The common in-group identity model enhances communication about recycled water

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue , 2014, Pages 296-305

  Schultz, Tracy ^a   Fielding, Kelly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Common in group identity model; Public perceptions; Recycled water; Recycled water communication; Social identity; Superordinate identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907165001     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: 15229610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abrams D., Wetherell M., Cochrane S., Hogg M.A., Turner J.C. Knowing what to think by knowing who you are-Self categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology 1990, 29:97-119.
2. Apostolidis N., Hertle C., Young R. Water recycling in Australia. Water (Australia) 2011, 3:869-881. 10.3390/w3030869.
3. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
4. Bizman A., Yinon Y. Perceived threat and Israeli Jews' evaluations of Russian immigrants: The moderating role of Jewish and Israeli identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 2001, 25:691-704.
5. Blok A., Jensen M., Kaltoft P. Social identities and risk: Expert and lay imaginations on pesticide use. Public Understanding of Science 2008, 17:189-209.
6. Bridgeman J. Public perception towards water recycling in California. Water and Environment Journal 2004, 18(3):150-154.
7. Brown R. Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology 2000, 30:745-778.
8. Callaghan P., Moloney G., Blair D. Contagion in the representational field of water recycling: Informing new environment practice through social representation theory. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 2012, 22(1):20-37. 10.1002/casp.1101.
9. Chen S., Chaiken S. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. Dual process theories in social psychology 1999, 73-96. Guilford, New York. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
10. Crano W.D., Prislin R. Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:345-374. 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034.
11. Dolnicar S., Hurlimann A., Grun B. What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water?. Water Research 2011, 45(2):933-943.
12. Dolnicar S., Hurlimann A., Nghiem L.D. The effect of information on public acceptance: The case of water from alternative sources. Journal of Environmental Management 2010, 91:1288-1293. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.003.
13. Dolnicar S., Saunders C. Recycled water for consumer markets: A marketing research review and agenda 2005, Paper presented at the Integrated Concepts in Water Recycling 2005, Conference Summary from the Organising Committee, Wollongong.
14. Dolnicar S., Schäfer A. Desalinated versus recycled water: Public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90(2):888-900. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.003.
15. Gaertner S.L., Dovidio J.F. Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model 2000, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA.
16. Gaertner S., Dovidio J.F. The common ingroup identity model. Handbook of theories of social psychology 2012, SAGE Publications Ltd, CA. P.A.M.V. Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, E.T. Higgins (Eds.).
17. Green M., Fielding K., Leviston Z., Price J. Communicating scientific and technical information about alternative water supply options: A review of the literature 2010, Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 33.
18. Hayes A. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach 2013, The Guilford Press, NY.
19. Hogg M.A. Social identity theory. Contemporary social psychological theories 2003, Standford University Press, CA. P.J. Burke (Ed.).
20. Hornsey M., Imani A. Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:365-383.
21. Huo Y.J., Smith H.J., Tyler T.R., Lind E.A. Superordiante identification, subgroup identification and justice concerns. Pyschological Science 1996, 7(1):40-45.
22. Hurlimann A. Community attitudes to recycled water use: An urban Australian case study - Part 2 2008, (Report No. 56). Salisbury, South Australia.
23. Hurlimann A., Dolnicar S. Acceptance of water alternatives in Australia. Water Science and Technology 2010, 61(8):2137-2142.
24. Hurlimann A., Dolnicar S. When public opposition defeats alternative water projects: The case of Toowoomba Australia. Water Research 2010, 44(1):287-297. 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.020.
25. Hurlimann A., Hemphill E., McKay J., Geursen G. Establishing components of community satisfaction with recycled water use through a structural equation model. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 88(4):1221-1232. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.002.
26. Hurlimann A.C. Is recycled water use risky? An urban Australian community's perspective. Environmentalist 2007, 27:83-94. 10.1007/s10669-007-9019-6.
27. Kane A.A. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2005, 96(1):56-71.
28. LeBreton J.M., Wu J., Bing M.N. The truth(s) on testing for mediation in the social and organizational sciences. Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences 2009, 143-164. Routledge, New York, NY. C.E. Lance, R.J. Vandenberg (Eds.).
29. Lowenstein G.F., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127(2):267-286.
30. Marks J., Martin B., Zadoroznyj M. How Australians order acceptance of recycled water: National baseline data. Journal of Sociology 2008, 44(1):83-99. 10.1177/1440783307085844.
31. Mellon R.C., Tsagarakis K.P. Assessment of implicit meaning in the design of graphic symbols for the control of recycled water use. Environment and Behavior 2006, 38(5):689-706. 10.1177/0013916506287637.
32. Miller E., Buys L. Water-recycling in South-East Queensland, Australia: What do men and women think?. Centre for Rural Social Research 2008, 18(3).
33. Mullen B., Brown R., Smith C. Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology 1992, 22(2):103-122.
34. Nancarrow B., Leviston Z., Po M., Porter N., Tucker D. What drives communities' decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater. Water Science and Technology 2008, 57(4):485-491.
35. Nancarrow B., Leviston Z., Tucker D. Measuring the predictors of communities' behavioural decisions for potable reuse of wastewater. Water Science and Technology 2009, 60(12):3199-3209.
36. National Water Commission Using recycled water for drinking 2007, National Water Commission, Canberra.
37. National Water Commission The national water Initiative-securing Australia's water future: 2011 assessment 2011, National Water Commission, Canberra.
38. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Pyschology 1986, 19:123-205.
39. Po M., Kaercher J.D., Nancarrow B. Literature review of factors influencing public perceptions of water reuse. Australian water conservation and reuse research program 2004.
40. Po M., Nancarrow B., Leviston Z., Porter N.B., Syme G.J., Kaercher J.D. Predicting community behaviour in relation to wastewater reuse: What drives decisions to accept or reject? 2005, CSIRO Land and Water, Perth.
41. Price J., Fielding K., Leviston Z., Bishop B., Nicol S., Greenhill M., et al. Community acceptability of the indirect potable use of purified recycled water in south east Queensland: Final report of monitoring survey 2010, (Technical Report No. 19) Urban Water Security Research Alliance.
42. Roberts G. Disease expert warns on recycled sewage 2008, The Australian, Retrieved fromhttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/archive/news/expert-warns-on-recycled-sewage/story-e6frg6oo-1111117895549.
43. Roseth N. Community views on recycled water - The impact of information 2008, Research report 48.
44. Ross V., Fielding K., Louis W. Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: Testing a social-psychological model. Journal of Environmental Management 2014, 137(2014):61-68.
45. Russell S., Hampton G. Challenges in understanding public responses and providing effective public consultation on water reuse. Desalination 2006, 187(1-3):215-227. 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.081.
46. Russell S., Lux C. Getting over yuck: Moving from psychological to cultural and sociotechnical analyses of responses to water recycling. Water Policy 2009, 11(1):21-35. 10.2166/wp.2009.007.
47. Shrout P.E., Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 2002, 7:422-445.
48. Simpson J., Stratton H. Talking about water: Words and images that enhance understanding 2011, Vol. 49. National Water Commission, Canberra.
49. Slovic P., Finucane M.L., Peters E., MacGregor D.G. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis 2004, 24(2):311-322.
50. Slovic P., Peters E., Finucane M.L., MacGregor D.G. Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology 2005, 24(4):S35-S40.
51. Stone C.H., Crisp R.J. Superordinate and subgroup identification as predictors of intergroup evaluation in common ingroup contexts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2007, 10(4):493-513. 10.1177/1368430207081537.
52. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict 1979, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.
53. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Political psychology: Key readings 2004, 276-293. Psychology Press, New York, NY. J.T. Jost, J. Sidanius (Eds.).
54. Thomas E.F., McGarty C., Mavor K.I. Transforming apathy into movement": the role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2009, 13:310-333.
55. Turner J.C., Hogg M.A., Oakes P.J., Reicher S.D., Wetherell M.S. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory 1987, Blackwell, Oxford & New York.
56. Walton A., Hume M. Creating positive habits in water conservation: The case of Queensland water commission and the target 140 campaign. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 2011, 16:215-224. 10.1002/nvsm.421.
57. Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1992, 1(3):281-304. 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004.