Completely abdominal intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: Feasibility and comparison of robot-assisted and open surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2734-2744

  Kim, Jin C ^a   Lim, Seok B ^a   Yoon, Yong S ^a   Park, In J ^a   Kim, Chan W ^a   Kim, Chang N ^b  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Department of Surgery Eulji Medical School   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Abdominal; Intersphincteric resection; Open; Rectal cancer; Robot assisted

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; FIBRIN GLUE; OXIDIZED REGENERATED CELLULOSE;

ADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADULT; AGE; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; COLOSTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLETELY ABDOMINAL INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION DISORDER; DIVERTING ILEOSTOMY; EJACULATION DISORDER; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; ILEUS; INTESTINE FUNCTION; INTRAOPERATIVE BLEEDING; LOWER RECTAL CANCER; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPH VESSEL METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICTURITION DISORDER; MORBIDITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIC ANATOMY; PELVIS; PELVIS ABSCESS; PERIANASTOMOTIC STRICTURE; PERINEURAL INVASION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PYREXIA IDIOPATHICA; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM RESECTION; ROBOT ASSISTED INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION; ROBOTICS; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TRANSVERSE COLON; AGED; ANAL CANAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; FECAL INCONTINENCE; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SURGERY;

AGED; ANAL CANAL; COHORT STUDIES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84906940035     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3509-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Shia J, Suriawinata A, Riedel E, Moore HG, Minsky BD, Wong WD (2007) A Prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy: implications for sphincter preservation. Ann Surg 245:88-93 (Pubitemid 46035440)
2. Moore HG, Riedel E, Minsky BD, Saltz L, Paty P, Wong D, Cohen AM, Guillem JG (2003) Adequacy of 1-cm distal margin after restorative rectal cancer resection with sharp mesorectal excision and preoperative combined-modality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:80-85
3. Kwak JY, Kim CW, Lim SB, Yu CS, Kim TW, Kim JH, Jang SJ, Kim JC (2012) Oncologically safe distal resection margins in rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1947-1954
4. Tilney HS, Tekkis PP (2008) Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 10:3-15 (Pubitemid 350238557)
5. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303-312
6. Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:603-612
7. Chamlou R, Parc Y, Simon T, Bennis M, Dehni N, Parc R, Tiret E (2007) Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 246:916-922
8. Ito M, Saito N, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y (2009) Analysis of clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:64-70
9. Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Gullà N, Giustozzi G, Sciannameo F, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Laparoscopic vs. open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis 14:e277-e296
10. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75-82
11. Park JS, Choi GS, Jun SH, Hasegawa S, Sakai Y (2011) Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg 254:941-946
12. Kim JC, Yang SS, Jang TY, Kwak JY, Yun MJ, Lim SB (2012) Open versus robot-assisted sphincter-saving operations in rectal cancer patients: techniques and comparison of outcomes between groups of 100 matched patients. Int J Med Robot 8:468-475
13. Kim JC, Kim CW, Yoon YS, Lee HO, Park IJ (2012) Levatorsphincter reinforcement after ultralow anterior resection in patients with low rectal cancer: the surgical method and evaluation of anorectal physiology. Surg Today 42:547-553
14. Lawson EH, Curet MJ, Sanchez BR, Schuster R, Berguer R (2007) Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project. J Robotic Surg 1:61-67
15. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77-97 (Pubitemid 23019450)
16. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2009) The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:177-186
17. Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, Rosen HR, Renner K, Hölbling N, Feil W, Urban M (2005) Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1858-1865 (Pubitemid 41437668)
18. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Zerbib F (2005) Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 241:465-469 (Pubitemid 40299723)
19. van der Schatte Olivier RH, Van't Hullenaar CD, Ruurda JP, Broeders IA (2009) Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1365-1371
20. American Joint Committee on Cancer (2010) Colon and rectum. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer, New York, pp 143-164
21. Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A (2008) Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:882-886
22. Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2013) Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 27:48-55
23. Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, Guimbaud R, Rives M, Lazorthes F (2007) Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 94:341-345 (Pubitemid 46423853)
24. Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, Barberini F, Guerrisi A, Izzo L, Bolognese A, Covarelli P, Boselli C, Becattini C, Noya G (2009) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta- analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:479-488
25. Weiser MR, Quah HM, Shia J, Guillem JG, Paty PB, Temple LK, Goodman KA, Minsky BD, Wong WD (2009) Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection. Ann Surg 249:236-242
26. Lim SW, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2011) Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. World J Surg 35:2811-2817
27. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JH, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of fecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77-80 (Pubitemid 29143283)
28. Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, Zuccaro M, Cenciarelli S, Trovato C, Sonzogni A, Biffi R (2013) Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 257:672-678