|
Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 575-582
|
Patient perception of transvaginal mesh and the media
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ADVERTIZING;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FAMILY;
FEMALE;
FRIEND;
GYNECOLOGICAL AND OBSTETRIC IMPLANT;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL PROFESSION;
PATIENT COUNSELING;
PATIENT SAFETY;
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE;
PERCEPTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
STRESS INCONTINENCE;
SURGICAL MESH;
TRANSVAGINAL MESH;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADULT;
ADVERTISING AS TOPIC;
AGED;
FEMALE;
HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC;
PUBLIC OPINION;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
SUBURETHRAL SLINGS;
SURGICAL MESH;
UNITED STATES;
URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS;
|
EID: 84906842593
PISSN: 00904295
EISSN: 15279995
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.051 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (42)
|
References (11)
|