Meta-analyses and P-curves support robust cycle shifts in women's mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and mickes (2014)

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 140, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1272-1280

  Gildersleeve, Kelly ^a   Haselton, Martie G ^a   Fales, Melissa R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mate preferences; Meta analysis; Ovulation; P curves; P hacking

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OVULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OVULATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL PARTNERS;

EID: 84906877070     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0037714     Document Type: Letter

References (70)

1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.
2. Bressan, P., & Stranieri, D. (2008). The best men are (not always) already taken: Female preference for single versus attached males depends on conception risk. Psychological Science, 19, 145-151. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02060.x
3. Caryl, P. G., Bean, J. E., Smallwood, E. B., Barron, J. C., Tully, L., & Allerhand, M. (2009). Women' preference for male pupil size: Effects of conception risk, sociosexuality, and relationship status. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 503-508. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.024
4. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306-315. doi:10.1177/0146167291173011
5. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Law Smith, M. J., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E.,... Perrett, D. I. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215-222. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.004
6. Gangestad, S. W. (2014). Wood et al.'s (2014) suspicions of p-hacking in the ovulation cycle literature are contradicted by publicly-available evidence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7. Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., Simpson, J. A., & Cousins, A. J. (2007). Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 151-163.
8. Gangestad, S. W., Grebe, N. M., & Gao, A. (2014). Of ovulatory cycle effects and P curves: Evidence for real phenomena, not p-hacking. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203-207.
10. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265, 927-933. doi:10.1098/ rspb.1998.0380
11. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation: Implications for sexual and social behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 312-316. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00388.x
12. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2010). Men's facial masculinity predicts changes in their female partners' sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle, whereas men's intelligence does not. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 412-424.
13. Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., Miller, R. D., & Olp, J. J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830-835.
14. Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1205-1259. doi:10.1037/a0035438
15. Guermandi, E., Vegetti, W., Bianchi, M. M., Uglietti, A., Ragni, G., & Crosignani, P. (2001). Reliability of ovulation tests in infertile women. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 97, 92-96. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01083-8
16. Harris, C. R. (2011). Menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered. Sex Roles, 64, 669-681. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9772-8
17. Harris, C. R., Pashler, H., & Mickes, L. (2014). Elastic analysis procedures: An incurable (but preventable) problem in the fertility effect literature. Comment on Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1260-1264. doi:10.1037/a0036478
18. Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509-518.
19. Haselton, M. G., Grebe, N., Gildersleeve, K., & Gangestad, S. W. (2014). Aggressive p-hacking: Does it produce the illusion of evidential value? Manuscript in preparation.
20. Havlícek, J., Roberts, S. C., & Flegr, J. (2005). Women's preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, 1, 256-259. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332
21. Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Different vocal parameters predict perceptions of dominance and attractiveness. Human Nature, 21, 406-427. doi:10.1007/s12110-010-9101-5
22. Hromatko, I., Tadinac, M., & Prizmic, H. (2006). Women's hormonal status and mate value influence relationship satisfaction and perceived male attractiveness. Psychological Topics, 15, 315-330.
23. Hung, H. M. J., O'Neill, R. T., Bauer, P., & Köhne, K. (1997). The behavior of the P-value when the alternative hypothesis is true. Biometrics, 53, 11-22. doi:10.2307/2533093
24. Jöchle, W. (1973). Coitus induced ovulation. Contraception, 7, 523-564. doi:10.1016/0010-7824(73)90023-1
25. Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251-267. doi:10.1016/ S1090-5138(01)00066-6
26. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Law Smith, M. J., Perrett, D. I. (2005). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the ovulatory cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 283-290. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.03.010
27. Koehler, N., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2006). Do cyclic changes in women's face preferences target cues to long-term health? Social Cognition, 24, 641-656. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.641
28. Larson, C. M., Haselton, M. G., Gildersleeve, K. A., & Pillsworth, E. G. (2013). Changes in women's feelings about their romantic relationships across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 63, 128-135.
29. Larson, C. M., Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2012). Ovulatory shifts in women's attractions to primary partners and other men: Further evidence of the importance of primary partner sexual attractiveness. PLos ONE, 7, e44456.
30. Leggett, N. C., Thomas, N. A., Loetscher, T., & Nicholls, M. E. (2013). The life of p: "Just significant" results are on the rise. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2303-2309. doi:10.1080/ 17470218.2013.863371
31. Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947
32. Li, N. P., Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). [Cycle shifts in women's mate preferences assessed using a mate dollars paradigm]. Unpublished raw data.
33. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & Burriss, R. P. (2007). Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 633-639.
34. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 76, 209-216. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.003
35. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2008). Preferences for variation in masculinity in real faces change across the menstrual cycle: Women prefer more masculine faces when they are more fertile. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 478-482. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.024
36. Masicampo, E. J., & Lalande, D. R. (2012). A peculiar prevalence of p values just below.05. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2271-2279. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.711335
37. Moore, F. R., Cornwell, R. E., Law Smith, M. J., Al Dujaili, E. A. S., Sharp, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2011). Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in human male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 774-780. doi:10.1098/ rspb.2010.1678
38. Oinonen, K. A., & Mazmanian, D. (2007). Facial symmetry detection ability changes across the ovulatory cycle. Biological Psychology, 75, 136-145. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.01.003
39. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces change cyclically: Further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 39-48. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00033-1
40. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741-742. doi:10.1038/21557
41. Peters, M., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2008). Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 572-579. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01477.x
42. Peters, M., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2009). Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies. PLoS ONE, 4, e4138. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004138
43. Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 247-258. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.10.002
44. Provost, M. P., Troje, N. F., & Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Short-term mating strategies and attraction to masculinity in point-light walkers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 65-69. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.07.007
45. Puts, D. A. (2004). Female choice, male dominance, and the evolution of low voice pitch in men (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (AAT 3139711)
46. Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 388-397.
47. Rantala, M. J., Eriksson, C. J. P., Vainikka, A., & Kortet, R. (2006). Male steroid hormones and female preference for male body odor. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 259-269. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.002
48. Rice, W. R., & Gaines, S. D. (1994). 'Heads I win, tails you lose': Testing directional alternative hypotheses in ecological and evolutionary research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 235-237. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90258-5
49. Rikowski, A., & Grammer, K. (1999). Human body odour, symmetry, and attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 869-874. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0717
50. Rohatgi, A. (2011). WebPlotDigitizer [Computer software]. Available from http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer/
51. Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2008). Women's estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men's testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 14-19. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.008
52. Roney, J. R., Simmons, Z. L., & Gray, P. B. (2011). Changes in estradiol predict within-women shifts in attraction to facial cues of men's testosterone. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 742-749. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.10.010
53. Rupp, H. A., James, T. W., Ketterson, E. D., Sengelaub, D. R., Janssen, E., & Heiman, J. R. (2009). Neural activation in women in response to masculinized male faces: Mediation by hormones and psychosexual factors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.08.006
54. Rupp, H., Librach, G. R., Feipel, N. C., Ketterson, E. D., Sengelaub, D. R., & Heiman, J. R. (2009). Partner status influences women's interest in the opposite sex. Human Nature, 20, 93-104. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9056-6
55. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359-1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
56. Simonsohn, U. (2013). It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57, 174-176. doi:10.1016/ j.jmp.2013.03.006
57. Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014a). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 534-547. doi:10.1037/a0033242
58. Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014b). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol13/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2377290
59. Soler, C., Núñez, M., Gutiérrez, R., Núñez, J., Medina, P., Sancho, M., & Núñez, A. (2003). Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 199-207. doi:10.1016/ S1090-5138(03)00013-8
60. Teatero, M. (2009). Mating strategies across the menstrual cycle: Preferences, jealousy, and masculinity (Unpublished master's thesis). Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
61. Thornhill, R., Chapman, J. F., & Gangestad, S. W. (2013). Women's preferences for men's scents associated with testosterone and cortisol levels: Patterns across the ovulatory cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 216-221. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.01.003
62. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175-201. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00005-7
63. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R., Scheyd, G., McCollough, J. K., & Franklin, M. (2003). Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 668-678. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg043
64. Vaughn, J. E., Bradley, K. I., Byrd-Craven, J., & Kennison, S. M. (2010). The effect of mortality salience on women's judgments of male faces. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 477-491.
65. Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Conway, C. A., Law Smith, M. J., Little, A. C., & Al-Dujaili, E. A. S. (2007). Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 156-161. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.010
66. Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Trussell, J., & Day Baird, D. (2001). Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: Providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception, 63, 211-215. doi:10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00191-3
67. Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., & Baird, D. D. (1995). Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation: Effects on the probability of conception, survival of pregnancy, and sex of the baby. New England Journal of Medicine, 333, 1517-1521. doi:10.1056/NEJM199512073332301
68. Wood, W., & Carden, L. (2014). Elusiveness of menstrual cycle effects on mate preferences: Comment on Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1265-1271. doi:10.1037/a0036722
69. Wood, W., Kressel, L., Joshi, P. D., & Louie, B. (2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on women's mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6, 229-249. doi:10.1177/1754073914523073
70. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.