Reply to Maley: Yes, appropriate modeling of fatality counts confirms female hurricanes are deadlier

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 37, 2014, Pages E3853-

  Jung, Kiju ^a   Shavitt, Sharon ^a   Viswanathan, Madhu ^a   Hilbe, Joseph M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISASTER; FEMALE; HUMAN; HURRICANE; MALE; METEOROLOGY; NOMENCLATURE;

CYCLONIC STORMS; DISASTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METEOROLOGY; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84907198405     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414111111     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Jung K, Shavitt S, Viswanathan M, Hilbe JM (2014) Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(24):8782-8787.
2. Maley S (2014) Statistics show no evidence of gender bias in the public's hurricane preparedness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E3834.
3. Hilbe JM (2011) Negative Binomial Regression (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), 2nd Ed.
4. Czajkowski J, Simmons K, Sutter D (2011) An analysis of coastal and inland fatalities in landfalling US hurricanes. Nat Hazards 59(3): 1513-1531.
5. Rappaport EN (2000) Loss of life in the United States associated with recent Atlantic tropical cyclones. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81(9): 2065-2073.