Scenario-based resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure systems: Case study for seismic resilience of seaports

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 132, Issue , 2014, Pages 207-219

  Shafieezadeh, Abdollah ^a   Ivey Burden, Lindsay ^b  

^a Ohio State University   (United States)

^b University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

Earthquakes; Fragility analysis; Resilience assessment; Seaport infrastructure systems

Indexed keywords

DISASTERS; EARTHQUAKES; REPAIR; GEOPHYSICS; SEISMOLOGY;

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; FRAGILITY ANALYSIS; FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS; PROBABILISTIC FRAMEWORK; RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT; SYSTEM-LEVEL PERFORMANCE;

PORTS AND HARBORS;

EID: 84906835242     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.021     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. R. DesRoches, M. Comerio, M. Eberhard, W. Mooney, and G.J. Rix Overview of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake Earthq Spectra 27 S1 2011 S1 S21
2. C.L. Edwards Haiti Mw 7.0 Earthquake of January 12, 2010: Lifeline Performance 2012 ASCE Publications Reston, VA, USA
3. A.K. Tang, P. Eng, and C. Eng Lifelines Performance of the Mw 8.8 off Shore Biobío, Chile Earthquake, Procedia Eng 14 2011 922 930
4. L. Dueñas-Osorio, and A. Kwasinski Quantification of Lifeline System Interdependencies after the 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 Offshore Maule, Chile, Earthquake Earthq Spectra 28 S1 2012 S581 S603
5. A. Massie, and N.R. Watson Impact of the Christchurch earthquakes on the electrical power system infrastructure Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng. 44 4 2011 425 430
6. Giovinazzi S, Wilson TM, Davis C, Bristow D, Gallagher M, Schofield A, et al., Lifelines performance and management following the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake, New Zealand: highlights of Resilience; 2011.
7. C. Scawthorn, and K.A. Porter Reconnaissance report: aspects of the 11 March 2011 eastern Japan earthquake and tsunami [R] 2011 SPA Risk LLC, Denver, CO
8. Lekkas E, Andreadakis E, Alexoudi V, Kapourani E, Kostaki I., The Mw=9.0 Tohoku Japan earthquake March 11, 2011 tsunami impact on structures and infrastructure, In: Environmental Geosciences and Engineering Survey for Territory Protection and Population Safety (EngeoPro) International Conference, Moscow; 2011, p. 97-103.
9. B. Walker, C.S. Holling, S.R. Carpenter, and A. Kinzig Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems Ecol Soc 9 2 2004 5
10. M. Bruneau, S.E. Chang, R.T. Eguchi, G.C. Lee, T.D. O'Rourke, and A.M. Reinhorn et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities Earthq Spectra 19 4 2003 733 752
11. S.E. Chang, and M. Shinozuka Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities Earthq Spectra 20 3 2004 739 755
12. G.P. Cimellaro, A.M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau Seismic resilience of a hospital system Struct Infrastruct Eng 6 1-2 2010 127 144
13. D.A. Reed, K.C. Kapur, and R.D. Christie Methodology for assessing the resilience of networked infrastructure Syst J IEEE 3 2 2009 174 180
14. M. Ouyang, L. Dueñas-Osorio, and X. Min A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems Struct Saf 36 2012 23 31
15. M. Ouyang Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121 2014 43 60
16. M. Ouyang, L. Zhao, L. Hong, and Z. Pan Comparisons of complex network based models and real train flow model to analyze Chinese railway vulnerability Reliab Eng Syst Saf 123 2014 38 46
17. J. Johansson, H. Hassel, and E. Zio Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: comparing two approaches in the context of power systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 120 2013 27 38
18. E. Zio, and E. Ferrario A framework for the system-of-systems analysis of the risk for a safety-critical plant exposed to external events Reliab Eng Syst Saf 114 2013 114 125
19. C. Nan, I. Eusgeld, and W. Kröger Analyzing vulnerabilities between SCADA system and SUC due to interdependencies Reliab Eng Syst Saf 113 2013 76 93
20. C. Zhang, and J.E. Ramirez-Marquez Protecting critical infrastructures against intentional attacks: a two-stage game with incomplete information IIE Trans 45 3 2013 244 258
21. R. Francis, and B. Bekera A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121 2014 90 103
22. S.S. Cohen Economic Impact of a West Coast Dock Shutdown 2002 University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA
23. P.V. Hall We'd Have to Sink the Ships': Impact Studies and the 2002 West Coast Port Lockout Econ Dev Q 18 4 2004 354 367 (Pubitemid 39464362)
24. S.D. Werner, and S.E. Dickenson Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake of January 17, 1995: a post-earthquake reconnaissance of port facilities 1996 ASCE Publications Reston, VA, USA
25. S.D. Werner Seismic guidelines for ports vol. 12 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers Reston, VA, USA
26. M. Ishii, P.T.-W. Lee, K. Tezuka, and Y.-T. Chang A game theoretical analysis of port competition Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 49 1 2013 92 106
27. S. Werner, N. McCullough, W. Bruin, A. Augustine, G. Rix, and B. Crowder et al. Seismic performance of Port de Port-au-Prince during the Haiti earthquake and post-earthquake restoration of cargo throughput Earthq Spectra 27 S1 2011 S387 S410
28. R.A. Green, S.M. Olson, B.R. Cox, G.J. Rix, E. Rathje, and J. Bachhuber et al. Geotechnical aspects of failures at Port-au-Prince Seaport during the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake Earthq Spectra 27 S1 2011 S43 S65
29. S.E. Chang Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake J Transp Geogr 8 1 2000 53 65 (Pubitemid 30150035)
30. M. Ouyang, and L. Dueñas-Osorio Time-dependent resilience assessment and improvement of urban infrastructure systems Chaos 22 3 2012 033122 (-033122)
31. A. Shafieezadeh, R. DesRoches, G.J. Rix, and S.D. Werner A probabilistic framework for correlated seismic downtime and repair cost estimation of geo-structures Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2013
32. A. Shafieezadeh, R. DesRoches, G.J. Rix, and S.D. Werner Seismic performance of pile-supported wharf structures considering soil-structure interaction in liquefied soil Earthq Spectra 28 2 2012 729 757
33. A. Shafieezadeh, R. DesRoches, G.J. Rix, and S.D. Werner Three dimensional wharf response to far-field and impulsive near-field ground motions in liquefiable soils (no. SPECIAL ISSUE: NEES 2: Advances in Earthquake Engineering) J Struct Eng 139 2012 1395 1407
34. B.D. Kosbab Seismic performance evaluation of port container cranes allowed to uplift 2010 Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA
35. E.H. Field, T.E. Dawson, K.R. Felzer, A.D. Frankel, V. Gupta, and T.H. Jordan et al. Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 2 (UCERF 2) Bull Seismol Soc Am 99 4 2009 2053 2107
36. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), The uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 2, U.S. Geological Survey, 2007-1437; 2007.
37. D.M. Boore, and G.M. Atkinson Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s Earthq Spectra 24 1 2008 99 138
38. L.I. Burden Forecasting earthquake losses in port systems 2012 Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA
39. A. Shafieezadeh Seismic vulnerability assessment of wharf structures 2011 Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA
40. N. Jayaram, and J.W. Baker Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38 15 2009 1687 1708
41. F. McKenna, M.H. Scott, and G.L. Fenves Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition J Comput Civ Eng 24 1 2009 95 107
42. Vytiniotis A, Whittle AJ, Kausel E., Effects of seismic motion characteristics on cyclic mobility and liquefaction. In: Proceedings 5th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Santiago, Chile; 2011.
43. Werner SD, Cooke W., Wharf repair estimates for use in demonstration seismic risk analysis of port systems, Seismic Systems & Engineering Consultants, Oakland, CA; 2010.
44. B. Chiou, R. Darragh, N. Gregor, and W. Silva NGA project strong-motion database Earthq Spectra 24 1 2008 23 44
45. L.D. Jacobs, B.D. Kosbab, R.T. Leon, and R. DesRoches Seismic Behavior of a Jumbo Container Crane Including Uplift Earthq Spectra 27 3 2011 745 773
46. Marine Exchange of Southern California, Monthly Database Access Reports; 2008.
47. M. Kia, E. Shayan, and F. Ghotb The importance of information technology in port terminal operations Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 30 3/4 2000 331 344
48. T.-C. Kuo, W.-C. Huang, S.-C. Wu, and P.-L. Cheng A case study of inter-arrival time distributions of container ships J Mar Sci Technol 14 3 2006 155 164 (Pubitemid 44546216)
49. A. Ak Berth and quay crane scheduling: problems, models and solution methods ProQuest 2008
50. F. Glover Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence Comput Oper Res 13 5 1986 533 549 (Pubitemid 17480188)