Predictors of early and late stroke following cardiac surgery

CMAJ

Volumn 186, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 905-911

  Whitlock, Richard ^a   Healey, Jeff S ^a   Connolly, Stuart J ^a   Wang, Julie ^c   Danter, Matthew R ^d   Tu, Jack V ^b,c   Novick, Richard ^e   Fremes, Stephen ^b   Teoh, Kevin ^a   Khera, Vikas ^a   Yusuf, Salim ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; CANADA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DEATH; DIALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART SURGERY; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RURAL AREA; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL PATIENT; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; ADOLESCENT; AGED; EVALUATION STUDY; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK FACTORS; STROKE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907168757     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.131214     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Daniel K, Wolfe CD, Busch MA, et al. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke 2009;40:e431-40.
2. Demaerschalk BM, Hwang HM, Leung G. US cost burden of ischemic stroke: a systematic literature review. Am J Manag Care 2010; 16:525-33.
3. Ringborg A, Yin DD, Martinell M, et al. The impact of acute myocardial infarction and stroke on health care costs in patients with type 2 diabetes in sweden. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2009; 16:576-82.
4. Creswell LL, Schuessler RB, Rosenbloom M, et al. Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:539-49.
5. Gardner TJ, Horneffer PJ, Manolio TA, et al. Stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting: a ten-year study. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;40:574-81.
6. Hogue CW Jr, Murphy SF, Schechtman KB, et al. Risk factors for early or delayed stroke after cardiac surgery. Circulation 1999;100:642-7.
7. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter study of perioperative ischemia research group and the ischemia research and education foundation investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1857-63.
8. Stamou SC, Hill PC, Dangas G, et al. Stroke after coronary artery bypass: incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome. Stroke 2001;32:1508-13.
9. Tarakji KG, Sabik JF III, Bhudia SK, et al. Temporal onset, risk factors, and outcomes associated with stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA 2011;305:381-90.
10. Goldstein LB, Adams R, Alberts MJ, et al. Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke 2006; 37:1583-633.
11. Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Feigin VL, et al. Blood pressure and stroke: an overview of published reviews. Stroke 2004;35:1024.
12. Whitlock RP, Healey JS, Connolly SJ. Left atrial appendage occlusion does not eliminate the need for warfarin. Circulation 2009;120:1927-32; discussion 1932.
13. Guru V, Fremes SE, Austin PC, et al. Gender differences in outcomes after hospital discharge from coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2006;113:507-16.
14. Hassan A, Newman A, Ko DT, et al. Increasing rates of angioplasty versus bypass surgery in Canada, 1994-2005. Am Heart J 2010; 160:958-65.
15. Silaruks S, Thinkhamrop B, Tantikosum W, et al. A prognostic model for predicting the disappearance of left atrial thrombi among candidates for percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:886-91.
16. Lee DS, Stitt A, Wang X, et al. Administrative hospitalization database validation of cardiac procedure codes. Med Care 2013; 51:e22-6.
17. Salazar JDWR, Grega MA, Borowicz LM, et al. Stroke after cardiac surgery: short- and long-term outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1195-201.
18. Hogue CW Jr, Barzilai B, Pieper KS, et al. Sex differences in neurological outcomes and mortality after cardiac surgery: a society of thoracic surgery national database report. Circulation 2001; 103:2133-7.
19. Gage BF, van Walraven C, Pearce L, et al. Selecting patients with atrial fibrillation for anticoagulation: stroke risk stratification in patients taking aspirin. Circulation 2004;110:2287-92.
20. Puskas JD, Winston AD, Wright CE, et al. Stroke after coronary artery operation: incidence, correlates, outcome, and cost. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1053-6.
21. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Borger MA, et al. Stroke after cardiac surgery: a risk factor analysis of 16,184 consecutive adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:472-8.
22. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, et al. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 2001;285: 2864-70.
23. Welles CC, Whooley M, Na B, et al. The CHADS2 score predicts stroke in the absence of atrial fibrillaion among subjects with coronary heart disease: data from the Heart and Soul Study. Am Heart J 2011;162:555-61.
24. Tu K, Campbell N, Chen ZL, et al. Accuracy of administrative databases in identifying patients with hypertension. Open Med 2007; 1:e18-26.
25. Population 5 years and over by mobility status, by province and territory (New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario) [table]. 2006 Census. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Available: www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo56b-eng.htm (modified 2007 Dec. 11; accessed 2014 July 16).