Surface wave isolation with the interferometric Green tensor

Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and 80th Annual Meeting 2010, SEG 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3996-4000

  Van Wijk, Kasper ^a   Mikesell, Dylan ^a   Blum, Thomas ^a   Haney, Matt ^a   Calvert, Alex ^b,c  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ION GEOPHYSICAL   (United States)

^c MAERSK OIL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING; INTERFEROMETRY; SEISMOLOGY; TENSORS;

BODY WAVES; GREEN TENSORS; SEISMIC INTERFEROMETRIES; SEISMIC RECORDS; WAVE FORMS; WAVE MODES;

SURFACE WAVES;

EID: 84906812435     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3513692     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Aki, K., and P. G. Richards, 1980, Quantitative seismology: theory and practice: Freeman.
2. Blum, T., K. Van Wijk, B. Pouet, and A. Wartelle, 2010, Multi-component wavefield characterization with a novel scanning laser interferometer: Review of Scientific Instruments, 81, no. 1, 1-4
3. Campillo, M., and A. Paul, 2003, Long-range correlations in the diffuse seismic coda: Science, 299, no. 5606, 547-549, doi:10.1126/science.1078551. PubMed
4. Halliday, D. F., A. Curtis, J. O. A. Robertsson, and D.-J. Van Manen, 2007, Interferometric surface-wave isolation and removal: Geophysics, 72, no. 5, A69-A73, doi:10.1190/1.2761967.
5. Komatitsch, D., and J. Tromp, 2002, Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation-I. Validation: Geophysical Journal International, 149, no. 2, 390-412, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01653.x.
6. Lopez, 2007, Virtual shear source makes shear waves with air guns: Geophysics, 72, A7-A11.
7. Mikesell, D., K. Van Wijk, A. Calvert, and M. Haney, 2009, The virtual refraction: Useful spurious energy in seismic interferometry: Geophysics, 74, no. 3, A13-A17, doi:10.1190/1.3095659.
8. Sabra, K. G., P. Gerstoft, P. Roux, W. A. Kuperman, and M. C. Fehler, 2005, Surface wave tomography from microseisms in Southern California : Geophysical Research Letters, 32, no. 14, L14311-L14314, doi:10.1029/2005GL023155.
9. Schuster, G. T., J. Yu, J. Sheng, and J. Rickett, 2004, Interferometric/daylight seismic imaging: Geophysical Journal International, 157, no. 2, 838-852, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02251.x.
10. Shapiro, N. M., and M. Campillo, 2004, Emergence of broad-band Rayleigh waves from correlations of the ambient seis-mic noise: Geophysical Research Letters, 31, no. 7, L07614, doi:10.1029/2004GL019491.
11. Shapiro, N. M., M. Campillo, L. Stehly, and M. H. Ritzwoller, 2005, High-resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise: Science, 307, no. 5715, 1615-1618, doi:10.1126/science.1108339. PubMed
12. van Wijk, K., 2006, On estimating the impulse response be-tween receivers in a controlled ultrasonic experiment: Geophysics, 71, no. 4, SI79-SI84, doi:10.1190/1.2215360.
13. Xue, Y., S. Dong, and G. T. Schuster, 2009, Interferometric prediction and subtraction of surface waves with a nonlinear local filter: Geophysics, 74, no. 1, SI1-SI8, doi:10.1190/1.3008543.