Defining variables of access to UK Biobank: The public interest and the public good

Law, Innovation and Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 113-139

  Capps, Benjamin ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907199371     PISSN: 17579961     EISSN: 1757997X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5235/17579961.5.1.113     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Ronald Dworkin, ‘Judicial Discretion’ (1963) 60 Journal of Philosophy 624, 635.
2. David Winickoff, ‘Partnership in UK Biobank: A Third Way for Genomic Property’ (2007) 35(3) Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 440, 446.
3. Ian Brown, et al, Database State: A Report Commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust Ltd to Map the Main Central UK Government Databases (Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust Ltd, 2009) 40.
4. Ellen Nakashima, ‘From DNA of Family, a Tool to Make Arrests’, Washington Post (21 April 2008), A01.
5. Ricky Ansella and Birgitta Rasmusson, ‘A Swedish Perspective’ (2008) 3 Biosocieties 88.
6. Christian Schall, ‘Public Interest Litigation Concerning Environmental Matters before Human Rights Courts: A Promising Future Concept?’ (2008) 20 Journal of Environmental Law 417.
7. See Deryck Beyleveld and Roger Brownsword, Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw (Oxford University Press, 2001).
8. See Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Bert Gordijn and Martien Pijnenburg, ‘Solidarity and Justice as Guiding Principles on Genomic Research’ (2007) 21 Bioethics 342.
9. Thomas Pogge, ‘Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Program’ in C Barry and T Pogge (eds), Global Institutions and Responsibilities: Achieving Global Justice (Blackwell, 2005) 190.
10. Matthew Rimmer, ‘The Race to Patent the SARS Virus: The TRIPS Agreement and Access to Essential Medicines’ (2004) 5 Melbourne Journal of International Law 335.
11. Helen M Wallace, ‘Big Tobacco and the Human Genome: Driving the Scientific Bandwagon?’ (2009) 5 Genomics, Society and Policy 80.