Does mining company-sponsored community development influence social licence to operate? Evidence from private and state-owned companies in Chile

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 294-303

  Martinez, Carla ^a   Franks, Daniel M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

community development; community relations; extractive industries; impact assessment; social licence to operate

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MINING INDUSTRY; PRIVATE SECTOR; SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; STATE OWNED ENTERPRISE;

CHILE;

EID: 84906942170     PISSN: 14615517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2014.929783     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anglo American. 2006. Sustainability report. Santiago: Anglo American. [revised 2013 Oct 22]. Available from: http://www.angloamerican-chile.cl.
2. Anglo American. 2007. Sustainability report. Santiago: Anglo American. [revised 2013 Oct 22]. Available from: http://www.angloamerican-chile.cl.
3. ArocaP. 2001. Impacts and development in local economies based on mining: the case of the Chilean II region. Resour Policy. 27:119-134.
4. BanksG, Kuir-AyiusD, KombakoD, SagirB. 2013. Conceptualizing mining impacts, livelihoods and corporate community development in Melanesia Community. Dev J. 48(3):484-500.
5. BiceS. 2013. No more sunshades, please: experiences of corporate social responsibility in remote Australian mining communities. Rural Soc. 22(2):138-152.
6. BarosMansilla M.2010. Rio Blanco y Andina: Visión de Chilenos, Division Andina Codelco, Santiago Chile.
7. BoutilierR, BlackL. 2013. Legitimizing industry and multi-sectorial regulation of cumulative impacts: a comparison of mining and energy development in Athabasca, Canada and the Hunter Valley, Australia. Resour Policy. 38(4):696-703.
8. Codelco. 2007. Sustainability report. Santiago: Codelco. [revised 2013 Oct 22]. Available from: http://www.codelco.com/informe-sustentable/prontus_codelco/2011-0801/161007.html.
9. Codelco. 2009. Sustainability report. Santiago: Codelco. [revised 2013 Oct 22]. Available from: http://www.codelco.com/informe-sustentable/prontus_codelco/2011-08-01/161007.html.
10. Codelco. 2010. Sustainability report. Santiago: Codelco. [revised 2013 Oct 22]. Available from: http://www.codelco.com/informe-sustentable/prontus_codelco/2011-08-01/161007.html.
11. Codelco. 2013. How is Codelco tax system?Codelco. [revised 2013 Aug 30]. Available from: http://www.codelco.com/preguntas-frecuentes/prontus_codelco/2011-02-28/183604.html#vtxt_cuerpo_T13.
12. Comisión Chilena del Cobre (Cochilco). 2005. Implementación de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa en el Sector de la Gran Minería y sus Implicancias tributarias. Santiago: Comisión Chilena del Cobre.
13. Comptrollers General Office. 2008. Dictamen 055616N08, Santiago, Chile. Available from: http://www.contraloria.cl/LegisJuri%5CDictamenesGeneralesMunicipales.nsf/FrameSetConsultaWebAnonima?OpenFrameset.
14. Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources [DITR]. 2006. Community engagement and development: Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry. Canberra: Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources.
15. EstevesA. 2008. Mining and social development: refocusing community investment using multi-criteria decision analysis. Resour Policy. 33:39-47.
16. EstevesAM, FranksDM, VanclayF. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):34-42.
17. EvansR, KempD. 2011. Community issues'. In: DarlingP, editor. SME mining engineering handbook. Colorado: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.
18. FranksD, CohenT. 2012. Social licence in design: constructive technology assessment within a mineral research and development institution. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 79:1229-1240.
19. FranksDM, BreretonD, MoranCJ. 2010. Managing the cumulative impacts of coal mining on regional communities and environments in Australia. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 28(4):299-312.
20. FranksDM, BreretonD, MoranCJ. 2013. The cumulative dimensions of impact in resource regions. Resour Policy. 38(4):640-647.
21. FranksDM, DavisR, BebbingtonAJ, AliSH, KempD, ScurrahM. 2014. Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 10.1073/pnas.1405135111.
22. GunninghamN, KaganRA, ThorntonD. 2004. Social licence and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law Soc Inq. 29(2):307-341.
23. HarveyB. 2014. Social development will not deliver social licence to operate for the extractive sector. Extr Indus Soc. 1(1):7-11.
24. International Council on Mining and Mineral [ICMM]. 2013. Approaches to understanding development outcomes from mining. Canberra: ICMM.
25. IfeJ. 2010. Definitions and imperatives of community development, human rights from below. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; p. 9-28.
26. KempD. 2009. Mining and community development: problems and possibilities of local-level practice. Community Dev J. 45(2):198-218.
27. Library of Congress of Chile. 2012. Communal statistic reports. Available from: http://reportescomunales.bcn.cl/2012/index.php/Categor%C3%ADa:Comunas.
28. McNabK, KeenanJ, BeretonD, KimJ, KunanayagamR, BlathwaytT. 2012. Beyond voluntarism: the changing role of corporate social investment in the extractive sector. Brisbane: Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, University of Queensland.
29. MoffatK, ZhangA. 2014. The paths to social licence to operate: an integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resour Policy. 39:61-70.
30. NewboldJ. 2006. Chile's environmental momentum: ISO 14001 and the large-scale mining industry e case studies from the state and private sector. J Clean Prod. 14:248-261.
31. NishS, BiceS. 2012. Community-based agreement making with land-connected peoples. In: VanclayF, EstevesA, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 59-77.
32. OwenJ, KempD. 2012. Assets, capitals, and resources: frameworks for corporate community development in mining. Bus Soc. 51:382-408.
33. OwenJ, KempD. 2013. Social licence and mining: a critical perspective. Resour Policy. 38:29-35.
34. ParraC, FranksD. 2011. Monitoring social progress in mining zones - the case of Antofagasta and Tarapaca, Chile. In: BreretonD, PesceD, AbogabirX, editors. Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Social Responsibility in Mining; 2011 Oct 19-21; Santiago (Chile).
35. PrnoJ. 2013. An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry. Resour Policy. 38:577-590.
36. RiescoM, LagosG, LimaM. 2005. The pay your taxes debate: perspectives on corporate taxation and social responsibility in the Chilean mining industry, technology. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Business and Society Programme Report No. 16.
37. RobinsonJ, GreenP. 2011. The technical assistance approach. In: Introduction to community development, theory, practice and service-learning. California: Sage; p. 55-83.
38. ThomsonI, BoutilierR. 2011. The social licence to operate. In: DarlingP, editor. SME mining engineering handbook. Colorado: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration; p. 1779-1796.
39. ZandvlietL, AndersonMB. 2009. Getting it right: making corporate-community relations work, development in practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.