Using Social Media in Research: New Ethics for a New Meme?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 60-61

  Swirsky, Eric S ^a   Hoop, Jinger G ^a   Labott, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDIA;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84907242330     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2014.948302     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Google. 2014. Google terms of service: Your content in our services. Available at: http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/terms (accessed June 23, 2014).
2. Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 922(x)(2) (1968). Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-82/pdf/STATUTE-82-Pg1213-2.pdf
3. Suler, J. 2004. The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7(3): 321–326.
4. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 2009. Protection of Human Subjects, 45 C.F.R. § 46.101(b)(2) (2009).
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Human Research Protections. 2013. Considerations and recommendations concerning Internet research and human subjects research regulations, with revisions. Final document, approved at Secretary's Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp/mtgings/2013%20March%20Mtg/internet_research.pdf (accessed June 23, 2014).
6. Viswanath, K., R. McCloud, S. Minsky, 2013. Internet use, browsing, and the urban poor: implications for cancer control. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs 47:199–205.