An enhanced planning and scheduling approach suited to the requirements of collaborative project management

Journal of Modern Project Management

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 50-63

  Baudin, Mathieu ^a,b   Bonnal, Pierre ^a   Nicquevert, Bertrand ^a   Ruiz, Jean Michel ^b,c  

^a CERN   (Switzerland)

^b Laboratoire Conception de Produits et Innovation   (France)

^c Ecole Centrale Marseille   (France)

Author keywords

Collaborative planning and scheduling; Collaborative project management; Interven tions in large scale facilities

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907084326     PISSN: 23173963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen, J. F. (1983). Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals. Communications of the ACM, 26, 832-843.
2. Baudin, M., Bonnal, P., & De Jonghe, J. (2012). ADSM Based "2.0" System for Human Intervention Planning and Scheduling in Facilities Emitting Ionizing Radiations. Proceedings of the 14th International Dependency and Structure Modelling Conference, Kyoto, Japan.
3. Baudin, M., Bonnal, P., & Ruiz, J.-M. (2013). Combining Activity DSM with Temporal Logic for Collaborative Planning and Scheduling. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, Special Issue: Telerobotics and Systems Engineering for Scientific Facilities.
4. Boisot, M., Nordberg, M., Yami, S., & Nicquevert, B. (Eds.). (2011). Collisions and Collaboration: The Organization of Learning in the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC. Oxford University Press.
5. Brucker, P., Drexl, A., Möhring, R., Neumann, K., & Pesch, E. (1999). Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 112, 341.
6. Crandall, K. C. (1973). Project planning with precedence lead/lag factors. Project Management Quarterly, 6.
7. Dufour-Lussier, V., Le Ber, F., & Lieber, J. (2012). Extension du formalisme des flux opérationnels par une algèbre temporelle. Sixièmes Journées de l'Intelligence Artificielle Fondamentale (JIAF), 133-142. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.5664
8. Eisner, H. (1962). A generalized network approach to the planning and scheduling of a research project. Operations Research, 10, 115-125.
9. Fondahl, J. W. (1962). A non computer approach to the critical path method. Tech. Report no. 9. Dept of Civil Engineering, Stanford U., Stanford, CA.
10. Calison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press.
11. Cebala, D. A., & Eppinger, S. D. (1991). Methods for analyzing design procedures. Proceedings of 3rd International ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Miami, Florida.
12. Kelley, J. E. J., & Walker, M. R. (1959). Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling. 1959 Proceedings of the Eastern Joint Computer Conference, 160-173.
13. Krokhin, A., Jeavons, P., & Jonsson, P. (2003). Reasoning about temporal relations: The tractable subalgebras of alien's interval algebra. Journal of the ACM, 50, 591-640.
14. Lu, R., Sadiq, S., Padmanabhan, V., & Covernatori, C. (2006). Using a Temporal Constraint Network for Businne Process Execution. Seventeenth Australian Database Conference, Hobart, Autralia.
15. Malcolm, D. C, Rosenbloom, j. H., Clark, C. E., & Fazar, W. (1959). Application of a technique for R & D program evaluation (PERT). Operations Research, 7, 646-669.
16. Nicquevert, B. (2013). Manager l'interface, approche par la complexité du processus collaboratif de conception, d'intégration et de réalisation: modèle transactionnel de l'acteur d'interface et dynamique des espaces d'échanges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Grenoble U. (presented 23 Nov 2012)
17. Nicquevert, B., Boujut, J.-F., et al. (2013). Modeling engineering interfaces in collaborative activities: a transactional model. In Proceeding of the 19th internationale conference on engineering design.
18. Object Management Croup (OMG). (2011). Business process model and notation (BPMN), version 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/
19. Pinedo, M. L. (2008). Scheduling: Theory, algorithms, and systems, third edition. Springer.
20. Repenning, N. P., & Sterman, J. D. (2001). Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened. California management review, 43(4), 6488.
21. Smith, D. E., Frank, J., & Jonsson, A. K. (2000). Bridging the gap between planning and scheduling. Knowledge Engineering Review, 15.
22. Star, S. L. (2010). This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601617.
23. Steward, D. V. (1981). The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems. IEEE transactions on Engineering Management, 28.
24. Valdes-Perez, R. E. (1987). The Satisfiability of Temporal Constraint Networks. In AAAI (pp. 256-260).
25. Van Beek, P. (1990). Exact and Approximate Reasoning about Qualitative Temporal Relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
26. Van Beek, P., & Cohen, R. (1989). Approximation Algorithms for Temporal Reasoning. Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
27. Vilain, M., Kautz, H., & van Beek, P. (1989). Constraint Propagation Algorithms for Temporal Reasoning: a Revised Report. Readings in qualitative reasoning about physical systems, San Francisco, CA, USA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 373-381.
28. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.