Assessing the impact of JIBS as an interdisciplinary journal: A network approach

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 787-799

  Cantwell, John ^a   Piepenbrink, Anke ^b   Shukla, Pallavi ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ADA UNIVERSITY   (Azerbaijan)

Author keywords

citation analysis; integration; interdisciplinarity; intermediation; international business

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906859016     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2014.40     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Brandes, U. 2001. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2): 163-177
2. Cantwell, J., & Brannen, M. Y. 2011. Positioning JIBS as an interdisciplinary journal. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1): 1-9
3. Cheng, J. L. C., Henisz, W. J., Roth, K., & Anand, S. 2009. From the editors: Advancing interdisciplinary research in the field of international business: Prospects, issues and challenges. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(7): 1070-1074
4. Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695. http: //igraph.org
5. Dunning, J. H. 1989. The study of international business: A plea for a more interdisciplinary approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3): 411-436
6. Eden, L. 2008. Letter from the editor-in-chief. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1): 1-7
7. Freeman L. 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1 35-41
8. Langfeldt, L. 2006. The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments. Research Evaluation, 15(1): 31-41
9. Laudel, G., & Origgi, G. 2006. Introduction to a special issue on the assessment of interdisciplinary research. Research Evaluation, 15(1): 2-4
10. Leahey, E. 2007. Not by productivity alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings. American Sociological Review, 72(4): 533-561
11. Leydesdorff, L. 2007. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9): 1303-1319
12. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. 2009. A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(2): 348-362
13. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. 2003. Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 54(13): 1237-1249
14. National Academies. 2004. Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington DC: Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research
15. Piepenbrink, A., & Gaur, A. S. 2013. Methodological advances in the analysis of bipartite networks: An illustration using board interlocks in Indian firms. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3): 474-496
16. Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. 2009. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3): 719-745
17. Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Cohen, A. S., & Perreault, M. 2006. Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15(3): 187-195
18. Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O'Hare, A., Nightingale, P., & Stirling, A. 2012. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business management. Research Policy, 41(7): 1262-1282
19. Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. 2010. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2): 263-287
20. R Core DevelopmentTeam. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
21. Rinia, E. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., van Vuren, H.G., & van Raan, A. F. J. 2001. Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research. Research Policy, 30(3): 357-361
22. Sullivan, D., Nerur, S.P., & Balijepally, V. 2011. Source or storer? IB's performance in a knowledge network. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(3): 446-457
23. van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. 2011. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40(3): 463-472