Comparison of three instruments to assess changes of motor impairment in acute hemispheric stroke: The Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS)

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 1549-1554

  Seki, Masaru ^a   Hase, Kimitaka ^b   Takahashi, Hidetoshi ^c   Liu, Meigen ^d  

^a KANAGAWA UNIVERSITY OF HUMAN SERVICES   (Japan)

^b KANSAI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c SAITAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hemiplegia; Measurement; Motor recovery; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; LEG; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; STROKE;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84907046553     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.854840     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Liu M, Chino N, Takahashi H. Current status of rehabilitation, especially in patients with stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000;32: 148-58.
2. Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia. New York: Harper & Row; 1970.
3. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980;19:382-9.
4. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31.
5. Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol 1989;46:660-2.
6. Cote R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, et al. The Canadian neurological scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology 1989;39: 638-43.
7. Lindenstrom E, Boysen G, Christiansen LW, et al. Reliability of Scandinavian neurological stroke scale. Cerebrovasc Dis 1991;1: 103-7.
8. Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, et al. Stroke impairment assessment set (SIAS) - a new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Jpn J Rehabil Med 1994;31:119-25.
9. Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, et al. Evaluating motor recovery after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1206-12.
10. Muir KW, Grosset DG, Lees KR. Interconversion of stroke scales: implications for therapeutic trials. Stroke 1994;25:1366-70.
11. Muir KW, Weir CJ, Murray GD, et al. Comparison of neurological scales and scoring systems for acute stroke. Stroke 1996;27: 1817-20.
12. Broeks J, Lankhorst G, Rumping K, Prevo A. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:357-64.
13. Bushnell CD, Johnston DC, Goldstein LB. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale. Stroke 2001;32:656-60.
14. Nilanont Y, Komoltri C, Saposnik G, et al. The Canadian Neurological Scale and the NIHSS: development and validation of a simple conversion model. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;30:120-6.
15. Liu M, Chino N, Tsuji T, et al. Psychometric properties of the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS). Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:339-51.
16. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1994.
17. Johnston MV, Keith RA. Measurement standards for medical rehabilitation and clinical applications. Phys Med Clin North Am 1993;4:417-49.
18. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989;39: 638-43.
19. Cote R, Hachinski V, Scurvell BI, et al. The Canadian neurological scale: a preliminary study in acute stroke. Stroke 1986;17:731-7.
20. Kasner SE, Chalela JA, Luciano JM, et al. Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH Stroke Scale score from medical records. Stroke 1999;30:1534-7.
21. Goldstein LB, Chilukuri V. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the Canadian Neurological Scale. Stroke 1997; 28:1181-4.
22. Biller J, Love BB, Marsh EE, et al. Spontaneous improvement after acute ischemic. A pilot study. Stroke 1990;21:1008-12.
23. Schlegel D, Kolb SJ, Luciano JM, et al. Utility of the NIH Stroke Scale as a predictor of hospital disposition. Stroke 2003;34: 134-7.
24. Heinemann AW, Harvey RL, McGuire JR, et al. Measurement properties of the NIH Stroke Scale during acute rehabilitation. Stroke 1997;28:1174-80.
25. Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, et al. Stroke impairment assessment set (SIAS). In: Chino N, Melvin JL, eds. Functional evaluation of stroke patients. Tokyo, Japan: Springer-Verlag; 1996:19-31.
26. Domen K, Sonoda S, Chino N, et al. Evaluation of motor function in stroke patients using the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS). In: Chino N, Melvin JL, eds. Functional evaluation of stroke patients. Tokyo, Japan: Springer-Verlag; 1996:33-44.
27. Tsuji T, Liu M, Sonoda S, et al. The stroke impairment assessment set: its internal consistency and predictive validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:863-8.
28. Liu M, Domen K, Chino N. Comorbidity measures stroke outcome research: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78: 166-72.
29. Sonoda S, Chino N, Domen K, Saitoh E. Changes in impairment and disability from the 3rd to the 6th month after stroke and its relationship evaluated by an artificial neural network. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;76:395-400.
30. Sonoda S, Saitoh E, Domen K, Chino N. Prognostication of stroke patients using the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set and the Functional Independence Measure. In: Chino N, Melvin JL, eds. Functional evaluation of stroke patients. Tokyo, Japan: Springer- Verlag; 1996:103-14.