Laparoscopic staging in women older than 75 years with early-stage endometrial cancer: Comparison with open surgical operation

Menopause

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 945-951

  Bogani, Giorgio ^a   Cromi, Antonella ^a   Uccella, Stefano ^a   Serati, Maurizio ^a   Casarin, Jvan ^a   Mariani, Andrea ^b   Ghezzi, Fabio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Elderly; Endometrial cancer; Laparoscopy; Staging; Survival

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ACCORDION SEVERITY GRADING SYSTEM; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GERIATRIC PATIENT; GROUPS BY AGE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPERCAPNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE ISCHEMIA; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG EMBOLISM; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPHOCELE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RECTOVAGINAL FISTULA; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; SCORING SYSTEM; THERMAL INJURY; TISSUE ADHESION; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; VERY ELDERLY; WOUND COMPLICATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ELDERLY CARE; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; ITALY; LAPAROSCOPY; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HUMANS; ITALY; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 84906938907     PISSN: 10723714     EISSN: 15300374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000202     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:10-29.
2. National Institute on Aging. Global health and aging. Available at: http://www.nia.nih.gov/sites/default/files/nia-who-report-booklet-oct- 2011-a4-1-12-12-5.pdf. Accessed January, 25 2012.
3. World Health Organization. Aging. Available at: http://www.wpro.who.int/ mediacentre/factsheets/fs-201203-ageing/en/. Accessed December 27, 2013.
4. Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Cromi A, et al. Surgical treatment for pelvic floor disorders in women 75 years or older: a single-center experience. Menopause 2011;18:314-318.
5. Scribner DR Jr, Walker JL, Johnson GA, McMeekin SD, Gold MA, Mannel RS. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible? Gynecol Oncol 2001;83:563-568.
6. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:695-700.
7. Janda M, Gebski V, Brand A, et al. Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:772-780.
8. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, et al. Use of laparoscopy in older women undergoing gynecologic procedures: is it time to overcome initial concerns? Menopause 2010;17:96-103.
9. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Siesto G, Zefiro F, Bolis P. Incorporating laparoscopy in the practice of a gynecologic oncology service: actual impact beyond clinical trials data. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:2305-2314.
10. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-383.
11. Finkelstein DM, Cassileth BR, Bonomi PD, Ruckdeschel JC, Ezdinli EZ, Wolter JM. A pilot study of the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) Scale for the assessment of quality of life for metastatic lung cancer patients. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Am J Clin Oncol 1988;11:630-633.
12. Siesto G, Uccella S, Ghezzi F, et al. Surgical and survival outcomes in older women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopy. Menopause 2010;17:539-544.
13. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Serati M, et al. Radiation-induced bowel complications: laparoscopic versus open staging of gynecologic malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:782-791.
14. Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Cromi A, et al. Lymphoceles, lymphorrhea, and lymphedema after laparoscopic and open endometrial cancer staging. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:259-267.
15. Olive DL, Parker WH, Cooper JM, Levine RL. The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Classification committee of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7:9-15.
16. Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Cromi A, et al. Postoperative pain after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:118.e1-118.e8.
17. Thompson JD. Hysterectomy. In: Thompson JD, Rock JA, eds. TeLinde's Operative Gynecology, 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott, 1992: 633-738.
18. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 2009;250:177-186.
19. Bogani G, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Ghezzi F, Rossetti D, Mariani A. Role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: current evidence. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014. In press.
20. Plataniotis G, Castiglione M; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010;21(suppl 5):v41-v45.
21. Palomba S, Falbo A, Mocciaro R, Russo T, Zullo F. Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:415-421.
22. Rabischong B, Larraín D, Canis M, et al. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in the obese: a fifteenyear cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011;18:589-596.
23. Bijen CB, de Bock GH, Vermeulen KM, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferred over laparotomy in early endometrial cancer patients, however not cost effective in the very obese. Eur J Cancer 2011;47: 2158-2165.
24. Frey MK, Ihnow SB, Worley MJ Jr, et al. Minimally invasive staging of endometrial cancer is feasible and safe in elderly women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011;18:200-204.
25. Perrone AM, Di Marcoberardino B, Rossi M, et al. Laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach to endometrial cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2012;33:376-381.
26. Ball A, Bentley JR, O'Connell C, Kieser KE. Choosing the right patient: planning for laparotomy or laparoscopy in the patient with endometrial cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011;33:468-474.
27. Zaino RJ, Kurman RJ, Diana KL, Morrow CP. Pathologic models to predict outcome for women with endometrial adenocarcinoma: the importance of the distinction between surgical stage and clinical stage-a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 1996;77:1115-1121.
28. Gayar OH, Robbins JR, Parikh K, et al. Hysterectomy for uterine adenocarcinoma in the elderly: tumor characteristics, and long-term outcome. Gynecol Oncol 2011;123:71-75.
29. Robbins JR, Gayar OH, Zaki M, Mahan M, Buekers T, Elshaikh MA. Impact of Age-Adjusted Charlson comorbidity score on outcomes for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131: 593-597.
30. Cliby WA, Dodson MK, Podratz KC. Uterine prolapse complicated by endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1675-1680.