Estimation of flood risk index considering the regional flood characteristics: A case of South Korea

Paddy and Water Environment

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL1, 2014, Pages 41-49

  Jung, Younghun ^a   Shin, Yongchul ^b   Jang, Chun Hwa ^a   Kum, Donghyuk ^a   Kim, Young Sug ^c   Lim, Kyoung Jae ^a   Kim, Hyun Bae ^d   Park, Tae Sun ^e   Lee, Seung Oh ^f  

^a Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

^b UAE University   (United States)

^c Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology   (South Korea)

^d R and D Center   (South Korea)

^e Korea Research Institute for Human Settlement   (South Korea)

^f Hong Ik University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Delphi survey; Flood risk index; Flooding; Principal component analysis; Regional flood characteristic; Risk indicator

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; FLOOD CONTROL; GLOBAL WARMING; OIL WELL FLOODING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SILICON; SURVEYS; WATER RESOURCES;

ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGES; DELPHI SURVEYS; ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENTS; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS; FLOOD CHARACTERISTICS; FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT; FLOOD RISKS; RISK INDICATORS;

FLOODS;

EID: 84906951658     PISSN: 16112490     EISSN: 16112504     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10333-014-0430-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. http://www. tyndall2. webapp3. uea. ac. uk/sites/default/files/it1_11. pdf. Accessed 30 April 2013.
2. Brown B (1968) Delphi process: a methodology used for the elicitation of opinion of experts. The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica.
3. Brown B, Halmer O (1964) Improving the reliability of estimates obtained from a consensus experts. The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica.
4. Canter LW (1996) Environmental impact assessment, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York.
5. Choi SA, Yi CS, Shim MP, Kim HS (2006) Multi-dimensional expected flood damage assessment method (I): principle and procedure. J Korea Water Resour Assoc 39(1): 1-9 (In Korean with English abstract).
6. Choi M, Jacobs JM, Cosh MH (2007) Scaled spatial variability of soil moisture fields. Geophys Res Lett 34: L01401. doi: 10. 1029/2006GL028247.
7. Dalkey N, Helmer O (1963) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 9(3): 458-467.
8. Dawson RJ, Speight L, Hall JW, Djordjevic S, Savic D, Leandro J (2008) Attribution of flood risk in urban areas. J Hydroinform 10(4): 275-288.
9. Elmer F, Seifert I, Kreibich H, Thieken AH (2010) A Delphi method expert survey to derive standards for flood damage data collection. Risk Anal 30(1): 107-124.
10. Fedeski M, Gwilliam J (2007) Urban sustainability in the presence of flood and geological hazards: the development of a GIS-based vulnerability and risk assessment methodology. Landsc Urb Plan 83: 50-61.
11. Ferreira J, Vale C, Soares C, Salas F, Stacey P, Bricker S, Silva M, Marques J (2007) Monitoring of coastal and transitional waters under the E. U. Water Framework Directive. Environ Monit Assess 135: 195-216.
12. Green C (2004) The evaluation of vulnerability to flooding. Int J Disaster Prev Manag 13(4): 323-329.
13. Harvey H, Hall J, Peppé R (2012) Computational decision analysis for flood risk management in an uncertain future. J Hydroinform 14(3): 537-561.
14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working Group II contribution to the IPCC, 4th Assessment Report. Summary for Policymakers. http://www. meteotrentino. it/clima/pdf/rapporti_meteo/IPCC_Impacts_Adaptation_and_Vulnerability. pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2013.
15. Jonkman SN, Bockarjova M, Kok M, Bernardini P (2008) Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modeling of flood damage in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 66: 77-90.
16. Kim YH (2001) The latest theories of environmental impact assessment. Sinkwang, Seoul (in Korean).
17. Koivumaki L, Alho P, Lotsari E, Kayhko J, Saari A, Hyyppa H (2010) Uncertainties in flood risk mapping: a case study on estimating building damages for a river flood in Finland. J Flood Risk Manang 3: 166-183.
18. Lamb R, Keef C, Tawn J, Laeger S, Meadowcroft I, Surendran S, Dunning P, Batstone C (2010) A new method to assess the risk of local and widespread flooding on rivers and coasts. J Flood Risk Manag 3: 323-336.
19. Lee SJ, Kim YO, Lee JH, Lee YY (2006) Improving potential flood damage for basin flood mitigation safety level. Proc Kor Water Resour Assoc 226-230 (In Korean with English abstract).
20. Lee CH, Lee SM, Shin SY, Yeo CG, Kim YJ (2007) Urban flood regional safety assessment model. Proc Kor Soc Haz Mitig 376-379 (In Korean with English abstract).
21. Morita M (2008) Flood risk analysis for determining optimal flood protection levels in urban river management. J Flood Risk Manag 1: 142-149.
22. Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S (2005) Tools for composite indicators building. European Commission-Joint Research Centre, Inspra. http://ipsc. jrc. ec. europa. eu/fileadmin/repository/eas/composite-indicators/Documents/EUR_21682_EN_Tools_for_Composite_Indicator_Building. pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2013.
23. Park T, Choi M, Yeo CG, Lee SO (2009) Analysis of regional flood damage characteristics using relationship between flood frequency and damages. J Kor Soc Hazard Mitig 9(5): 87-92 (In Korean with English abstract).
24. Park T, Yeo CG, Choi M, Lee SO (2010) Flood damage index regarding regional flood damage characteristics. J Korean Soc Civil Eng 30(4B): 361-366 (In Korean with English abstract).
25. Rao P, Murty KSR, Amminedu E (2005) Estimation of flood vulnerability index for delta areas through RS&GIS. Int Geosci Rem Sens Sym 5: 3611-3614.
26. Rygel L, O'Sullivan D, Yarnal B (2006) A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 11: 741-764.
27. Taylor JG, Ryder SD (2003) Use of the Delphi method in resolving complex water resources issues. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39(1): 183-189.
28. Theobald DM, Goetz SJ, Norman JB, Jantz P (2009) Watersheds at risk to increased impervious surface cover in the conterminous United States. J Hydrol Eng 14(4): 362-368.
29. Trenberth KE, Jones PD, Ambenje P, Bojariu R, Easterling D, Klein Tank A, Parker D, Rahimzadeh F, Renwick JA, Rusticucci M, Soden B, Zhai P (2007) Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
30. van Alphen J, Martini F, Loat R, Slomp R, Passchier R (2009) Flood risk mapping in Europe, experiences and best practices. J Flood Risk Manag 2: 285-292.
31. Vojinovic Z, Tutulic D (2009) On the use of 1D & coupled 1D-2D modeling approaches for assessment of flood damage in urban areas. Urb Water 6(3): 183-199.
32. Water Vision 2020 (2000) Integrative water resources management plan for a long period. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs in Korea (In Korean).
33. Zhang J, Okada N, Tatano H, Hayakawa S (2002) Risk assessment and zoning of flood damage caused by heavy rainfall in Yamaguchi prefecture, Japan. Flood Defence 2002. Science, New York, ISBN 7-03-008310-5.