Semantic frames as an anchor representation for sentiment analysis

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 104-109

  Ruppenhofer, Josef ^a   Rehbein, Ines ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HILDESHEIM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

'CURRENT; DATA SET; FRAMENET; RELATED WORKS; SEMANTIC FRAMES; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84907321289     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, and F. Sebastiani. 2008. SENTIWORDNET 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation LREC10, pages 2200-2204. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
2. Collin F. Baker, Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley Framenet Project. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1, pages 86-90. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Alexandra Balahur, Jesús M. Hermida, and Andrés Montoyo. 2011. Detecting implicit expressions of sentiment in text based on commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis (WASSA 2.011), pages 53-60, Portland, Oregon, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Farah Benamara, Sabatier Irit, Carmine Cesarano, Napoli Federico, and Diego Reforgiato. 2007. Sentiment analysis : Adjectives and adverbs are better than adjectives alone. In Proc of Int Conf on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 1-4.
5. Brett Drury, Gaël Dias, and Luís Torgo. 2011. A contextual classification strategy for polarity analysis of direct quotations from financial news. In Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing 2011, pages 434-440, Hissar, Bulgaria, September. RANLP 2011 Organising Committee.
6. Charles J. Fillmore, Russell Lee-Goldman, and Russell Rhodes, to appear. Sign-based Construction Grammar, chapter The FrameNet Constructicon. CSLI, Stanford, CA.
7. Charles J. Fillmore. 1989. Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In R. Dietrich and C.F. Graumann, editors, Language processing in social context, pages 17-38. North-Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam.
8. S.M. Kim and E. Hovy. 2006. Extracting opinions, opinion holders, and topics expressed in online news media text. In Proceedings of theWorkshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, pages 1-8. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Isa Maks and Piek Vossen. 2011. A verb lexicon model for deep sentiment analysis and opinion mining applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis (WASSA 2.011), pages 10-18, Portland, Oregon, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Karo Moilanen and Stephen Pulman. 2007. Sentiment composition. In Proceedings of RANLP 2007, Borovets, Bulgaria.
11. A. Neviarouskaya, H. Prendinger, and M. Ishizuka. 2009. Sentiful: Generating a reliable lexicon for sentiment analysis. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, 2009. ACII 2009. 3rd International Conference on, pages 1-6. Ieee.
12. J. Ruppenhofer, S. Somasundaran, and J. Wiebe. 2008. Finding the sources and targets of subjective expressions. In LREC, Marrakech, Morocco.
13. Roser Saurí. 2008. A Factuality Profiler for Eventualities in Text. Ph.d., Brandeis University.
14. Yohei Seki. 2007. Crosslingual opinion extraction from author and authority viewpoints at ntcir-6. In Proceedings of NTCIR-6 Workshop Meeting, Tokyo, Japan.
15. Mostafa Shaikh, Helmut Prendinger, and Ishizuka Mitsuru. 2007. Assessing sentiment of text by semantic dependency and contextual valence analysis. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pages 191- 202.
16. Veselin Stoyanov and Claire Cardie. 2008. Topic identification for fine-grained opinion analysis. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 1, COLING '08, pages 817-824, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Veselin Stoyanov and Claire Cardie. 2011. Automatically creating general-purpose opinion summaries from text. In Proceedings of RANLP 2011, pages 202- 209, Hissar, Bulgaria, September.
18. Cigdem Toprak, Niklas Jakob, and Iryna Gurevych. 2010. Sentence and expression level annotation of opinions in user-generated discourse. In Proceedings of ACL-10, the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. JanyceWiebe and Rada Mihalcea. 2006. Word sense and subjectivity. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-44, pages 1065-1072, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Janyce Wiebe, Theresa Wilson, and Claire Cardie. 2005. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation, 39(2/3):164-210.
21. Janyce Wiebe. 2000. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI- 2000), pages 735-740, Austin, Texas.
22. Michael Wiegand. 2010. Hybrid approaches to sentiment analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Saarland University, Saarbrücken.
23. Theresa Ann Wilson. 2008. Fine-grained Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis: Recognizing the Intensity, Polarity, and Attitudes of Private States. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh.