Image and surgery-related costs comparing cone beam CT and panoramic imaging before removal of impacted mandibular third molars

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Petersen, Lars Bo ^a   Olsen, K R ^b   Christensen, J ^a   Wenzel, A ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

CBCT scanning; Cost analysis; Panoramic imaging; Third molar surgery

Indexed keywords

ABSENTEEISM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CBCT SCANNING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; DENTISTRY; DRUG COST; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; OPERATION DURATION; PANORAMIC IMAGING; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THIRD MOLAR SURGERY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; YOUNG ADULT;

CBCT SCANNING; COST ANALYSIS; PANORAMIC IMAGING; THIRD MOLAR SURGERY;

ABSENTEEISM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CAPITAL EXPENDITURES; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST OF ILLNESS; DRUG COSTS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR, THIRD; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; SPECIALTIES, DENTAL; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH, IMPACTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907009263     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: 1476542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140001     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. European Commission. Radiation Protection NO. 172 SedentexCT. Guidelines on CBCT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Luxembourg: EU publications office; 2012.
2. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 11: 88-94.
3. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddard GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd edn. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005.
4. Petersen LB, Christensen J, Olsen KR, Wenzel A. Medicinsk teknologivurdering inden for odontologi. Dan Dent J 2012; 116: 726-34.
5. Norlund A, Axelsson S, Dahlen G, Espelid I, Mejare I, Tranaeus S, et al. Economic aspects of the detection of occlusal dentine caries. Acta Odontol Scand 2009; 67: 38-43. doi: doi: 10.1080/ 00016350802549106
6. Christell H, Birch S, Horner K, Rohlin M, Lindh C; SEDENTEXCT Consortium. A framework for costing diagnostic methods in oral health care: an application comparing a new imaging technology with the conventional approach for maxillary canines with eruption disturbances. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40: 351-61.
7. Christell H, Birch S, Hedesiu M, Horner K, Ivanauskaité D, Nackaerts O, et al; SEDENTEXCT Consortium. Variations in costs of cone beam CT examinations among health care systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 571-7.
8. Fuster Torres MA, Gargallo Albiol J, Berini Aytés L, Gay Escoda C. Evaluation of the indication for surgical extraction of third molars according to the oral surgeon and the primary care dentist. Experience in the Master of Oral Surgery and Implantology at Barcelona University Dental School. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13: E499-504.
9. Hol C, Møystad A, Hellén-Halme K, Torgersen GR, Nilsson ML. Workflow and experiences in Norwegian clinics using dental CBCT units: a questionnaire study. Abstract at the 19th International Congress of Dento-maxillo-facial Radiology; 2013; Bergen, Norway.
10. Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Ivanauskeite D, Urboniene A, Gavala S, Cockmartin L, et al. Estimation of cancer risk from cone beam CT exposures. Abstract at the 19th International Congress of Dento-maxillo-facial Radiology; 2013; Bergen, Norway.
11. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of unerupted and impacted third molar teeth. SIGN Publication No. 43. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network; 2000.
12. StatBank Denmark. Available from: http://www.statbank.dk
13. Available from: pro.medicin.dk 2012
14. National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements (US). Report no. 160-ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States (2009).