Money, sex, and religion - The supreme court's ACA sequel

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 371, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 862-866

  Annas, George J ^a   Ruger, Theodore W ^b   Ruger, Jennifer Prah ^c  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIRTH CONTROL; COURT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MEDICAL CARE; MONEY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

CIVIL RIGHTS; COMMERCE; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; PRIVATE SECTOR; RELIGION AND MEDICINE; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSAL COVERAGE; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 84907303707     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMhle1408081     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 132S.Ct. 2566 (2012).
2. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4505 (June 30).
3. Mariner WK, Glantz LH, Annas GJ. Reframing federalism - the Affordable Care Act (and broccoli) in the Supreme Court. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1154-8.
4. Recommendations. In: Committee on Preventive Services for Women, Institute of Medicine. Clinical prevention services for women: closing the gap. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011:102-10.
5. The court limits Americans' rights. New York Times. July 1, 2014:A16.
6. Religious liberty affirmed. Wall Street Journal. June 30, 2014:A12.
7. Annas GJ. Abortion politics and health insurance reform. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2589-91.
8. Birth control: medicines to help you. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration (http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ByAudience/ForWomen/ FreePublications/ucm313215.htm).
9. Hobby Lobby Stores v. Sebelius, 723 F.3d 1114 (CA 10 2013).
10. Mariner WK. Hobby Lobby - Part 2: do religions get their own facts? HealthLawProfBlog. July 2, 2014 (http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/healthlawprof- blog/2014/07/guest-blogger-professor-wendy-mariner-hobby-lobby-part-2-do- religions-get-their-own-facts.html).
11. U.S. Code, Title 42: The Public Health and Welfare, Sec.300gg-13, coverage of preventive health services.
12. 77 Fed. Reg. 8725-26.
13. Amicus Curiae Brief of Corporate and Criminal Law Professors in Support of Petitioners, 3-5 (Nos. 13-354 and 13-356).
14. Little Sisters of the Poor v. Sebelius, 134 S.Ct. 1022 (2014).
15. Wheaton College v. Burwell, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4706 (July 3).
16. United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 (1982).
17. Long H. Hobby Lobby does invest in birth control. CNN Money. July 2, 2014 (http://money.cnn.com/2014/07/01/investing/hobby-lobby-401k-contraception).
18. ACOG statement on the Supreme Court decision on Hobby Lobby v. Burwell. Washington, DC: American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, June 30, 2014 (http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2014/ACOG- Statement-on-the-Supreme-Court-Decision-on-Hobby-Lobby-v-Sebelius).
19. Ruger JP. Health and social justice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2009.
20. Cohen IG, Lynch HF, Curfman GD. When religious freedom clashes with access to care. N Engl J Med 2014;371:596-9.
21. Ruger JP. Fair enough? Inviting inequities in state health benefits. N Engl J Med 2012;366:681-3.