Attitudes of pregnant women towards personally controlled electronic, hospital-held, and patient-held medical record systems: A survey study

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 810-815

  Quinlivan, Julie A ^a,b   Lyons, Sarah ^a   Petersen, Rodney W ^a,c  

^a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Joondalup Health Campus ^*  (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

e health; information management; medical records; mobile health

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUSTRALIA; COMPUTER SECURITY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT RIGHT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUSTRALIA; COMPUTER SECURITY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84906914294     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0342     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Avery B. Opinion: Why national e-health is not for everyone. Critical. Authoritative. Strategic. IDG Communication. May 13, 2013. Available at www.cio.com.au/article/461628/opinion-why-national-e-health-everyone (last accessed July 21, 2013).
2. Haikerwal M. PCEHR set to make life easier for doctors, improve care. Australian Medicine. Australian Medical Association. May 4, 2013. Available at https://ama.com.au/ausmed/pcehr-set-make-life-easier-doctors-improve-care (last accessed July 21, 2013).
3. Sheikh A, Cornford T, Barber N, Avery A, Takian A, Lichtner V, et al. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: Final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in 'early adopter' hospitals. BMJ 2011;343:d6054.
4. Jha AK. The promise of electronic health records. JAMA 2011;306:880-881.
5. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742-752.
6. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeli C, Zheng J, Rao SR, Shields AE et al. Electronic health records limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:639-646.
7. Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Socey TC, Cai B. Electronic medical record/electronic health record systems of office-based physicians: United States, 2009 and preliminary 2010 state estimates. Hyattsville, MD: Division of Health Care Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, 2010.
8. Jha AK, Ferris TG, Donelan K, DesRoches C, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, et al. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:w496-w507.
9. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008;62: 107-115.
10. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Li Z, Zeki R, Hilder L, Sullivan EA. Australia's mothers and babies 2010. Perinatal statistics series no. 27. Catalog number PER 57. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012.
11. Gupta A. Hackers, breaches and other threats to electronic records. Health Data Manage 2011;19:54-55.
12. Chanabhai P, Holt A. Consumers are ready to accept the transition to online and electronic records if they can be assured of the security measures. Med Gen Med 2007;9:8.
13. Gaylin DS, Moiduddin A, Mohamoud S, Lundeen K, Kelly JA. Public attitudes about health information technology, and its relationship to health care quality, costs and privacy. Health Serv Res 2011;46:920-938.
14. Australian Medical Association. Electronic health record. Has the Government got it right? Canberra: AMA Publishing, 2011:13.
15. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Russell J, Potts HW. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: A mixedmethod case study. BMJ 2010;340:c3111.
16. McDonald K. ICT complexity to delay opening of Fiona Stanley Hospital. Pulse + IT. Pulse + IT Pty Ltd. June 11, 2013. Available at www.pulseitmagazine. com.au/index.php?option=com-content&view=article&id=1462: ict-complexityto-delay-opening-of-fiona-stanley-hospital&catid=16: australian-ehealth& Itemid=328 (last accessed July 21, 2013).