Principles of copyright in intellectual property law: An overview

Critical Arts

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 35-46

  Woker, Tanya ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Copyright; Fair dealing; Intellectual property; Patents; Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights; Trademarks; Trips

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906856690     PISSN: 02560046     EISSN: 19926049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02560040608557775     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Copeling, A. J. C., 1978. “ Copyright ”. In Law of South Africa (5), Edited by: Joubert, W. A., Durban: Butterworths.
2. Cornish, W., and Llewelyn, D., 2003. Intellectual property: Patents copyright, trade marks and allied rights, 5th ed, London: Sweet and Maxwell.
3. Creel, T. L, and S. J. Baletsa 2004. Scientific publishers call documents delivery service to account. World Copyright Law Report, World Law Reports Group. http://www.worldcopyrightlawreport.com/Article/?r=80&c=1044368
4. Davis, G., 2002. Copyright and the public interest, London: Sweet and Maxwell.
5. Dean, O. H, 2004. Who owns the soul of a painting. http://www.spoor.com/article.php?no=287
6. Dean, O. H., 1989. Handbook of South African copyright law, Johannesburg: Juta & Co. Ltd.
7. De Keersmaeker, C. 2004. Consumer organisation files claim against music companies. Legal Newletter. International Law Office. http://www.internationallawoffice.com.Ld.cfm?i=1044368&Newsletters_Ref=8099
8. Ebersohn, G. 2003. Internet law: Peer-to-peer file sharing services. Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg (2): 376.
9. Gupta, A. K. 2004. Rewarding conservation of biological and genetic resources and associated tradtional knowledge and contemporary grassroots creativity. World Intellectual Property Organisation. http://www.sristi.org
10. Gutmann, P, 2001. Copyrights and wrongs. Legal Times, January 3.
11. Hamilton, H, 2004. Court upholds Z20 million award in Legg Mason case. World Copyright Law Report. Globe Business Publishing. http://www.worldcopyrightlawreport.com/Article
12. Harper, G, 2003. Copyright in the library–fair use: Reserve room operations, print copies. http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/IntellectualProperty/1-respri.htm
13. Lybbert, T. J., 2002. On assessing the costs of TRIPS implementation. World Trade Review 1 (3): 309.
14. Mamudi. S. 2004. Canada affirms fair use. Legal Media Group. http://www.legalmediagroup.com/default.asp?Page=1&SID=13907&CN=&C
15. Munien, K.D, 2003. Fair dealing. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal. http://innerweb.und.ac.za/depts/copyright/fair.htm
16. Newman, L. 2003. Fake goods threaten jobs and investment. The Mercury, 18 February.
17. Ng Siew Kuan, E., 2003. The impact of the international patent system on developing countries, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation.
18. Smith, A., 1995. Copyright Companion, Durban: Butterworths.
19. Stiefenhofer Lutz, N, 2004. Television formats not protected under copyright law. Legal Newsletter, Law Office. www.internationallawoffice.com/Ld.cfm?i=1044368&Newletters_Ref=8014
20. The Washington Times. 2003. Record makers settle first piracy lawsuit. http://www.washingtontimes.com/print_story.cfm?StoryID=20030909-092520-7691r
21. United Kingdom Commission Report. 2002. Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy. http://www.dfid.gov.uk
22. United Kingdom Department of Trade and Industry. Combatting Internet copyright crime. London: The Publishers Association.
23. Van der Merwe, D., Computers and the law. 2nd ed. Cape Town: Juta & Co.
24. World Bank Report. 2001. Intellectual property: Balancing incentives with competitive access. In Global economic prospects and the developing countries http://www.worldbank.org/prospects/gep2002/chapt5.pdf
25. WIPO Report. 2003. Intellectual property: A power tool for economic growth http://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/dgo/wipo pub 888 1.htm