The ‘mental models’ methodology for developing communications: Adaptations for informing public risk management decisions about emerging technologies

Effective Risk Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 165-189

  Fleishman Mayer, Lauren A ^a   De Bruin, Wändi Bruine ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907214887     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203109861     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Ansolabehere, S., Public attitudes toward American’s energy options: report of the 2007 MIT Energy Survey, Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, 2007.
2. Ashworth, P., Boughen, N., Mayhew, M. and F. Millar, ‘An integrated roadmap of communication activities around carbon capture and storage in Australia and beyond’, Energy Procedia 1, 2009, pp. 4749–4756.
3. Baker, G.C., Newton, D.E. and P.R. Bergstresser, ‘Increased readability improves the comprehension of written information for patients with skin disease’, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 19, 1988, pp. 1135–1141.
4. Bostrom, A., Anselin, L. and J. Farris, ‘Visualizing seismic risk and uncertainty’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1128, 2008, pp. 29–40.
5. Bostrom, A., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B. and D. Read, ‘What do people know about global climate change? 1. mental models’, Risk Analysis 14, 1994, pp. 959–970.
6. Bruine de Bruin, W., ‘Framing effects in surveys: how respondents make sense of the questions we ask,’ in Keren, G., ed., Perspectives on Framing, London: Taylor and Francis, 2011, pp. 303–324.
7. Bruine de Bruin, W., Downs, J.S. and B. Fischhoff, ‘Adolescents’ thinking about the risks and benefi ts of sexual behavior’ in Lovett, M.C. and P. Shah, eds., Thinking with data, Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum, 2007a, pp. 421–439.
8. Bruine de Bruin, W. and B. Fischhoff, ‘The effect of question format on measured HIV/ AIDS knowledge: Detention center teens, high school students, and adults’, AIDS education and prevention 12, 2000, pp. 187–198.
9. Bruine de Bruin, W., Fischhoff, B. Brilliant, L. and D. Caruso, ‘Expert judgments of pandemic inflfluenza risks’, Global Public Health 1, 2006, pp. 179–194.
10. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A.M. and B. Fischhoff, ‘Individual differences in adult decision-making competence’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92, 2007b, p. 938.
11. Chin, A., and W. Bruine de Bruin, ‘The effect of the readability of expectations question on response patterns (Under Review)’, Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Social and Decision Sciences, 2012.
12. De Best-Waldhober, M., Daamen, D. and A. Faaij, ‘Informed and uninformed public opinions of CO2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands’, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 3, 2009, pp. 322–332.
13. DeKay, M.L., Florig, H.K. and P.S. Fischbeck, ‘The use of public risk ranking in regulatory development,’ in Fischbeck, P.S. and R.S. Farrow, eds., Improving Regulation: Cases in Environment, Health and Safety, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2001, pp. 208–230.
14. Downs, J.S., ‘Evaluation’ in Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N.T. and J.S. Downs, eds., Communicating risks and benefifits: an evidence-based user’s guide: Food and Drug Administration, 2011.
15. Downs, J.S., Bruine de Bruin, W. and B. Fischhoff, ‘Parents’ vaccination comprehension and decisions’, Vaccine 26, 2008, pp. 1595–1607.
16. Downs, J.S., Murray, P.J., Bruine de Bruin, W., Penrose, J., Palmgren, C. and B. Fischhoff, ‘Interactive video behavioral intervention to reduce adolescent females’ STD risk: a randomized controlled trial’, Social Science & Medicine 59, 2004, pp. 1561–1572.
17. Edwards, W., ‘The theory of decision-making’, Psychological Bulletin 51, 1954, pp. 380–417.
18. Kaczmirek, L. and Lenzner, A. Psycholinguistic Determinants of Question Diffi culty: A Web Experiment. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Social Science Methodology (RC33) [cd-rom], University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Italy. 2008. Also available at: http://www.suristat.eu/document/ documentArticle/Faass_et_al.pdf
19. Farhar, B.C. and J. Buhrmann, Public Response to Residential Grid-Tied PV Systems in Colorado: A Qualitative Market Assessment, Golden, CO: NREL, July, 1998.
20. Fischhoff, B., ‘Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of Process 1’, Risk Analysis 15, 1995, pp. 137–145.
21. Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N.T. and J.S. Downs, Communicating risks and benefifits: an evidencebased user’s guide: Food and Drug Administration, 2011.
22. Fischhoff, B., Bruine de Bruin, W., Güvenç, U., Brilliant, L. and D. Caruso, ‘Analyzing disaster risks and plans: An Avian Flu example’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 33, 2006, pp. 131–149.
23. Fishkin, J., ‘Strategies of Public Consultation’, Integrated Assessment 6, 2006, pp. 57–72.
24. Fleishman, L.A., Bruine de Bruin, W. and M.G. Morgan, ‘Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies’, Risk Analysis 30, 2010, pp. 1399–1410.
25. Fleishman, L.A., Bruine de Bruin, W. and M.G. Morgan ‘The value of CCS public opinion research: A letter in response to Malone, Dooley and Bradbury (2010) “Moving from misinformation derived from public attitude surveys on carbon dioxide capture and storage towards realistic stakeholder involvement”’, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 7, 2011, pp. 265–266.
26. Fleishman, L.A., Bruine de Bruin, W. and M.G. Morgan ‘Informed public choices for low-carbon electricity portfolios using a computer decision tool’, Under review.
27. Flesch, R., ‘A new readability yardstick.’, Journal of Applied Psychology 32, 1948, pp. 221–233.
28. Florig, K.H., Morgan, M.G., Morgan, K.M., Jenni, K.E., Fischhoff, B., Fischbeck, P.S. and M.L. DeKay, ‘A deliberative method for ranking risks (I): Overview and test bed development’, Risk Analysis 21, 2001, pp. 913–921.
29. Fowler, F.J., Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation, Thosand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
30. Ha-Duong, M., Nada, A. and A.S. Campos, ‘A survey on the public perception of CCS in France’, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 3, 2009, pp. 633–640.
31. Howard, R.A. and J.E. Matheson, Infl uence diagrams: Pittsburgh, PA: Stanford Research Institute, 1981.
32. Hsee, C.K., ‘The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67, 1996, pp. 247–257.
33. Huijts, N., Midden, C. and A.L. Meijnders, ‘Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage’, Energy Policy 35, 2007, pp. 2780–2789.
34. Ibrekk, H. and M.G. Morgan, ‘Graphical communication of uncertain quantities to nontechnical people’, Risk Analysis 7, 1987, pp. 519–529.
35. Jacobson, D., Parker, A.M., Spetzler, C., Bruine de Bruin, W., Hollenbeck, K., Heckerman, D., and B. Fischhoff, ‘Improved learning in US history and decision competence with decision-focused curriculum’, PLOS ONE 7, 2012, p. e45775.
36. Jenni, K.E., Attributes for risk evaluation, Engineering and public policy, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 1997.
37. Just, M.A. and P.A. Carpenter, ‘A theory of reading: From eye fi xations to comprehension’, Psychological Review 87, 1980, pp. 329–354.
38. Keren, G., Perspectives on framing, London: Taylor and Francis, 2010.
39. Keren, G. and W. Bruine de Bruin, ‘On the assessment of decision quality: Considerations regarding utility, confl ict and accountability’, Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision-making, 2003, p. 347.
40. Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P., Rogers, R.L. and B.S. Chissom, Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel, Memphis, TN: Naval Technical Training, US. Naval Air Station Research Branch Report 8–75, 1975.
41. Klima, K., Bruine de Bruin, W., Morgan, M.G. and I. Grossman, ‘Public perceptions of hurricane modififi cation’, Risk Analysis, 2011.
42. Krishnamurti, T., Eggers, S. and B. Fischhoff, ‘The impact of over-the-counter availability of Plan B‚ on teens’ contraceptive decision-making’, Social Science & Medicine 67, 2008, pp. 618–627.
43. Krishnamurti, T., Schwartz, D., Davis, A., Fischhoff, B., Bruine de Bruin, W., Lave, L. and J. Wang, ‘Preparing for smart grid technologies: A behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters’, Energy Policy, 2011.
44. Larkin, J.H. and H.A. Simon, ‘Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words’, Cognitive Science 11, 1987, pp. 65–100.
45. Lipkus, I.M., ‘Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: Suggested best practices and future recommendations’, Medical Decision-making 27, 2007, pp. 696–713.
46. Lipkus, I.M. and J.G. Hollands, ‘The visual communication of risk’, JNCI Monographs 1999, pp. 149–163.
47. Maharik, M. and B. Fischhoff, ‘The risks of using nuclear energy sources in space: some lay activists’ perceptions’, Risk Analysis 12, 1992, pp. 383–391.
48. Malone, E.L., Dooley, J.J. and J.A. Bradbury, ‘Moving from misinformation derived from public attitude surveys on carbon dioxide capture and storage towards realistic stakeholder involvement’, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 2010, pp. 419–425.
49. Morgan, K.M., DeKay, M.L., Fischbeck, P.S., Morgan, M.G., B. Fischhoff, and H.K. Florig, ‘A deliberative method for ranking risks (II): Evaluation of validity and agreement among risk managers’, Risk Analysis 21, 2001, pp. 923–937.
50. Morgan, M.G., Florig, H.K., DeKay, M.L. and P.S. Fischbeck, ‘Categorizing risks for risk ranking’, Risk Analysis 20, 2000, pp. 49–58.
51. Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A. and C. J. Atman, Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
52. Moutenet, J., Bédard, K. and M.l Malo, ‘Public awareness and opinion on CCS in the province of Québec, Canada’, Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 2, 2012, pp. 126–135.
53. National Energy Technology Laboratory, ‘What is carbon sequestration (or carbon capture and storage)?’ 2011. Available at: http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/FAQs/carbonseq.html
54. National Work Group on Literacy and Health, ‘Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills: report of the National Work Group on Literacy and Health’, Journal of Family Practice 46, 1998, pp. 168–174.
55. Palmgren, C.R., Morgan, M.G., Bruine de Bruin, W. and D.W. Keith, ‘Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide’, Environmental Science & Technology 38, Dec 15, 2004, pp. 6441–6450.
56. Plate, R.R., Monroe, M.C. and A. Oxarart, ‘Public Perceptions of Using Woody Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source’, Journal of Extension 48, 2010, pp. 1–15.
57. Presser, S. and J. Blair, ‘Survey Pretesting: Do Different Methods Produce Different Results?’ in Marsden, Peter, ed., Sociological Methodology, San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass, 1994, pp. 73–104.
58. Raiffa, H., Decision Analysis, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
59. Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B. and T. Smuts, ‘What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople’, Risk Analysis 14, 1994, pp. 971–982.
60. Reiner, D., Curry, T., Figueiredo, M., Herzog, H., Ansolabehere, S., Itaoka, K., Johnsson, F. and M. Odenberger, ‘American exceptionalism? similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warming’, Environmental Science & Technology 40, 2006, pp. 2093–2098.
61. Reynolds, T.W., Bostrom, A., Read D., and M.G. Morgan, ‘Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople’, Risk Analysis 30, 2010, pp. 1520–1538.
62. Schirillo, J.A. and E.R. Stone, ‘The greater ability of graphical versus numerical displays to increase risk avoidance involves a common mechanism’, Risk Analysis 25, 2005, pp. 555–566.
63. Shachter, R.D., ‘Probabilistic inference and infl uence diagrams’, Operations Research 36, 1988, pp. 589–604.
64. Sharp, J., Public Attitudes towards Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide in Canada, School of Resource and Environmental Management, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Frasier University, 2005.
65. Siegrist, M. and G. Cvetkovich, ‘Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge’, Risk Analysis 20, 2000, pp. 713–720.
66. Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H. and T.C. Earle, ‘Perception of risk: The infl uence of general trust, and general confifidence’, Journal of Risk Research 8, 2005, pp. 145–156.
67. Skurnik, I., Yoon, C. and N. Schwarz, ‘“Myths & Facts” about the fl u: Health education campaigns can reduce vaccination intentions’, Under Review.
68. Stanovich, K.E. and R.F. West, ‘On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability’, Journal of personality and social psychology 94, 2008, p. 672.
69. Weiss, B.D. and C. Coyne, ‘Communicating with patients who cannot read’, New England Journal of Medicine 337, 1997, pp. 272–274.
70. Willis, H.H., DeKay, M.L., Morgan, M.G., Florig, H.K. and P.S. Fischbeck, ‘Ecological risk ranking: Development and evaluation of a method for improving public participation in environmental decision-making’, Risk Analysis 24, 2004, pp. 363–378.
71. Xu, J., Florig, H.K. and M.L. DeKay, ‘Evaluating an analytic-deliberative risk-ranking process in a Chinese context’, Journal of Risk Research 14, 2011, pp. 899–918.
72. Zikmund-Fisher, B.J., Fagerlin, A. and P.A. Ubel, ‘Is 28% good or bad? Evaluability and preference reversals in health care decisions’, Medical Decision-making 24, 2004, pp. 142–148.