A head-to-head comparison of SCRalyze and Ledalab, two model-based methods for skin conductance analysis

Biological Psychology

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 63-68

  Bach, Dominik R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biophysical model; EDA; GSR; Model inversion; Model based method; SCR

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; SYMPATHETIC AROUSAL; SYMPATHETIC TONE; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; THEORETICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AROUSAL; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84906841820     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: 18736246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alexander D.M., Trengove C., Johnston P., Cooper T., August J.P., Gordon E. Separating individual skin conductance responses in a short interstimulus-interval paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2005, 146:116-123.
2. Bach D.R. Sympathetic nerve activity can be estimated from skin conductance responses - A comment on Henderson et al. (2012). Neuroimage 2014, 84:122-123.
3. Bach D.R., Daunizeau J., Friston K.J., Dolan R.J. Dynamic causal modelling of anticipatory skin conductance responses. Biological Psychology 2010, 85:163-170.
4. Bach D.R., Daunizeau J., Kuelzow N., Friston K.J., Dolan R.J. Dynamic causal modeling of spontaneous fluctuations in skin conductance. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:252-257.
5. Bach D.R., Flandin G., Friston K., Dolan R.J. Time-series analysis for rapid event-related skin conductance responses. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2009, 184:224-234.
6. Bach D.R., Flandin G., Friston K.J., Dolan R.J. Modelling event-related skin conductance responses. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2010, 75:349-356.
7. Bach D.R., Friston K.J. Model-based analysis of skin conductance responses: Towards causal models in psychophysiology. Psychophysiology 2013, 50:15-22.
8. Bach D.R., Friston K.J., Dolan R.J. Analytic measures for quantification of arousal from spontaneous skin conductance fluctuations. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2010, 76:52-55.
9. Bach D.R., Friston K.J., Dolan R.J. An improved algorithm for model-based analysis of evoked skin conductance responses. Biological Psychology 2013, 94:490-497.
10. Banks S.J., Bellerose J., Douglas D., Jones-Gotman M. Bilateral skin conductance responses to emotional faces. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 2012, 37:145-152.
11. Barry R.J. Scoring criteria for response latency and habituation in electrodermal research: A study in the context of the orienting response. Psychophysiology 1990, 27:94-100.
12. Barry R.J., Feldmann S., Gordon E., Cocker K.I., Rennie C. Elicitation and habituation of the electrodermal orienting response in a short interstimulus interval paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1993, 15:247-253.
13. Benedek M., Kaernbach C. A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2010, 190:80-91.
14. Benedek M., Kaernbach C. Decomposition of skin conductance data by means of nonnegative deconvolution. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:647-658.
15. Boucsein W. Electrodermal activity 2012, Springer, New York.
16. Boucsein W., Fowles D.C., Grimnes S., Ben-Shakhar G., Roth W.T., Dawson M.E., et al. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology 2012, 49:1017-1034.
17. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Multimodel inference - Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research 2004, 33:261-304.
18. Clark B.M., Siddle D.A., Bond N.W. Effects of social anxiety and facial expression on habituation of the electrodermal orienting response. Biological Psychology 1992, 33:211-223.
19. Conty L., Russo M., Loehr V., Hugueville L., Barbu S., Huguet P., et al. The mere perception of eye contact increases arousal during a word-spelling task. Social Neuroscience 2010, 5:171-186.
20. Dawson M.E.S., Filion A.M.D.L. The electrodermal system. Handbook of psychophysiology 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. J.T.T. Cacioppo, L.G.G.G. Berntson (Eds.).
21. Edelberg R. Electrodermal mechanisms: A critique of the two-effector hypothesis and a proposed replacement. Progress in electrodermal research 1993, 7-29. Plenum Press, New York. J.C. Roy, W. Boucsein, D.C. Fowles, J.H. Gruzelier (Eds.).
22. Lang P.J., Bradley M.M., Cuthbert B.N. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-6 2005, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
23. Lim C.L., Rennie C., Barry R.J., Bahramali H., Lazzaro I., Manor B., et al. Decomposing skin conductance into tonic and phasic components. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1997, 25:97-109.
24. Lundqvist D., Flykt A., Öhman A. The Karolinska directed emotional faces - KDEF (CD ROM) 1998, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
25. Penny W.D., Stephan K.E., Mechelli A., Friston K.J. Comparing dynamic causal models. Neuroimage 2004, 22:1157-1172.
26. Raftery A.E. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology 1995, 25:111-163.
27. Springer U.S., Rosas A., McGetrick J., Bowers D. Differences in startle reactivity during the perception of angry and fearful faces. Emotion 2007, 7:516-525.
28. Vrana S.R., Gross D. Reactions to facial expressions: Effects of social context and speech anxiety on responses to neutral, anger, and joy expressions. Biological Psychology 2004, 66:63-78.