Joint issues - Conflicts of interest, the ASR hip and suggestions for managing surgical conflicts of interest

BMC Medical Ethics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Johnson, Jane ^a   Rogers, Wendy ^b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

ASR hip; Conflicts of interest; Disclosure; Recusal; Surgical innovation

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; SURGERY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; DISCLOSURE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT CARE; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;

EID: 84906926950     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-63     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education and Practice Washington DC: The National Academies Press, Lo B, Field MJ, 2009
2. Understanding financial conflicts of interest. Thompson D, N Engl J Med 1993 329 573 576 10.1056/NEJM199308193290812 8336759
3. All gifts large and small: toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift giving. Katz D, Caplan AL, Merz JF, Am J Bio 2010 10 11 17
4. Perceptions of Conflict of Interest: Surgeons, Internists, and Learners Compared. deGara CJ, Rennick KC, Hanson J, Am J Surgery 2013 205 541 546 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.012
5. Accountability of the accused: facing public perceptions about financial conflicts of interest. Mirza SK, Spine J 2004 4 491 494 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.032 15363418
6. Financial payments by orthopedic device makers to orthopedic surgeons. Hockenberry JM, Weigel P, Auerbach A, Cram P, Arch Intern Med 2011 171 19 1759 1765 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.454 22025434
7. Joint Reaction, Four Corners 2011 [ http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2011/s3218266.htm ] [Accessed 18 May 2011]
8. Metal on metal: is it worth the risk? Crawford R, Ranawat CS, Rothman RH, J Arthroplasty 2010 25 1 3
9. Out of joint: the story of the ASR. Cohen D, BMJ 2011 342 1 9
10. The Senate Community Affairs References Committee, The Regulatory Standards for the Approval of Medical Devices in Australia Canberra: Senate Printing Unit 2011
11. Industry payments to physicians: lessons from orthopedic surgery. Steinbrook R, Arch Intern Med 2011 171 19 1765 1766 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.439 22025435
12. How safe are metal-on-metal hip implants? Cohen D, BMJ 2012 344 1 5
13. Disclosure of financial conflicts of interest: an evaluation of orthopaedic surgery patients' understanding. Lieberman JR, Pensak MJ, Kelleher MS, Leger RR, Polkowski GG, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013 471 472 477 10.1007/s11999-012-2525-y 22948521
14. Surgical innovation: too risky to remain unregulated? Morreim H, Mack MJ, Sade RM, Ann Thoracic Surg 2006 82 1957 1965 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.07.003
15. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research: Historical Development. Lemmens T, The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics New York: Oxford University Press, Emanuel EJ, Grady C, Crouch RA, Lie RK, Miller FG, Wendler D, 2008 747 757
16. Patients' views on surgeons' financial conflicts of interest. Camp MW, Mattingly DA, Gross AE, Nousiainen MT, Alman BA, McKneally MF, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013 95 9 1-8; A.S 10.2106/JBJS.K.00863 23324970
17. Managing financial and nonfinancial conflicts of interest in healthcare delivery. Kesselheim AS, Maisel WH, Am J Therapeutics 2010 17 440 443
18. The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. Loewenstein G, Sah S, Cain DM, JAMA 2012 307 669 670 10.1001/jama.2012.154 22337676
19. The dirt on coming clean: perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Moore DA, J Legal Stud 2005 34 1 25 10.1086/426699
20. The moral psychology of conflicts of interest: insights from affective neuroscience. Thagard P, J Appl Philos 2007 24 367 380 378 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00382.x
21. Surgical innovation and evaluation 1: Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, Maddern GJ, Strasberg M, Lancet 2009 374 1089 1096 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7 19782874
22. Surgical innovation and evaluation 2: Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien P-A, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Lancet 2009 374 1097 1104 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2 19782875
23. Surgical innovation and evaluation 3: No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Lancet 2009 374 1097 1104 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2 19782875
24. Addressing within-role conflicts of interest in surgery. Rogers W, Johnson J, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2013 10 219 225 10.1007/s11673-013-9431-1 23519587
25. Identifying surgical innovation: a qualitative study of surgeons' views. Rogers WA, Lotz M, Hutchison K, Pourmoslemi A, Eyers A, Ann Surg 2014 259 2 273 278 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829ccc5f 23787218