Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box

Endoscopy

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 735-744

  Thompson, Christopher C ^a,b   Jirapinyo, Pichamol ^a,b   Kumar, Nitin ^a   Ou, Amy ^a   Camacho, Andrew ^a   Lengyel, Balazs ^a   Ryan, Michele B ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTENT VALIDITY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ENDOSCOPIC PART TASK SIMULATOR; ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; KINEMATICS; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATOR; SKILL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TORQUE; VALIDATION PROCESS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DEVICES; EDUCATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; LITERATURE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PROCEDURES; VALIDATION STUDY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MOTOR SKILLS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84906939855     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365463     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Opportunities and Challenges in Digestive Diseases Research: Recommendations of the National Commission on Digestive Diseases. NIH Publication No. 08-6514, March 2009
2. Cherry DK, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Rechsteiner EA National Ambulatory Medical Survey: 2006 Summary. 3 Hyattsville National Center for Health Statistics: 2008
3. Leffler D. A., Kheraj R., Garud S. et al. The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy. Arch Intern Med: 2010; 170 1752 1757
4. Mallery J. S., Baron T. H., Dominitz J. A. et al. Standards of Practice Committee. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc: 2003; 57 633 638
5. Freeman M. L., Nelson D. B., Sherman S. et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med: 1996; 335 909 918 (Pubitemid 26314443)
6. Sedlack R. E., Shami V. M., Adler D. G. et al. Colonoscopy core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 76 482 490
7. Cohen J., Cohen S. A., Vora K. C. et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2006; 64 361 368 (Pubitemid 44251204)
8. Sedlack R. E., Kolars J. C. Computer simulator training enhances the competence of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol: 2004; 99 33 37 (Pubitemid 38679097)
9. Gerson L. B. Evidence-based assessment of endoscopic simulators for training. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am: 2006; 16 489 509, vii-viii (Pubitemid 44108670)
10. Haycock A. V., Youd P., Bassett P. et al. Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 70 835 845
11. Shirai Y., Yoshida T., Shiraishi R. et al. Prospective randomized study on the use of a computer-based endoscopic simulator for training in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2008; 23 1046 1050 (Pubitemid 352019385)
12. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing APA American Educational Research Association and National Council on Measurement in Education Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC AERA Publications: 1985
13. Cureton E. E. Validity. In: Lindquist E. F. ed. Educational measurement. Washington, DC American Council on Education: 1951; 621 694
14. Joint Committee on Standards for educational and Psychological testing APA American Educational Research Association and National Council on Measurement in Education Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: 1999
15. Downing S. M. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ: 2003; 37 830 837 (Pubitemid 37083007)
16. Grant J. S., Davis L. T. Selection and use of content experts in instrument development. Res Nurs Health: 1997; 20 269 274 (Pubitemid 127078201)
17. Spofford I. S., Kumar N., Obstein K. L. et al. Deconstructing the colonoscopic examination: preliminary results comparing expert and novice kinematic profiles in screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 AB415 416
18. Obstein K. L., Patil V. D., Jayender J. et al. Evaluation of colonoscopy technical skill levels by use of an objective kinematic-based system. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 315 321
19. Sedlack R. E. The Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 72 1125 1133
20. Rex D. K., Petrini J. L., Baron T. H. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2006; 63 16 28
21. Rex D. K., Bond J. H., Winawer S. et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol: 2002; 97 1296 1308 (Pubitemid 34664769)
22. ASGE Committee on Training Colonoscopy Core Curriculum, March 2001. Available from: http://www.asge.org/assets/0/71328/71340/ 4beb70579b0546c281fd2feb21d3b144.pdf Accessed: 20 July 2010
23. Cohen J., Bosworth B. P., Chak A. et al. Preservation and incorporation of valuable endoscopic innovations (PIVI) on the use of endoscopy simulators for training and assessing skill. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 76 471 475
24. Spier B. J., Benson M., Pfau P. R. et al. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 71 319 324
25. Sedlack R. E. Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 74 355 366
26. Cook D. A., Beckman T. J. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med: 2006; 119 166.e7 166.e16
27. Cohen J., Thompson C. C. The next generation of endoscopic simulation. Am J Gastroenterol: 2013; 108 1036 1039
28. Downing S. M., Haladyna T. M. Validity threats: overcoming interference with proposed interpretations of assessment data. Med Educ: 2004; 38 327 333 (Pubitemid 38375761)