A combined bottom-up and top-down approach for assessment of climate change adaptation options

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 518, Issue PA, 2013, Pages 150-161

  Bhave, Ajay Gajanan ^a   Mishra, Ashok ^a   Raghuwanshi, Narendra Singh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Regional climate model; Stakeholder approach; Streamflow; WEAP

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; CLIMATE MODELS; INTEGRATED CONTROL; STREAM FLOW;

ADAPTATION REQUIREMENTS; CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION; MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS; REGIONAL CLIMATE MODELING; REGIONAL CLIMATE MODELS; STAKEHOLDER APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION; WEAP;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; ASSESSMENT METHOD; BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELING; FOREST COVER; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MAGNITUDE; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY MAKING; REGIONAL CLIMATE; RESOLUTION; STAKEHOLDER; STREAMFLOW; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TOP-DOWN CONTROL;

INDIA; KANGSABATI RIVER; WEST BENGAL;

EID: 84907249677     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.039     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements-FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome. 300, p. 6541.
2. Arnell N.W. Adapting to climate change: an evolving research programme. Clim. Change 2010, 100:107-111.
3. Bandyopadhyay A., Bhadra A., Swarnakar R., Raghuwanshi N., Singh R. Estimation of reference evapotranspiration using a user-friendly decision support system: DSS_ET. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2012, 154:19-29.
4. Bates, B.C., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Wu, S., Palutikof, J.P., 2008. Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
5. Bhave A.G., Mishra A., Groot A. Sub-basin scale characterization of climate change vulnerability, impacts and adaptation in an Indian River basin. Reg. Environ. Change 2013, 1-12. 10.1007/s10113-013-0416-8.
6. Bormann H., Ahlhorn F., Klenke T. Adaptation of water management to regional climate change in a coastal region-hydrological change vs. community perception and strategies. J. Hydrol. 2012, 454:64-75.
7. Burton I., Malone E., Huq S., Lim B., Spanger-Siegfried E. Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies Policies and Measures 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Central Ground Water Board, 2013. Master Plan for Artificial Recharge to Groundwater in India. Ministry of Water Resources, Govt of India. http://cgwb.gov.in/documents/MasterPlan-2013.pdf.
9. Coreau A., Pinay G., Thompson J.D., Cheptou P., Mermet L. The rise of research on futures in ecology: rebalancing scenarios and predictions. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1277-1286.
10. De Winnaar G., Jewitt G., Horan M. A GIS-based approach for identifying potential runoff harvesting sites in the Thukela River basin, South Africa. Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C 2007, 32:1058-1067.
11. Dessai S., Hulme M. Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities?. Clim. Policy 2004, 4:107-128.
12. Downing, T., Patwardhan, A., 2004. In: B. Lim, E. Spangler-Sigfried (Eds.), Assessing Vulnerability for Climate Adaptation in Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change, UNDP.
13. Füssel H. Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain. Sci. 2007, 2:265-275.
14. Gordon C., Cooper C., Senior C.A., Banks H., Gregory J.M., Johns T.C., et al. The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim. Dyn. 2000, 16:147-168.
15. Govt. of India, 2008. National Action Plan on Climate Change. http://pmindia.gov.in/climate_change_english.pdf.
16. Govt. of West Bengal, 2003. Performance Evaluation Study and System Analysis of Kangsabati Reservoir Project. vols. I and II.
17. Hajkowicz S., Collins K. A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour. Manage 2007, 21:1553-1566.
18. Harma K.J., Johnson M.S., Cohen S.J. Future water supply and demand in the Okanagan Basin, British Columbia: a scenario-based analysis of multiple, interacting stressors. Water Resour. Manage 2012, 26:667-689.
19. Im E., Jung I., Chang H., Bae D., Kwon W. Hydroclimatological response to dynamically downscaled climate change simulations for Korean basins. Clim. Change 2010, 100:485-508.
20. Joyce B.A., Mehta V.K., Purkey D.R., Dale L.L., Hanemann M. Modifying agricultural water management to adapt to climate change in California's central valley. Clim. Change 2011, 109:299-316.
21. Krishnaswamy J., Bonell M., Venkatesh B., Purandara B.K., Rakesh K.N., Lele S., Kiran M.C., Reddy V., Badiger S. The groundwater recharge response and hydrologic services of tropical humid forest ecosystems to use and reforestation: Support for the “infiltration-evapotranspiration trade-off hypothesis“. J. Hydrol 2013, 498:191-209.
22. Lempert R.J., Groves D.G., Popper S.W., Bankes S.C. A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manage. Sci. 2006, 52:514-528.
23. Mathison C., Wiltshire A., Dimri A., Falloon P., Jacob D., Kumar P., et al. Regional projections of North Indian climate for adaptation studies. Sci. Total Environ 2012, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.066.
24. Mehta V.K., Haden V.R., Joyce B.A., Purkey D.R., Jackson L.E. Irrigation demand and supply, given projections of climate and land-use change, in Yolo County, California. Agric. Water Manage. 2013, 117:70-82.
25. Miller N.L., Bashford K.E., Strem E. Potential impacts of climate change on california hydrology1. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2003, 39:771-784.
26. Mittal N., Mishra A., Singh R. Combining climatological and participatory approaches for assessing changes in extreme climatic indices at regional scale. Clim. Change 2013, 119:603-615.
27. Moriasi D., Arnold J., Van Liew M., Bingner R., Harmel R., Veith T. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50:885-900.
28. Purkey D., Joyce B., Vicuna S., Hanemann M., Dale L., Yates D., et al. Robust analysis of future climate change impacts on water for agriculture and other sectors: a case study in the Sacramento Valley. Clim. Change 2008, 87:109-122.
29. Ramakrishnan D., Bandyopadhyay A., Kusuma K. SCS-CN and GIS-based approach for identifying potential water harvesting sites in the Kali Watershed, Mahi River Basin. India. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2009, 118:355-368.
30. Roeckner E. The Atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM5: Part 1: Model Description 2003, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie.
31. Shih, P., Nguyen, D., Hirano, S., Redmiles, D., 2009. GroupMind: supporting idea generation through a collaborative mind-mapping tool, In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, ACM, New York.
32. Smit, B., Pilifosova, O., 2001. Adaptation to Climate Change in the Context of Sustainable Development and Equity. Third Assessment Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
33. United Nations Development Programme, 2004. West Bengal Human Development Report. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/national/asiathepacific/india/India_West%20Bengal_2004_en.pdf.
34. van't Klooster S.A., van Asselt M. Practising the scenario-axes technique. Futures 2006, 38:15-30.
35. Vicuña S., Garreaud R.D., McPhee J. Climate change impacts on the hydrology of a snowmelt driven basin in semiarid Chile. Clim. Change 2011, 105:469-488.
36. West Bengal State Marketing Board, 2012. Cropping intensity of districts. (accessed 04.03.13). http://wbagrimarketingboard.gov.in/Area/Grosscropped.html.
37. Wilby R.L., Dessai S. Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 2010, 65:180-185.
38. Yates D., Sieber J., Purkey D., Huber Lee A., Galbraith H. WEAP21: a demand, priority, and preference driven water planning model: part 2, aiding freshwater ecosystem service evaluation. Water Int. 2005, 30:487-500.
39. Yates D., Sieber J., Purkey D., Huber-Lee A. WEAP21-a demand-, priority-, and preference-driven water planning model: Part 1: model characteristics. Water Int. 2005, 30:487-500.