of the 2nd International ODR Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 69-76

  Walton, Douglas N ^a   Lodder, Arno R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

^b CEDIRE Centre for Electronic Dispute Resolution   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION; ARGUMENTATION MODEL; ARGUMENTATION THEORY; FORMAL MODEL; FORMAL PROPERTIES; HIGH STANDARDS; NEGOTIATION MODELS; ON-LINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION;

EID: 84907342910     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bench-Capon, T. (1997), 'Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law', Artificial Intelligence and Law, 5, 1997, 249-261.
2. Fisher, R. and W. Ury (1991), Getting to Yes, New York, Penguin Books, 1991.
3. Gordon, T.F. & G. Richter, 'Discourse Support Systems for Deliberative Democracy', eGovernment: State of the Art and Perspectives (EGOV), eds Roland Traunmuller and Klaus Lenk, Aix-en-Provence, Springer Verlag, 2002, 248-255.
4. Gordon, T.F. & O. Marker (2003), ' Mediation Systems', in: O. Märker & M. Trénel (red.), Online-Mediation. Neue Medien in Der Konfliktvermittlung - Mit Beispielen Aus Politik Und Wirtschaft, Berlin: Edition Sigma 2003, p. 23-45.
5. Grice, H.P. (1975), 'Logic and Conversation', The Logic of Grammar, ed. Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman, Encino, Dickenson, 1975, 64-75.
6. Hamblin, C.L. (1971), 'Mathematical Models of Dialogue', Theoria, 37, 1971, 130-155.
7. Hastings, A.C. (1963), A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation, Evanston, Illinois, Ph.D. Dissertation, 1963.
8. Lodder, A.R. (1999), Dialaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1999.
9. Lodder, A.R. (2002), 'Online negotiation and mediation: Is there room for argument support tools? - Some reflections on argumentation and eADR -', Law and the Information Society - BILETA 17th Annual Conference, http://www.bileta.ac.uk/02papers/lodder.html.
10. Lodder, A.R. & Huygen, P.E.M. (2001), 'eADR: A simple tool to structure the information exchange between parties in Online Alternative Dispute Resolution', in: B. Verheij et al. (eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2001:The Fourteenth Annual International Conference, IOS Press, p. 117-129.
11. Lodder, A.R. & J. Zeleznikow (2005), 'Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model.', Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 10:287-338, 2005.
12. Mochol, M. (2003), Proceedings of the ODR workshop 2003, Edinburgh, see http://odrworkshop.info.
13. Prakken, H. (2001), 'Relating Protocols for Dynamic Dispute with Logics for Defeasible Argumentation', Synthese, 127, 2001, 187-219.
14. Rule, C. (2002), Online Dispute Resolution for Business, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2002.
15. Vreeswijk, G.A.W and A.R. Lodder (2005) Vreeswijk, 'GearBi: towards an online arbitration environment based on the design principles simplicity, awareness, orientation, and timeliness', AI & Law, to appear
16. Wahab, M. (2004), "Online Dispute Resolution and Digital Inclusion: Challenging the Global Digital Divide", in: Conley Tyler, Melissa, Katsh, Ethan and Choi, Daewon (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. International Conflict Resolution Centre in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, www.odr.info.
17. Walton D (1998) The New Dialectic, Pennsylvania State University Press, PA.
18. Walton, D. and E. C. W. Krabbe (1995), Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1995.