Examination of the test-retest reliability of a computerized neurocognitive test battery

American Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2000-2005

  Nakayama, Yusuke ^a   Covassin, Tracey ^a   Schatz, Philip ^b   Nogle, Sally ^a   Kovan, Jeff ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAINT JOSEPH S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

concussion; neurocognitive testing; test retest reliability

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ATHLETIC INJURIES; BRAIN CONCUSSION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ATHLETIC INJURIES; BRAIN CONCUSSION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907212742     PISSN: 03635465     EISSN: 15523365     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0363546514535901     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Psychological Testing. 6 th ed.New York: Macmillan; 1998. Anastasi A, ed. New York: Macmillan ; 1998 :
2. Barr WB. Neuropsychological testing for assessment of treatment effects: methodologic issues. CNS Spectr. 2002 ; 7 (4). 300 304-302 306
3. Baumgartner T, Chung H. Confidence limits for intraclass reliability coefficients. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2001 ; 5 (3). 179-188
4. Bernard LC, Fowler W. Assessing the validity of memory complaints: performance of brain-damaged and normal individuals on Rey's task to detect malingering. J Clin Psychol. 1990 ; 46 (4). 432-436
5. Broglio S, Ferrara M, Macciocchi S, Baumgartner T, Elliott R. Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs. J Athl Train. 2007 ; 42 (4). 509-514
6. Broglio S, Macciocchi S, Ferrara M. Sensitivity of the concussion assessment battery. Neurosurgery. 2007 ; 60 (6). 1050-1058
7. Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Lüders H, Sedlak J, Awad IA. Individual change after epilepsy surgery: practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology. 1993 ; 7: 41-52
8. Chinn S. Repeatability and method comparison. Thorax. 1991 ; 46: 454-456
9. Cole WR, Arrieux JP, Schwab K, Ivins BJ, Qashu FM, Lewis SC. Test-retest reliability of four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in an active duty military population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 ; 28 (7). 732-742
10. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Comparing patients' predicted test scores from a regression equation with their obtained scores: a significance test and point estimate of abnormality with accompanying confidence limits. Neuropsychology. 2006 ; 20 (3). 259-271
11. Echemendia RJ, Herring S, Bailes J. Who should conduct and interpret the neuropsychological assessment in sports-related concussion?. Br J Sports Med. 2009 ; 43: i32 -i35
12. Elbin R, Schatz P, Covassin T. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of impact in high school athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2011 ; 39 (11). 2319-2324
13. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 ; 43 (7). 1334-1359
14. Goldberg JO, Miller HR. Performance of psychiatric inpatients and intellectually deficient individuals on a task that assesses the validity of memory complaints. J Clin Psychol. 1986 ; 42 (5). 792-795
15. Guskiewicz KM, Bruce SL, Cantu R, et al. National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: management of sports-related concussion. J Athl Train. 2004 ; 39 (3). 280-297
16. Iverson GL, Sawyer DC, McCracken LM, Kozora E. Assessing depression in systemic lupus erythematosus: determining reliable change. Lupus. 2001 ; 10 (4). 266-271
17. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 ; 59 (1). 12-19
18. Langlois J, Rutland-Brown W, Wald M. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006 ; 21 (5). 375-378
19. Maerlender A, Flashman L, Kessler A, et al. Discriminant construct validity of ImPACT™: a companion study. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 ; 27 (2). 290-299
20. Maerlender A, Flashman L, Kessler A, et al. Examination of the construct validity of ImPACT computerized test, traditional, and experimental neuropsychological measures. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 ; 24 (8). 1309-1325
21. Mayers LB, Redick TS. Clinical utility of ImPACT assessment for postconcussion return-to-play counseling: psychometric issues. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012 ; 34 (3). 235-242
22. McCrea M, Barr WB, Guskiewicz K, et al. Standard regression-based methods for measuring recovery after sport-related concussion. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005 ; 11 (1). 58-69
23. McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Zurich, November 2012. ; 2013 ; 2013. 554.
24. Randolph C, McCrea M, Barr W. Is neuropsychological testing useful in the management of sport-related concussion?. J Athl Train. 2005 ; 40 (3). 139-152
25. Resch J, Driscoll A, McCaffrey N, et al. ImPact test-retest reliability: reliably unreliable?. J Athl Train. 2013 ; 48 (4). 506-511
26. Rey A. L'examen psychologie dans las cas d'encephalopathie traumatique. Arch Psychol. 1941 ; 23 (112). 286-340
27. Schatz P. Long-term test-retest reliability of baseline cognitive assessments using ImPACT. Am J Sports Med. 2010 ; 38 (1). 47-53
28. Schatz P, Ferris CS. One-month test-retest reliability of the ImPACT test battery. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 ; 28 (5). 499-504
29. Schatz P, Moser RS, Solomon GS, Ott SD, Karpf R. Prevalence of invalid computerized baseline neurocognitive test results in high school and collegiate athletes. J Athl Train. 2012 ; 47 (3). 289-296
30. Schatz P, Pardini J, Lovell M, Collins M, Podell K. Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT test battery for concussion in athletes. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 ; 21: 91-99
31. Schatz P, Sandel N. Sensitivity and specificity of the online version of ImPACT in high school and collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2013 ; 41 (2). 321-326
32. Schatz P, Zillmer EA. Computer-based assessment of sports-related concussion. Appl Neuropsychol. 2003 ; 10 (1). 42-47
33. Schatz S, Kontos A, Elbin R. Clinical utility of ImPACT assessment for postconcussion return-to-play counseling: psychometric issues. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012 ; 34 (4). 428-434
34. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005 ; 19 (1). 231-240