Comparative effectiveness research

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1677-1680

  Hirsch, Joshua A ^a   Schaefer, P W ^a   Romero, J M ^a   Rabinov, J D ^a   Sanelli, P C ^b   Manchikanti, L ^c,d  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c PAIN MANAGEMENT CENTER OF PADUCAH   (United States)

^d University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NEURORADIOLOGIST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84907103147     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3985     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Evans H. Comparative effectiveness in health care reform: lessons from abroad. Backgrounder No. 2239 on Health Care. February 4, 2009. http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2009/02/comparative-effectiveness-in-health-care-reform-lessons-from-abroad. Accessed January 4, 2014
2. Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Boswell MV, et al. Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research. Part I. Basic considerations. Pain Physician 2010;13:E23-54
3. Brown SR. Scurvy: How a Surgeon, a Mariner, and a Gentleman Solved the Greatest Medical Mystery of the Age of Sail. New York: St. Martin's Press; 2003
4. Codman EA. A Study in Hospital Efficiency: As Demonstrated by the Case Report of the First Five Years of a Private Hospital. Boston: Thomas Todd Co; 1918
5. Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization, Institute of Medicine. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2009
6. Sung NS, Crowley WF Jr, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 2003;289:1278-87
7. Murillo H, Reece EA, Snyderman R, et al. Meeting the challenges facing clinical research: solutions proposed by leaders of medical specialty and clinical research societies. Acad Med 2006;81:107-12
8. Mackey J, Brown RD Jr, Moomaw CJ, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the Familial Intracranial Aneurysm and International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms cohorts: differences in multiplicity and location. J Neurosurg 2012;117:60-64
9. Lauer MS. Comparative effectiveness research: the view from the NHLBI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1084-86
10. Emanuel EJ. What cannot be said on television about health care. JAMA 2007;297:2131-33
11. Midwest Business Group on Health in collaboration with Juran Institute, Inc, The Severyn Group, Inc. Reducing the Costs of Poor-Quality Health Care through Responsible Purchasing Leadership. Chicago: Midwest Business Group on Health; 2003
12. Office of Technology Assessment. Congress of the United States. Identifying Health Technologies that Work: Searching for Evidence. Daryby: Diane Publishing Co; 1994
13. US Department of Health and Human Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.ahrq.gov/. Accessed December 5, 2013
14. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA). Vol P.L. §108-1732003 (2003)
15. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Effective Health Care Program. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/. Accessed January 10, 2014
16. Manchikanti L, Helm Ii S, Singh V, et al. Accountable interventional pain management: a collaboration among practitioners, patients, payers, and government. Pain Physician 2013;16:E635-70
17. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). Vol P.L., USC §111-5200 (2009)
18. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. http://www.tuftsctsi.org/~/media/Files/CTSI/Library%20Files/FCC%20for%20CER%20Rpt%20to%20Pres%20and%20Congress-063009.ashx. Accessed January 5, 2014
19. Dougherty D, Conway PH. The "3T's" road map to transform US health care: the "how" of high-quality care. JAMA 2008;299:2319-21
20. HealthCare.gov. Health Insurance Marketplace. https://www.healthcare.gov/marketplace/b/welcome/. Accessed January 5, 2014
21. Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA. Obamacare 2012: prognosis unclear for interventional pain management. Pain Physician 2012;15:E629-40
22. Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA. Patient protection and affordable care act of 2010: a primer for neurointerventionalists. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:141-46
23. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). www.pcori.org. Accessed November 10, 2013
24. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA 2012;307:1583-84
25. Methodology Committee of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Methodological standards and patientcenteredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective. JAMA 2012;307:1636-40
26. Golub RM, Fontanarosa PB. Comparative effectiveness research: relative successes. JAMA 2012;307:1643-45
27. Concato J. Is it time for medicine-based evidence? JAMA 2012;307:1641-43