A Mixed Methods Approach to Network Data Collection

Field Methods

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 252-268

  Rice, Eric ^a   Holloway, Ian W ^b   Barman Adhikari, Anamika ^c   Fuentes, Dahlia ^a   Brown, C Hendricks ^d   Palinkas, Lawrence A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Neuromuscular Program   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

data collection; mixed methods; online survey; qualitative interviews

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907208586     PISSN: 1525822X     EISSN: 15523969     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X13518168     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bahrick H. P.,Bahrick P.,Wittlinger R.Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1975;104:54
2. Bernard H. R.,Killworth P. D.,Kronfeld D.,Sailor L.The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data.Annua1 Review of Anthropology. 1984;13:495-517
3. Bernardi L.A mixed-methods social networks study design for research on transnational families.Journal of Marriage and Family. 2011;73:788-803
4. Bidart C.,Charbonneau J.How to generate personal networks: Issues and tools for a sociological perspective.Field Methods. 2011;23:266-86
5. Borgatti S. P.NetDraw: Graph visualization software. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies; 2002
6. Borgatti S. P.,Everett M. G.,Freeman L. C.Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. 2002;
7. Brewer D. D.Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks.Social Networks. 2000;22:29-44
8. Brewer D. D.,Garrett S. B.,Rinaldi G.Free-listed items are effective cues for eliciting additional items in semantic domains.Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2002;16:343-58
9. Brown C. H.,Kellam S. G.,Kaupert S.,Muthén B. O.,Chamberlain P., et al.Partnerships for the design, conduct, and analysis of effectiveness and implementation research: Experiences of the Prevention Science and Methodology Group.Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2012;39:301-16
10. Campbell-Barrett A.,Karen E.Name generators in surveys of personal networks* 1.Social Networks. 1991;13:203-21
11. Chamberlain P.,Brown C. H.,Saldana L.,Reid J.,Wang W., et al.Engaging and recruiting counties in an experiment on implementing evidence-based practice in California.Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2008;35:250-60
12. Coviello N. E.Integrating qualitative and quantitative techniques in network analysis.Qualitative Market Research. 2005;8:39-60
13. Dempster A. P.,Laird N. M.,Rubin D. B.Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1977;39:1-38
14. Denzin N. K.The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978
15. Edwards G.Mixed-method approaches to social network analysis. Manchester, UK: National Centre for Research Methods; 2010
16. Freeman L. C.The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, Canada: Empirical Press; 2004
17. Friedkin N. E.An expected value model of social power: Predictions for selected exchange networks.Social Networks. 1992;14:213-29
18. Golinelli D.,Ryan G.,Green H. D.,Kennedy D. P.,Tucker J. S., et al.Sampling to reduce respondent burden in personal network studies and its effect on estimates of structural measures.Field Methods. 2010;22:217-30
19. Hammer M.Explorations into the meaning of social network interview data* 1.Social Networks. 1984;6:341-71
20. Kogovšek T.Reliability and validity of measuring social support networks by web and telephone.Metodoloski Zvezki. 2006;3:239-52
21. Kossinets G.Effects of missing data in social networks.Social Networks. 2006;28:247-68
22. Laumann E.,Marsden P.,Prensky D.The boundary specification problem in network analysis.Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction. 1983;61:18-34
23. Marin A.Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data.Social Networks. 2004;26:289-307
24. Marin A.,Hampton K. N.Simplifying the personal network name generator alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators.Field Methods. 2007;19:163-93
25. Marsden P. V.Recent developments in network measurement.Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. 2005;8:30
26. Matzat U.,Snijders C.Does the online collection of ego-centered network data reduce data quality? An experimental comparison.Social Networks. 2010;32:105-11
27. McCarty C.,Killworth P. D.,Rennell J.Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures.Social Networks. 2007;29:300-15
28. Palinkas L. A.,Aarons G. A.,Horwitz S.,Chamberlain P.,Hurlburt M., et al.Mixed method designs in implementation research.Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2011;38:44-53
29. Robins G.,Pattison P.,Woolcock J.Missing data in networks: Exponential random graph (p*) models for networks with non-respondents.Social Networks. 2004;26:257-83
30. Rumsey D. J.Columbus: Ohio State University; 1993
31. Stork D.,Richards W. D.Nonrespondents in communication network studies.Group & Organization Management. 1992;17:193-209
32. Sudman S.Experiments in measuring neighbor and relative social networks.Social Networks. 1988;10:93-108
33. Wasserman S.,Faust K.Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge; 1994