Validation of the APACHE IV model and its comparison with the APACHE II, SAPS 3, And Korean SAPS 3 models for the prediction of hospital mortality in a Korean surgical intensive care unit

Korean Journal of Anesthesiology

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 115-122

  Lee, Hannah ^a   Shon, Yoon Jung ^a   Kim, Hyerim ^a   Paik, Hyesun ^a   Park, Hee Pyoung ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Acute physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; Acute physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV; Intensive care unit; Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APACHE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NEUROSURGERY; PERFORMANCE; PROBABILITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SIMPLIFIED ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY SCORE; STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIO; THORAX SURGERY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84907149027     PISSN: 20056419     EISSN: 20057563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.2.115     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Gunning K, Rowan K. ABC of intensive care: outcome data and scoring systems. BMJ 1999; 319: 241-4.
2. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 1981; 9: 591-7.
3. Le Gall JR, Loirat P, Alperovitch A, Glaser P, Granthil C, Mathieu D, et al. A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 1984; 12: 975-7.
4. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Pastides H, Avrunin JS, Steingrub JS. A method for predicting survival and mortality of ICU patients using objectively derived weights. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 519-25.
5. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1297-310.
6. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-29.
7. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993; 270: 2957-63.
8. Brinkman S, Bakhshi-Raiez F, Abu-Hanna A, de Jonge E, Bosman RJ, Peelen L, et al. External validation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV in Dutch intensive care units and comparison with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II. J Crit Care 2011; 26: 105.e11-8.
9. Keegan MT, Gajic O, Afessa B. Comparison of APACHE III, APACHE IV, SAPS 3, and MPM0III and influence of resuscitation status on model performance. Chest 2012; 142: 851-8.
10. Costa e Silva VT, de Castro I, Liaño F, Muriel A, Rodríguez-Palomares JR, Yu L. Performance of the third-generation models of severity scoring systems (APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM-III) in acute kidney injury critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 3894-901.
11. Nassar Junior AP, Mocelin AO, Andrade FM, Brauer L, Giannini FP, Nunes AL, et al. SAPS 3, APACHE IV or GRACE: which score to choose for acute coronary syndrome patients in intensive care units? Sao Paulo Med J 2013; 131: 173-8.
12. Soares M, Silva UV, Teles JM, Silva E, Caruso P, Lobo SM, et al. Validation of four prognostic scores in patients with cancer admitted to Brazilian intensive care units: results from a prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1188-95.
13. Metnitz PG, Moreno RP, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, et al. SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1336-44.
14. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36.
15. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839-43.
16. Afessa B, Gajic O, Keegan MT. Severity of illness and organ failure assessment in adult intensive care units. Crit Care Clin 2007; 23: 639-58.
17. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 115: 92-106.
18. Hilden J, Habbema JD, Bjerregaard B. The measurement of performance in probabilistic diagnosis. III. Methods based on continuous functions of the diagnostic probabilities. Methods Inf Med 1978; 17: 238-46.
19. Wagner DP. What accounts for the difference between observed and predicted? Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1552-3.
20. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 1997; 16: 965-80.
21. Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Steyerberg EW, Donders AR, Derksen-Lubsen G, Grobbee DE, et al. External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 826-32.
22. Terrin N, Schmid CH, Griffith JL, D'Agostino RB, Selker HP. External validity of predictive models: a comparison of logistic regression, classification trees, and neural networks. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 721-9.
23. Kuzniewicz MW, Vasilevskis EE, Lane R, Dean ML, Trivedi NG, Rennie DJ, et al. Variation in ICU risk-adjusted mortality: impact of methods of assessment and potential confounders. Chest 2008; 133: 1319-27.
24. Moreno RP, Metnitz PG, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, et al. SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1345-55.
25. Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. The performance and customization of SAPS 3 admission score in a Thai medical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 342-6.
26. Sakr Y, Krauss C, Amaral AC, Réa-Neto A, Specht M, Reinhart K, et al. Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 798-803.
27. Poole D, Rossi C, Anghileri A, Giardino M, Latronico N, Radrizzani D, et al. External validation of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 in a cohort of 28,357 patients from 147 Italian intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1916-24.
28. Lim SY, Koh SO, Jeon K, Na S, Lim CM, Choi WI, et al. Validation of SAPS3 admission score and its customization for use in Korean intensive care unit patients: a prospective multicentre study. Respirology 2013; 18: 989-95.
29. Nassar AP Jr, Mocelin AO, Nunes AL, Giannini FP, Brauer L, Andrade FM, et al. Caution when using prognostic models: a prospective comparison of 3 recent prognostic models. J Crit Care 2012; 27: 423.e1-7.
30. Murphy-Filkins R, Teres D, Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW. Effect of changing patient mix on the performance of an intensive care unit severity-of-illness model: how to distinguish a general from a specialty intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 1968-73.